Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture: A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard

Ingrid Parry, Reg Richard, James K. Aden, Miranda Yelvington, Linda Ware, William Dewey, Keith Jacobson, Julie Caffrey, Soman Sen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Standard goniometry is the most commonly used method of assessing the range of motion (ROM) in patients with burn scar contracture. However, standard goniometry was founded on arthrokinematic principles and doesn't consider the cutaneous biomechanical influence between adjacent joint positions and skin pliability to accommodate motion. Therefore, the use of standard goniometry to measure burn scar contracture is called into question. This prospective, multicenter, comparative study investigated the difference between standard goniometry, based on arthrokinematics and a revised goniometry protocol, based on principles of cutaneokinematics and functional positions to measure ROM outcome in burn survivors. Data were collected for 174 joints from 66 subjects at seven burn centers totaling 1044 measurements for comparison. ROM findings using the revised protocol demonstrated significantly more limitation in motion 38.8 ± 15.2% than the standard protocol 32.1 ± 13.4% (p <.0001). Individual analyses of the motions likewise showed significantly more limitation with revised goniometry compared with standard goniometry for 9/11 joint motions. Pearson's correlation showed a significant positive correlation between the percentage of cutaneous functional units scarred and ROM outcome for the revised protocol (R 2 =.05, p =.0008) and the Δbetween the revised and standard protocols (R 2 =.04, p =.0025) but no correlation was found with the standard goniometric protocol (R 2 =.015, p =.065). The results of this study support the hypothesis that standard goniometry underestimates the ROM impairment for individuals whose motion is limited by burn scars. Having measurement methods that consider the unique characteristics of skin impairment and the impact on functional positions is an important priority for both clinical reporting and future research in burn rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberirz038
Pages (from-to)377-385
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 21 2019

Fingerprint

Contracture
Cicatrix
Articular Range of Motion
Skin
Joints
Burn Units
Pliability
Multicenter Studies
Survivors
Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Parry, I., Richard, R., Aden, J. K., Yelvington, M., Ware, L., Dewey, W., ... Sen, S. (2019). Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture: A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 40(4), 377-385. [irz038]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irz038

Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture : A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard. / Parry, Ingrid; Richard, Reg; Aden, James K.; Yelvington, Miranda; Ware, Linda; Dewey, William; Jacobson, Keith; Caffrey, Julie; Sen, Soman.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 40, No. 4, irz038, 21.06.2019, p. 377-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parry, I, Richard, R, Aden, JK, Yelvington, M, Ware, L, Dewey, W, Jacobson, K, Caffrey, J & Sen, S 2019, 'Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture: A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard', Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 40, no. 4, irz038, pp. 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irz038
Parry, Ingrid ; Richard, Reg ; Aden, James K. ; Yelvington, Miranda ; Ware, Linda ; Dewey, William ; Jacobson, Keith ; Caffrey, Julie ; Sen, Soman. / Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture : A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2019 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 377-385.
@article{f6b4a18a3f184e099b5fedcf287ff0f3,
title = "Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture: A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard",
abstract = "Standard goniometry is the most commonly used method of assessing the range of motion (ROM) in patients with burn scar contracture. However, standard goniometry was founded on arthrokinematic principles and doesn't consider the cutaneous biomechanical influence between adjacent joint positions and skin pliability to accommodate motion. Therefore, the use of standard goniometry to measure burn scar contracture is called into question. This prospective, multicenter, comparative study investigated the difference between standard goniometry, based on arthrokinematics and a revised goniometry protocol, based on principles of cutaneokinematics and functional positions to measure ROM outcome in burn survivors. Data were collected for 174 joints from 66 subjects at seven burn centers totaling 1044 measurements for comparison. ROM findings using the revised protocol demonstrated significantly more limitation in motion 38.8 ± 15.2{\%} than the standard protocol 32.1 ± 13.4{\%} (p <.0001). Individual analyses of the motions likewise showed significantly more limitation with revised goniometry compared with standard goniometry for 9/11 joint motions. Pearson's correlation showed a significant positive correlation between the percentage of cutaneous functional units scarred and ROM outcome for the revised protocol (R 2 =.05, p =.0008) and the Δbetween the revised and standard protocols (R 2 =.04, p =.0025) but no correlation was found with the standard goniometric protocol (R 2 =.015, p =.065). The results of this study support the hypothesis that standard goniometry underestimates the ROM impairment for individuals whose motion is limited by burn scars. Having measurement methods that consider the unique characteristics of skin impairment and the impact on functional positions is an important priority for both clinical reporting and future research in burn rehabilitation.",
author = "Ingrid Parry and Reg Richard and Aden, {James K.} and Miranda Yelvington and Linda Ware and William Dewey and Keith Jacobson and Julie Caffrey and Soman Sen",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/irz038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "377--385",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goniometric Measurement of Burn Scar Contracture

T2 - A Paradigm Shift Challenging the Standard

AU - Parry, Ingrid

AU - Richard, Reg

AU - Aden, James K.

AU - Yelvington, Miranda

AU - Ware, Linda

AU - Dewey, William

AU - Jacobson, Keith

AU - Caffrey, Julie

AU - Sen, Soman

PY - 2019/6/21

Y1 - 2019/6/21

N2 - Standard goniometry is the most commonly used method of assessing the range of motion (ROM) in patients with burn scar contracture. However, standard goniometry was founded on arthrokinematic principles and doesn't consider the cutaneous biomechanical influence between adjacent joint positions and skin pliability to accommodate motion. Therefore, the use of standard goniometry to measure burn scar contracture is called into question. This prospective, multicenter, comparative study investigated the difference between standard goniometry, based on arthrokinematics and a revised goniometry protocol, based on principles of cutaneokinematics and functional positions to measure ROM outcome in burn survivors. Data were collected for 174 joints from 66 subjects at seven burn centers totaling 1044 measurements for comparison. ROM findings using the revised protocol demonstrated significantly more limitation in motion 38.8 ± 15.2% than the standard protocol 32.1 ± 13.4% (p <.0001). Individual analyses of the motions likewise showed significantly more limitation with revised goniometry compared with standard goniometry for 9/11 joint motions. Pearson's correlation showed a significant positive correlation between the percentage of cutaneous functional units scarred and ROM outcome for the revised protocol (R 2 =.05, p =.0008) and the Δbetween the revised and standard protocols (R 2 =.04, p =.0025) but no correlation was found with the standard goniometric protocol (R 2 =.015, p =.065). The results of this study support the hypothesis that standard goniometry underestimates the ROM impairment for individuals whose motion is limited by burn scars. Having measurement methods that consider the unique characteristics of skin impairment and the impact on functional positions is an important priority for both clinical reporting and future research in burn rehabilitation.

AB - Standard goniometry is the most commonly used method of assessing the range of motion (ROM) in patients with burn scar contracture. However, standard goniometry was founded on arthrokinematic principles and doesn't consider the cutaneous biomechanical influence between adjacent joint positions and skin pliability to accommodate motion. Therefore, the use of standard goniometry to measure burn scar contracture is called into question. This prospective, multicenter, comparative study investigated the difference between standard goniometry, based on arthrokinematics and a revised goniometry protocol, based on principles of cutaneokinematics and functional positions to measure ROM outcome in burn survivors. Data were collected for 174 joints from 66 subjects at seven burn centers totaling 1044 measurements for comparison. ROM findings using the revised protocol demonstrated significantly more limitation in motion 38.8 ± 15.2% than the standard protocol 32.1 ± 13.4% (p <.0001). Individual analyses of the motions likewise showed significantly more limitation with revised goniometry compared with standard goniometry for 9/11 joint motions. Pearson's correlation showed a significant positive correlation between the percentage of cutaneous functional units scarred and ROM outcome for the revised protocol (R 2 =.05, p =.0008) and the Δbetween the revised and standard protocols (R 2 =.04, p =.0025) but no correlation was found with the standard goniometric protocol (R 2 =.015, p =.065). The results of this study support the hypothesis that standard goniometry underestimates the ROM impairment for individuals whose motion is limited by burn scars. Having measurement methods that consider the unique characteristics of skin impairment and the impact on functional positions is an important priority for both clinical reporting and future research in burn rehabilitation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068538112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068538112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/irz038

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/irz038

M3 - Article

C2 - 30919903

AN - SCOPUS:85068538112

VL - 40

SP - 377

EP - 385

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 4

M1 - irz038

ER -