Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder

S. Prathikanti, F. J. McMahon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A genome-wide scan for genetic linkage can suggest fresh insights into disease aetiology. However, in the case of complex disorders such as bipolar affective disorder (BPAD), the results of genome-wide scans must be interpreted with caution. We review 10 published and 10 in-progress genome scans of BPAD, encompassing 3536 affected individuals in 1119 pedigrees. We find that ascertainment methods vary widely, with no two studies using identical methods. Sample sizes and marker densities have generally been well below what is now considered adequate, but several in-progress studies are using larger samples and more closely spaced markers. Few findings reach the 'suggestive' threshold, and fewer still reach the 'significant' threshold at genome-wide levels of significance. Strategies for pooling samples or subjecting findings in different samples to meta-analysis are being developed, but differences in ascertainment methods may have a large impact on the uniformity of different samples and hamper efforts at combining data or findings. There is also a need for methods that help define more genetically homogeneous phenotypes, take into account interactions between multiple susceptibility loci, and accommodate additional complexity (eg parent-of-origin effects) in the search for linkage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-262
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Medicine
Volume33
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mood Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Genome
Genes
Genetic Linkage
Pedigree
Sample Size
Meta-Analysis
Phenotype

Keywords

  • Bipolar affective disorder
  • Genome scans
  • Linkage analysis
  • Psychiatric genetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Prathikanti, S., & McMahon, F. J. (2001). Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder. Annals of Medicine, 33(4), 257-262.

Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder. / Prathikanti, S.; McMahon, F. J.

In: Annals of Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2001, p. 257-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prathikanti, S & McMahon, FJ 2001, 'Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder', Annals of Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 257-262.
Prathikanti, S. ; McMahon, F. J. / Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder. In: Annals of Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 257-262.
@article{a8aafd21a4c941c38d24b0ccbe7059d3,
title = "Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder",
abstract = "A genome-wide scan for genetic linkage can suggest fresh insights into disease aetiology. However, in the case of complex disorders such as bipolar affective disorder (BPAD), the results of genome-wide scans must be interpreted with caution. We review 10 published and 10 in-progress genome scans of BPAD, encompassing 3536 affected individuals in 1119 pedigrees. We find that ascertainment methods vary widely, with no two studies using identical methods. Sample sizes and marker densities have generally been well below what is now considered adequate, but several in-progress studies are using larger samples and more closely spaced markers. Few findings reach the 'suggestive' threshold, and fewer still reach the 'significant' threshold at genome-wide levels of significance. Strategies for pooling samples or subjecting findings in different samples to meta-analysis are being developed, but differences in ascertainment methods may have a large impact on the uniformity of different samples and hamper efforts at combining data or findings. There is also a need for methods that help define more genetically homogeneous phenotypes, take into account interactions between multiple susceptibility loci, and accommodate additional complexity (eg parent-of-origin effects) in the search for linkage.",
keywords = "Bipolar affective disorder, Genome scans, Linkage analysis, Psychiatric genetics",
author = "S. Prathikanti and McMahon, {F. J.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "257--262",
journal = "Annals of Medicine",
issn = "0785-3890",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genome scans for susceptibility genes in bipolar affective disorder

AU - Prathikanti, S.

AU - McMahon, F. J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A genome-wide scan for genetic linkage can suggest fresh insights into disease aetiology. However, in the case of complex disorders such as bipolar affective disorder (BPAD), the results of genome-wide scans must be interpreted with caution. We review 10 published and 10 in-progress genome scans of BPAD, encompassing 3536 affected individuals in 1119 pedigrees. We find that ascertainment methods vary widely, with no two studies using identical methods. Sample sizes and marker densities have generally been well below what is now considered adequate, but several in-progress studies are using larger samples and more closely spaced markers. Few findings reach the 'suggestive' threshold, and fewer still reach the 'significant' threshold at genome-wide levels of significance. Strategies for pooling samples or subjecting findings in different samples to meta-analysis are being developed, but differences in ascertainment methods may have a large impact on the uniformity of different samples and hamper efforts at combining data or findings. There is also a need for methods that help define more genetically homogeneous phenotypes, take into account interactions between multiple susceptibility loci, and accommodate additional complexity (eg parent-of-origin effects) in the search for linkage.

AB - A genome-wide scan for genetic linkage can suggest fresh insights into disease aetiology. However, in the case of complex disorders such as bipolar affective disorder (BPAD), the results of genome-wide scans must be interpreted with caution. We review 10 published and 10 in-progress genome scans of BPAD, encompassing 3536 affected individuals in 1119 pedigrees. We find that ascertainment methods vary widely, with no two studies using identical methods. Sample sizes and marker densities have generally been well below what is now considered adequate, but several in-progress studies are using larger samples and more closely spaced markers. Few findings reach the 'suggestive' threshold, and fewer still reach the 'significant' threshold at genome-wide levels of significance. Strategies for pooling samples or subjecting findings in different samples to meta-analysis are being developed, but differences in ascertainment methods may have a large impact on the uniformity of different samples and hamper efforts at combining data or findings. There is also a need for methods that help define more genetically homogeneous phenotypes, take into account interactions between multiple susceptibility loci, and accommodate additional complexity (eg parent-of-origin effects) in the search for linkage.

KW - Bipolar affective disorder

KW - Genome scans

KW - Linkage analysis

KW - Psychiatric genetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034987295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034987295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11405547

AN - SCOPUS:0034987295

VL - 33

SP - 257

EP - 262

JO - Annals of Medicine

JF - Annals of Medicine

SN - 0785-3890

IS - 4

ER -