Gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities: A review of antibiotic and debridement practices

Vasanth Sathiyakumar, Rachel V. Thakore, Daniel J. Stinner, William T. Obremskey, James Robert Ficke, Manish K. Sethi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis and debridement is controversial when treating low- and high-velocity gunshot-induced fractures, and established treatment guidelines are currently unavailable. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature for the prophylactic antibiotic and debridement policies for (1) low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities, joints, and pelvis and (2) high-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities. Low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities were subcategorized into operative and non-operative cases, whereas low-velocity gunshot fractures of the joints and pelvis were evaluated based on the presence or absence of concomitant bowel injury. In the absence of surgical necessity for fracture care such as concomitant absence of gross wound contamination, vascular injury, large soft-tissue defect, or associated compartment syndrome, the literature suggests that superficial debridement for low-velocity ballistic fractures with administration of antibiotics is a satisfactory alternative to extensive operative irrigation and debridement. In operative cases or those involving bowel injuries secondary to pelvic fractures, the literature provides support for and against extensive debridement but does suggest the use of intravenous antibiotics. For high-velocity ballistic injuries, the literature points towards the practice of extensive immediate debridement with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Our systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for superficial debridement of low-velocity ballistic fractures, extensive debridement for high-velocity ballistic injuries, and antibiotic use for both types of injury. Intra-articular fractures seem to warrant debridement, while pelvic fractures with bowel injury have conflicting evidence for debridement but stronger evidence for antibiotic use. Given a relatively low number of studies on this subject, we recommend that further high-quality research on the debridement and antibiotic use for gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities should be conducted before definitive recommendations and guidelines are developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-289
Number of pages14
JournalCurrent Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 6 2015

Fingerprint

Debridement
Extremities
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Wounds and Injuries
Pelvis
Joints
Guidelines
Intra-Articular Fractures
Compartment Syndromes
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Vascular System Injuries

Keywords

  • Antibiotic
  • Debridement
  • Fracture of extremity
  • Gunshot wound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities : A review of antibiotic and debridement practices. / Sathiyakumar, Vasanth; Thakore, Rachel V.; Stinner, Daniel J.; Obremskey, William T.; Ficke, James Robert; Sethi, Manish K.

In: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 3, 06.06.2015, p. 276-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sathiyakumar, Vasanth ; Thakore, Rachel V. ; Stinner, Daniel J. ; Obremskey, William T. ; Ficke, James Robert ; Sethi, Manish K. / Gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities : A review of antibiotic and debridement practices. In: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 276-289.
@article{ee59ceb9c01546e291503d7cb919c72d,
title = "Gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities: A review of antibiotic and debridement practices",
abstract = "The use of antibiotic prophylaxis and debridement is controversial when treating low- and high-velocity gunshot-induced fractures, and established treatment guidelines are currently unavailable. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature for the prophylactic antibiotic and debridement policies for (1) low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities, joints, and pelvis and (2) high-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities. Low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities were subcategorized into operative and non-operative cases, whereas low-velocity gunshot fractures of the joints and pelvis were evaluated based on the presence or absence of concomitant bowel injury. In the absence of surgical necessity for fracture care such as concomitant absence of gross wound contamination, vascular injury, large soft-tissue defect, or associated compartment syndrome, the literature suggests that superficial debridement for low-velocity ballistic fractures with administration of antibiotics is a satisfactory alternative to extensive operative irrigation and debridement. In operative cases or those involving bowel injuries secondary to pelvic fractures, the literature provides support for and against extensive debridement but does suggest the use of intravenous antibiotics. For high-velocity ballistic injuries, the literature points towards the practice of extensive immediate debridement with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Our systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for superficial debridement of low-velocity ballistic fractures, extensive debridement for high-velocity ballistic injuries, and antibiotic use for both types of injury. Intra-articular fractures seem to warrant debridement, while pelvic fractures with bowel injury have conflicting evidence for debridement but stronger evidence for antibiotic use. Given a relatively low number of studies on this subject, we recommend that further high-quality research on the debridement and antibiotic use for gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities should be conducted before definitive recommendations and guidelines are developed.",
keywords = "Antibiotic, Debridement, Fracture of extremity, Gunshot wound",
author = "Vasanth Sathiyakumar and Thakore, {Rachel V.} and Stinner, {Daniel J.} and Obremskey, {William T.} and Ficke, {James Robert} and Sethi, {Manish K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s12178-015-9284-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "276--289",
journal = "Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine",
issn = "1935-9748",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities

T2 - A review of antibiotic and debridement practices

AU - Sathiyakumar, Vasanth

AU - Thakore, Rachel V.

AU - Stinner, Daniel J.

AU - Obremskey, William T.

AU - Ficke, James Robert

AU - Sethi, Manish K.

PY - 2015/6/6

Y1 - 2015/6/6

N2 - The use of antibiotic prophylaxis and debridement is controversial when treating low- and high-velocity gunshot-induced fractures, and established treatment guidelines are currently unavailable. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature for the prophylactic antibiotic and debridement policies for (1) low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities, joints, and pelvis and (2) high-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities. Low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities were subcategorized into operative and non-operative cases, whereas low-velocity gunshot fractures of the joints and pelvis were evaluated based on the presence or absence of concomitant bowel injury. In the absence of surgical necessity for fracture care such as concomitant absence of gross wound contamination, vascular injury, large soft-tissue defect, or associated compartment syndrome, the literature suggests that superficial debridement for low-velocity ballistic fractures with administration of antibiotics is a satisfactory alternative to extensive operative irrigation and debridement. In operative cases or those involving bowel injuries secondary to pelvic fractures, the literature provides support for and against extensive debridement but does suggest the use of intravenous antibiotics. For high-velocity ballistic injuries, the literature points towards the practice of extensive immediate debridement with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Our systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for superficial debridement of low-velocity ballistic fractures, extensive debridement for high-velocity ballistic injuries, and antibiotic use for both types of injury. Intra-articular fractures seem to warrant debridement, while pelvic fractures with bowel injury have conflicting evidence for debridement but stronger evidence for antibiotic use. Given a relatively low number of studies on this subject, we recommend that further high-quality research on the debridement and antibiotic use for gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities should be conducted before definitive recommendations and guidelines are developed.

AB - The use of antibiotic prophylaxis and debridement is controversial when treating low- and high-velocity gunshot-induced fractures, and established treatment guidelines are currently unavailable. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature for the prophylactic antibiotic and debridement policies for (1) low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities, joints, and pelvis and (2) high-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities. Low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities were subcategorized into operative and non-operative cases, whereas low-velocity gunshot fractures of the joints and pelvis were evaluated based on the presence or absence of concomitant bowel injury. In the absence of surgical necessity for fracture care such as concomitant absence of gross wound contamination, vascular injury, large soft-tissue defect, or associated compartment syndrome, the literature suggests that superficial debridement for low-velocity ballistic fractures with administration of antibiotics is a satisfactory alternative to extensive operative irrigation and debridement. In operative cases or those involving bowel injuries secondary to pelvic fractures, the literature provides support for and against extensive debridement but does suggest the use of intravenous antibiotics. For high-velocity ballistic injuries, the literature points towards the practice of extensive immediate debridement with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Our systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for superficial debridement of low-velocity ballistic fractures, extensive debridement for high-velocity ballistic injuries, and antibiotic use for both types of injury. Intra-articular fractures seem to warrant debridement, while pelvic fractures with bowel injury have conflicting evidence for debridement but stronger evidence for antibiotic use. Given a relatively low number of studies on this subject, we recommend that further high-quality research on the debridement and antibiotic use for gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities should be conducted before definitive recommendations and guidelines are developed.

KW - Antibiotic

KW - Debridement

KW - Fracture of extremity

KW - Gunshot wound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938208116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938208116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12178-015-9284-9

DO - 10.1007/s12178-015-9284-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 26047781

AN - SCOPUS:84938208116

VL - 8

SP - 276

EP - 289

JO - Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

JF - Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

SN - 1935-9748

IS - 3

ER -