Guidelines: An Exploration and Discussion

Cleo Pappas, Alan Schwartz, Akhil Maheshwari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of this article was to explore the structure and evaluation of guidelines and to discuss those features applicable to the librarian serving clinicians, thereby meeting the suggestions for guidelines that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) initially suggested in 1990. A literature search of major biomedical databases was undertaken. In addition, organizations and textbooks were consulted. The search discovered components of guidelines in general, evaluation tools for those components, and a few evaluation tools for the guidelines themselves. A further exploration revealed attributes of guideline formation and development that serve to clarify both their value and limitations. It was determined that GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) most nearly meets the IOM’s recommendations. Its widespread acceptance, incorporation of patient values and/or preferences, and its inclusion of studies other than randomized controlled trials make it uniquely suitable to clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-174
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Hospital Librarianship
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

evaluation
grading
textbook
Values
librarian
acceptance
inclusion
medicine
literature

Keywords

  • guideline
  • health planning guidelines
  • practice guideline

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Guidelines : An Exploration and Discussion. / Pappas, Cleo; Schwartz, Alan; Maheshwari, Akhil.

In: Journal of Hospital Librarianship, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 161-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pappas, Cleo ; Schwartz, Alan ; Maheshwari, Akhil. / Guidelines : An Exploration and Discussion. In: Journal of Hospital Librarianship. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 161-174.
@article{a2a3fb964b834c1da323fa28c25591b3,
title = "Guidelines: An Exploration and Discussion",
abstract = "The goal of this article was to explore the structure and evaluation of guidelines and to discuss those features applicable to the librarian serving clinicians, thereby meeting the suggestions for guidelines that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) initially suggested in 1990. A literature search of major biomedical databases was undertaken. In addition, organizations and textbooks were consulted. The search discovered components of guidelines in general, evaluation tools for those components, and a few evaluation tools for the guidelines themselves. A further exploration revealed attributes of guideline formation and development that serve to clarify both their value and limitations. It was determined that GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) most nearly meets the IOM’s recommendations. Its widespread acceptance, incorporation of patient values and/or preferences, and its inclusion of studies other than randomized controlled trials make it uniquely suitable to clinical practice.",
keywords = "guideline, health planning guidelines, practice guideline",
author = "Cleo Pappas and Alan Schwartz and Akhil Maheshwari",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15323269.2015.1015091",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "161--174",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Librarianship",
issn = "1532-3269",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines

T2 - An Exploration and Discussion

AU - Pappas, Cleo

AU - Schwartz, Alan

AU - Maheshwari, Akhil

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The goal of this article was to explore the structure and evaluation of guidelines and to discuss those features applicable to the librarian serving clinicians, thereby meeting the suggestions for guidelines that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) initially suggested in 1990. A literature search of major biomedical databases was undertaken. In addition, organizations and textbooks were consulted. The search discovered components of guidelines in general, evaluation tools for those components, and a few evaluation tools for the guidelines themselves. A further exploration revealed attributes of guideline formation and development that serve to clarify both their value and limitations. It was determined that GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) most nearly meets the IOM’s recommendations. Its widespread acceptance, incorporation of patient values and/or preferences, and its inclusion of studies other than randomized controlled trials make it uniquely suitable to clinical practice.

AB - The goal of this article was to explore the structure and evaluation of guidelines and to discuss those features applicable to the librarian serving clinicians, thereby meeting the suggestions for guidelines that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) initially suggested in 1990. A literature search of major biomedical databases was undertaken. In addition, organizations and textbooks were consulted. The search discovered components of guidelines in general, evaluation tools for those components, and a few evaluation tools for the guidelines themselves. A further exploration revealed attributes of guideline formation and development that serve to clarify both their value and limitations. It was determined that GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) most nearly meets the IOM’s recommendations. Its widespread acceptance, incorporation of patient values and/or preferences, and its inclusion of studies other than randomized controlled trials make it uniquely suitable to clinical practice.

KW - guideline

KW - health planning guidelines

KW - practice guideline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929167816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929167816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15323269.2015.1015091

DO - 10.1080/15323269.2015.1015091

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929167816

VL - 15

SP - 161

EP - 174

JO - Journal of Hospital Librarianship

JF - Journal of Hospital Librarianship

SN - 1532-3269

IS - 2

ER -