Genetic variation within and among lion tamarins

Lisa Forman, Devra G. Kleiman, R. Mitchell Bush, James M. Dietz, Jonathan D. Ballou, Lyndsay G. Phillips, Adelmar F. Coimbra‐Filho, Stephen J. O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

The golden lion tamarin Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia, one of the rarest and most endangered of New World primates, has been the focus of an intensive research and conservation effort for two decades. During that period, managed breeding from 44 founders has brought the captive population to over 400 individuals, a number that equals or exceeds the estimated number of free‐ranging golden lion tamarins. The extent of genetic variation among golden lion tamarins was estimated with an electrophoretic survey of 47 allozyme loci from 67 captive and 73 free‐ranging individuals. The amount of variation was low, compared to 15 other primate species, with 4% of the loci being polymorphic (P), and with an average heterozygosity H estimate of 0.01 in these callitrichids. Electrophoretic analyses of captive and free‐ranging animals (N = 31) of two allopatric morphotypes, Leontopithecus rosalia chrysopygus and L. r. chrysomelas, were similar to the L. r. rosalia findings insofar as they also revealed limited genetic polymorphism. Computation of the Neigenetic distance measurements showed that the three morphotypes were genetically very similar, although discernible differentiation had occurred at two loci. These data are consistent with the occurrence of recent reproductive isolations of these subspecies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican journal of physical anthropology
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1986
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Genetic distance
  • Isozymes
  • Leontopithecus
  • Subspecies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Anthropology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic variation within and among lion tamarins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this