Guidelines: An Exploration and Discussion

Cleo Pappas, Alan Schwartz, Akhil Maheshwari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of this article was to explore the structure and evaluation of guidelines and to discuss those features applicable to the librarian serving clinicians, thereby meeting the suggestions for guidelines that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) initially suggested in 1990. A literature search of major biomedical databases was undertaken. In addition, organizations and textbooks were consulted. The search discovered components of guidelines in general, evaluation tools for those components, and a few evaluation tools for the guidelines themselves. A further exploration revealed attributes of guideline formation and development that serve to clarify both their value and limitations. It was determined that GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) most nearly meets the IOM’s recommendations. Its widespread acceptance, incorporation of patient values and/or preferences, and its inclusion of studies other than randomized controlled trials make it uniquely suitable to clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-174
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Hospital Librarianship
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • guideline
  • health planning guidelines
  • practice guideline

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines: An Exploration and Discussion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this