Genotype-Specific minimal residual disease interpretation improves stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

David O'Connor, Amir Enshaei, Jack Bartram, Jeremy Hancock, Christine J. Harrison, Rachael Hough, Sujith Samarasinghe, Claire Schwab, Ajay Vora, Rachel Wade, John Moppett, Anthony V. Moorman, Nick Goulden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose Minimal residual disease (MRD) and genetic abnormalities are important risk factors for outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Current risk algorithms dichotomize MRD data and do not assimilate genetics when assigning MRD risk, which reduces predictive accuracy. The aim of our study was to exploit the full power ofMRD by examining it as a continuous variable and to integrate itwith genetics. Patients and Methods We used a population-based cohort of 3,113 patients who were treated in UKALL2003, with a median follow-up of 7 years. MRD was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction analysis of Ig/TCR gene rearrangements, and patients were assigned to a genetic subtype on the basis of immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. To examine response kinetics at the end of induction, we log-Transformed the absolute MRD value and examined its distribution across subgroups. Results MRD was log normally distributed at the end of induction. MRD distributions of patients with distinct genetic subtypes were different (P , .001). Patients with good-risk cytogenetics demonstrated the fastest disease clearance, whereas patients with high-risk genetics and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia responded more slowly. The risk of relapse was correlated with MRD kinetics, and each log reduction in disease level reduced the risk by 20% (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.83; P,.001). Although the risk of relapse was directly proportional to theMRD level within each genetic risk group, absolute relapse rate that was associated with a specific MRD value or category varied significantly by genetic subtype. Integration of genetic subtype-specific MRD values allowed more refined risk group stratification. Conclusion A single threshold for assigning patients to an MRD risk group does not reflect the response kinetics of the different genetic subtypes. Future risk algorithms should integrate genetics with MRD to accurately identify patients with the lowest and highest risk of relapse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-43
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genotype-Specific minimal residual disease interpretation improves stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this