TY - JOUR
T1 - Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies
T2 - Vigorimeter vs. Jamar
AU - Draak, Thomas H.P.
AU - Pruppers, Mariëlle H.J.
AU - Van Nes, Sonja I.
AU - Vanhoutte, Els K.
AU - Bakkers, Mayienne
AU - Gorson, Kenneth C.
AU - Van Der Pol, W. Ludo
AU - Lewis, Richard A.
AU - Notermans, Nicolette C.
AU - Nobile-Orazio, Eduardo
AU - Léger, Jean Marc
AU - Van Den Bergh, Peter Y.K.
AU - Lauria, Giuseppe
AU - Bril, Vera
AU - Katzberg, Hans
AU - Lunn, Michael P.T.
AU - Pouget, Jean
AU - Van Der Kooi, Anneke J.
AU - Van Den Berg, Leonard H.
AU - Van Doorn, Pieter A.
AU - Cornblath, David R.
AU - Hahn, Angelika F.
AU - Faber, Catharina G.
AU - Merkies, Ingemar S.J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Peripheral Nerve Society.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - The Jamar dynamometer and Vigorimeter have been used to assess grip strength in immune-mediated neuropathies, but have never been compared to each other. Therefore, we performed a comparison study between these two devices in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies. Grip strength data were collected in 102 cross-sectional stable and 163 longitudinal (new diagnoses or changing condition) patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), gammopathy-related polyneuropathy (MGUSP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Stable patients were assessed twice (validity/reliability studies). Longitudinal patients were assessed 3-5 times during 1 year. Responsiveness comparison between the two tools was examined using combined anchor-/distribution-based minimum clinically important difference (MCID) techniques. Patients were asked to indicate their preference for the Jamar or Vigorimeter. Both tools correlated highly with each other (ρ = 0.86, p < 0.0001) and showed good intra-class correlation coefficients (Jamar [Right/Left hands]: ICC 0.997/0.96; Vigori: ICC 0.95/0.98). Meaningful changes were comparable between the two instruments, being higher in GBS compared to CIDP patients. In MGUSP/MMN poor responsiveness was seen. Significant more patients preferred the Vigorimeter. In conclusion, validity, reliability, and responsiveness aspects were comparable between the Jamar dynamometer and Vigorimeter. However, based on patients' preference, the Vigorimeter is recommended in future studies in immune-mediated neuropathies.
AB - The Jamar dynamometer and Vigorimeter have been used to assess grip strength in immune-mediated neuropathies, but have never been compared to each other. Therefore, we performed a comparison study between these two devices in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies. Grip strength data were collected in 102 cross-sectional stable and 163 longitudinal (new diagnoses or changing condition) patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), gammopathy-related polyneuropathy (MGUSP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Stable patients were assessed twice (validity/reliability studies). Longitudinal patients were assessed 3-5 times during 1 year. Responsiveness comparison between the two tools was examined using combined anchor-/distribution-based minimum clinically important difference (MCID) techniques. Patients were asked to indicate their preference for the Jamar or Vigorimeter. Both tools correlated highly with each other (ρ = 0.86, p < 0.0001) and showed good intra-class correlation coefficients (Jamar [Right/Left hands]: ICC 0.997/0.96; Vigori: ICC 0.95/0.98). Meaningful changes were comparable between the two instruments, being higher in GBS compared to CIDP patients. In MGUSP/MMN poor responsiveness was seen. Significant more patients preferred the Vigorimeter. In conclusion, validity, reliability, and responsiveness aspects were comparable between the Jamar dynamometer and Vigorimeter. However, based on patients' preference, the Vigorimeter is recommended in future studies in immune-mediated neuropathies.
KW - Jamar dynamometer
KW - Vigorimeter
KW - grip strength
KW - responsiveness comparison
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942604803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942604803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jns.12126
DO - 10.1111/jns.12126
M3 - Article
C2 - 26115516
AN - SCOPUS:84942604803
SN - 1085-9489
VL - 20
SP - 269
EP - 276
JO - Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System
JF - Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System
IS - 3
ER -