Generalization and multirate models of motor adaptation

Hirokazu Tanaka, John Krakauer, Terrence J. Sejnowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

assessed psychophysically in two ways: by testing untrained locations in the work space at the end of adaptation (slow postadaptation generalization) or by determining the influence of an error on the next trial during adaptation (fast trial-by-trial generalization). These two measures of generalization have been widely used in psychophysical studies, but the reason that they might differ has not been addressed explicitly. Our goal was to develop a computational framework for determining when a two-state model is justified by the data and to explore the implications of these two types of generalization for neural representations of movements. We first investigated, for single-target learning, how well standard statistical model selection procedures can discriminate two-process models from single-process models when learning and retention coefficients were systematically varied. We then built a two-state model for multitarget learning and showed that if an adaptation process is indeed two-rate, then the postadaptation generalization approach primarily probes the slow process, whereas the trial-by-trial generalization approach is most informative about the fast process. The fast process, due to its strong sensitivity to trial error, contributes predominantly to trial-by-trial generalization, whereas the strong retention of the slow system contributes predominantly to postadaptation generalization. Thus, when adaptation can be shown to be two-rate, the two measures of generalization may probe different brain representations of movement direction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)939-966
Number of pages28
JournalNeural Computation
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Learning
Statistical Models
Workplace
Brain
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Generalization and multirate models of motor adaptation. / Tanaka, Hirokazu; Krakauer, John; Sejnowski, Terrence J.

In: Neural Computation, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2012, p. 939-966.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tanaka, Hirokazu ; Krakauer, John ; Sejnowski, Terrence J. / Generalization and multirate models of motor adaptation. In: Neural Computation. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 939-966.
@article{1ff692ac34b64f35a731a70ef1db492b,
title = "Generalization and multirate models of motor adaptation",
abstract = "assessed psychophysically in two ways: by testing untrained locations in the work space at the end of adaptation (slow postadaptation generalization) or by determining the influence of an error on the next trial during adaptation (fast trial-by-trial generalization). These two measures of generalization have been widely used in psychophysical studies, but the reason that they might differ has not been addressed explicitly. Our goal was to develop a computational framework for determining when a two-state model is justified by the data and to explore the implications of these two types of generalization for neural representations of movements. We first investigated, for single-target learning, how well standard statistical model selection procedures can discriminate two-process models from single-process models when learning and retention coefficients were systematically varied. We then built a two-state model for multitarget learning and showed that if an adaptation process is indeed two-rate, then the postadaptation generalization approach primarily probes the slow process, whereas the trial-by-trial generalization approach is most informative about the fast process. The fast process, due to its strong sensitivity to trial error, contributes predominantly to trial-by-trial generalization, whereas the strong retention of the slow system contributes predominantly to postadaptation generalization. Thus, when adaptation can be shown to be two-rate, the two measures of generalization may probe different brain representations of movement direction.",
author = "Hirokazu Tanaka and John Krakauer and Sejnowski, {Terrence J.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1162/NECO_a_00262",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "939--966",
journal = "Neural Computation",
issn = "0899-7667",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalization and multirate models of motor adaptation

AU - Tanaka, Hirokazu

AU - Krakauer, John

AU - Sejnowski, Terrence J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - assessed psychophysically in two ways: by testing untrained locations in the work space at the end of adaptation (slow postadaptation generalization) or by determining the influence of an error on the next trial during adaptation (fast trial-by-trial generalization). These two measures of generalization have been widely used in psychophysical studies, but the reason that they might differ has not been addressed explicitly. Our goal was to develop a computational framework for determining when a two-state model is justified by the data and to explore the implications of these two types of generalization for neural representations of movements. We first investigated, for single-target learning, how well standard statistical model selection procedures can discriminate two-process models from single-process models when learning and retention coefficients were systematically varied. We then built a two-state model for multitarget learning and showed that if an adaptation process is indeed two-rate, then the postadaptation generalization approach primarily probes the slow process, whereas the trial-by-trial generalization approach is most informative about the fast process. The fast process, due to its strong sensitivity to trial error, contributes predominantly to trial-by-trial generalization, whereas the strong retention of the slow system contributes predominantly to postadaptation generalization. Thus, when adaptation can be shown to be two-rate, the two measures of generalization may probe different brain representations of movement direction.

AB - assessed psychophysically in two ways: by testing untrained locations in the work space at the end of adaptation (slow postadaptation generalization) or by determining the influence of an error on the next trial during adaptation (fast trial-by-trial generalization). These two measures of generalization have been widely used in psychophysical studies, but the reason that they might differ has not been addressed explicitly. Our goal was to develop a computational framework for determining when a two-state model is justified by the data and to explore the implications of these two types of generalization for neural representations of movements. We first investigated, for single-target learning, how well standard statistical model selection procedures can discriminate two-process models from single-process models when learning and retention coefficients were systematically varied. We then built a two-state model for multitarget learning and showed that if an adaptation process is indeed two-rate, then the postadaptation generalization approach primarily probes the slow process, whereas the trial-by-trial generalization approach is most informative about the fast process. The fast process, due to its strong sensitivity to trial error, contributes predominantly to trial-by-trial generalization, whereas the strong retention of the slow system contributes predominantly to postadaptation generalization. Thus, when adaptation can be shown to be two-rate, the two measures of generalization may probe different brain representations of movement direction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861171288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861171288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/NECO_a_00262

DO - 10.1162/NECO_a_00262

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 939

EP - 966

JO - Neural Computation

JF - Neural Computation

SN - 0899-7667

IS - 4

ER -