Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health)

The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis

Ole F. Norheim, Rob Baltussen, Mira Johri, Dan Chisholm, Erik Nord, DanW W. Brock, Per Carlsson, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Marion Danis, Marc Fleurbaey, Kjell A. Johansson, Lydia Kapiriri, Peter Littlejohns, Thomas Mbeeli, Krishna Rao, Tan Torres Edejer, Dan Wikler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number18
JournalCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 29 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Checklist
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Referral and Consultation
Health Priorities
Religion
Insurance Benefits
Social Class
Sexual Behavior
Hearing
Economics
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Equity
  • Population health
  • Priority setting
  • Resource allocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health) : The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis. / Norheim, Ole F.; Baltussen, Rob; Johri, Mira; Chisholm, Dan; Nord, Erik; Brock, DanW W.; Carlsson, Per; Cookson, Richard; Daniels, Norman; Danis, Marion; Fleurbaey, Marc; Johansson, Kjell A.; Kapiriri, Lydia; Littlejohns, Peter; Mbeeli, Thomas; Rao, Krishna; Edejer, Tan Torres; Wikler, Dan.

In: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 18, 29.08.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norheim, OF, Baltussen, R, Johri, M, Chisholm, D, Nord, E, Brock, DW, Carlsson, P, Cookson, R, Daniels, N, Danis, M, Fleurbaey, M, Johansson, KA, Kapiriri, L, Littlejohns, P, Mbeeli, T, Rao, K, Edejer, TT & Wikler, D 2014, 'Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis', Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, vol. 12, no. 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18
Norheim, Ole F. ; Baltussen, Rob ; Johri, Mira ; Chisholm, Dan ; Nord, Erik ; Brock, DanW W. ; Carlsson, Per ; Cookson, Richard ; Daniels, Norman ; Danis, Marion ; Fleurbaey, Marc ; Johansson, Kjell A. ; Kapiriri, Lydia ; Littlejohns, Peter ; Mbeeli, Thomas ; Rao, Krishna ; Edejer, Tan Torres ; Wikler, Dan. / Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health) : The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2014 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{b5238486a7c44385b551acfa3bb1897f,
title = "Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis",
abstract = "This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Population health, Priority setting, Resource allocation",
author = "Norheim, {Ole F.} and Rob Baltussen and Mira Johri and Dan Chisholm and Erik Nord and Brock, {DanW W.} and Per Carlsson and Richard Cookson and Norman Daniels and Marion Danis and Marc Fleurbaey and Johansson, {Kjell A.} and Lydia Kapiriri and Peter Littlejohns and Thomas Mbeeli and Krishna Rao and Edejer, {Tan Torres} and Dan Wikler",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/1478-7547-12-18",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation",
issn = "1478-7547",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health)

T2 - The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis

AU - Norheim, Ole F.

AU - Baltussen, Rob

AU - Johri, Mira

AU - Chisholm, Dan

AU - Nord, Erik

AU - Brock, DanW W.

AU - Carlsson, Per

AU - Cookson, Richard

AU - Daniels, Norman

AU - Danis, Marion

AU - Fleurbaey, Marc

AU - Johansson, Kjell A.

AU - Kapiriri, Lydia

AU - Littlejohns, Peter

AU - Mbeeli, Thomas

AU - Rao, Krishna

AU - Edejer, Tan Torres

AU - Wikler, Dan

PY - 2014/8/29

Y1 - 2014/8/29

N2 - This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

AB - This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Equity

KW - Population health

KW - Priority setting

KW - Resource allocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949116105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949116105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1478-7547-12-18

DO - 10.1186/1478-7547-12-18

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

JF - Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

SN - 1478-7547

IS - 1

M1 - 18

ER -