TY - JOUR
T1 - Gonorrhea reinfection among sexually transmitted disease clinic attendees in Baltimore, Maryland
AU - Bernstein, Kyle T.
AU - Zenilman, Jonathan
AU - Olthoff, Glen
AU - Marsiglia, Vincent C.
AU - Erbelding, Emily J.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - Objectives: We hypothesized that an active follow-up program to assess for reinfection after gonorrhea treatment could be a useful disease control strategy. Goal: We evaluated an active follow-up and repeat testing program for all Baltimore sexually transmitted disease clinic patients diagnosed with gonorrhea. Study Design: From September 2003 to May 2004, all clients with a treated gonorrhea infection were advised to return 3 months later for repeat testing. If clients did not return as scheduled, field outreach was attempted. At follow-up visits, urine was tested for gonorrhea and consenting participants completed a behavioral survey. In addition, we reviewed morbidity records for any intercurrent gonorrhea infections reported during the project period. Results: Of the 667 participants diagnosed with gonorrhea at baseline, 54 had a gonorrhea reinfection diagnosed for an incidence of 13.8 per 100 person-years. One hundred seventy-eight (27%) either presented for a follow-up visit or were located through field efforts, and of these, 5 (2.8%) had gonorrhea detected on follow-up urine testing. No measured factors had predictive value in identifying gonorrhea reinfection. Conclusions: Although reinfection rates were high, we found that field staff intervention to increase follow-up testing rates did not identify a significant amount of repeat infections compared with passive surveillance.
AB - Objectives: We hypothesized that an active follow-up program to assess for reinfection after gonorrhea treatment could be a useful disease control strategy. Goal: We evaluated an active follow-up and repeat testing program for all Baltimore sexually transmitted disease clinic patients diagnosed with gonorrhea. Study Design: From September 2003 to May 2004, all clients with a treated gonorrhea infection were advised to return 3 months later for repeat testing. If clients did not return as scheduled, field outreach was attempted. At follow-up visits, urine was tested for gonorrhea and consenting participants completed a behavioral survey. In addition, we reviewed morbidity records for any intercurrent gonorrhea infections reported during the project period. Results: Of the 667 participants diagnosed with gonorrhea at baseline, 54 had a gonorrhea reinfection diagnosed for an incidence of 13.8 per 100 person-years. One hundred seventy-eight (27%) either presented for a follow-up visit or were located through field efforts, and of these, 5 (2.8%) had gonorrhea detected on follow-up urine testing. No measured factors had predictive value in identifying gonorrhea reinfection. Conclusions: Although reinfection rates were high, we found that field staff intervention to increase follow-up testing rates did not identify a significant amount of repeat infections compared with passive surveillance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644895168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644895168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.olq.0000187233.53622.8a
DO - 10.1097/01.olq.0000187233.53622.8a
M3 - Article
C2 - 16432478
AN - SCOPUS:33644895168
SN - 0148-5717
VL - 33
SP - 80
EP - 86
JO - Sexually transmitted diseases
JF - Sexually transmitted diseases
IS - 2
ER -