Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa from Metastatic Spread between These and Other Sites

Colin J.R. Stewart, Christopher P. Crum, W. Glenn McCluggage, Kay J. Park, Joanne K. Rutgers, Esther Oliva, Anais Malpica, Vinita Parkash, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Brigitte Maria Ronnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S75-S92
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Endometrial Neoplasms
Guidelines
Neoplasms
Endometrium
Ovary
Adenocarcinoma
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Carcinoma
  • Distinction
  • Endocervical
  • Endometrial
  • Independent
  • Metastasis
  • Ovary
  • Synchronous

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa from Metastatic Spread between These and Other Sites. / Stewart, Colin J.R.; Crum, Christopher P.; Glenn McCluggage, W.; Park, Kay J.; Rutgers, Joanne K.; Oliva, Esther; Malpica, Anais; Parkash, Vinita; Matias-Guiu, Xavier; Ronnett, Brigitte Maria.

In: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. S75-S92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stewart, Colin J.R. ; Crum, Christopher P. ; Glenn McCluggage, W. ; Park, Kay J. ; Rutgers, Joanne K. ; Oliva, Esther ; Malpica, Anais ; Parkash, Vinita ; Matias-Guiu, Xavier ; Ronnett, Brigitte Maria. / Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa from Metastatic Spread between These and Other Sites. In: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. S75-S92.
@article{4c89c8293f554557bbea4cd12ea9c923,
title = "Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa from Metastatic Spread between These and Other Sites",
abstract = "In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.",
keywords = "Carcinoma, Distinction, Endocervical, Endometrial, Independent, Metastasis, Ovary, Synchronous",
author = "Stewart, {Colin J.R.} and Crum, {Christopher P.} and {Glenn McCluggage}, W. and Park, {Kay J.} and Rutgers, {Joanne K.} and Esther Oliva and Anais Malpica and Vinita Parkash and Xavier Matias-Guiu and Ronnett, {Brigitte Maria}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PGP.0000000000000553",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "S75--S92",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecological Pathology",
issn = "0277-1691",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa from Metastatic Spread between These and Other Sites

AU - Stewart, Colin J.R.

AU - Crum, Christopher P.

AU - Glenn McCluggage, W.

AU - Park, Kay J.

AU - Rutgers, Joanne K.

AU - Oliva, Esther

AU - Malpica, Anais

AU - Parkash, Vinita

AU - Matias-Guiu, Xavier

AU - Ronnett, Brigitte Maria

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.

AB - In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.

KW - Carcinoma

KW - Distinction

KW - Endocervical

KW - Endometrial

KW - Independent

KW - Metastasis

KW - Ovary

KW - Synchronous

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059192128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059192128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000553

DO - 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000553

M3 - Article

C2 - 30550485

AN - SCOPUS:85059192128

VL - 38

SP - S75-S92

JO - International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

JF - International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

SN - 0277-1691

IS - 1

ER -