Gendered health systems: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries

Rosemary Morgan, Richard Mangwi Ayiasi, Debjani Barman, Stephen Buzuzi, Charles Ssemugabo, Nkoli Ezumah, Asha S. George, Kate Hawkins, Xiaoning Hao, Rebecca King, Tianyang Liu, Sassy Molyneux, Kelly W. Muraya, David Musoke, Tumaini Nyamhanga, Bandeth Ros, Kassimu Tani, Sally Theobald, Sreytouch Vong, Linda Waldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems. Methods: The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised. Results: Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research. Conclusion: The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number58
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 6 2018

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Research Personnel
Cambodia
Social Values
Zimbabwe
Uganda
Tanzania
Interpersonal Relations
Nigeria
Focus Groups
Administrative Personnel
Caregivers
India
China
Decision Making
Interviews

Keywords

  • Financing
  • Gender
  • Gender analysis
  • Governance
  • Health systems research
  • Human resources for health
  • Intersectionality
  • Service delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Morgan, R., Ayiasi, R. M., Barman, D., Buzuzi, S., Ssemugabo, C., Ezumah, N., ... Waldman, L. (2018). Gendered health systems: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), [58]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5

Gendered health systems : Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. / Morgan, Rosemary; Ayiasi, Richard Mangwi; Barman, Debjani; Buzuzi, Stephen; Ssemugabo, Charles; Ezumah, Nkoli; George, Asha S.; Hawkins, Kate; Hao, Xiaoning; King, Rebecca; Liu, Tianyang; Molyneux, Sassy; Muraya, Kelly W.; Musoke, David; Nyamhanga, Tumaini; Ros, Bandeth; Tani, Kassimu; Theobald, Sally; Vong, Sreytouch; Waldman, Linda.

In: Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, 58, 06.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morgan, R, Ayiasi, RM, Barman, D, Buzuzi, S, Ssemugabo, C, Ezumah, N, George, AS, Hawkins, K, Hao, X, King, R, Liu, T, Molyneux, S, Muraya, KW, Musoke, D, Nyamhanga, T, Ros, B, Tani, K, Theobald, S, Vong, S & Waldman, L 2018, 'Gendered health systems: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries', Health Research Policy and Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5
Morgan, Rosemary ; Ayiasi, Richard Mangwi ; Barman, Debjani ; Buzuzi, Stephen ; Ssemugabo, Charles ; Ezumah, Nkoli ; George, Asha S. ; Hawkins, Kate ; Hao, Xiaoning ; King, Rebecca ; Liu, Tianyang ; Molyneux, Sassy ; Muraya, Kelly W. ; Musoke, David ; Nyamhanga, Tumaini ; Ros, Bandeth ; Tani, Kassimu ; Theobald, Sally ; Vong, Sreytouch ; Waldman, Linda. / Gendered health systems : Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. In: Health Research Policy and Systems. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{0c8aaecfe2eb4b079e89ca847a4a0521,
title = "Gendered health systems: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries",
abstract = "Background: Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems. Methods: The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised. Results: Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research. Conclusion: The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.",
keywords = "Financing, Gender, Gender analysis, Governance, Health systems research, Human resources for health, Intersectionality, Service delivery",
author = "Rosemary Morgan and Ayiasi, {Richard Mangwi} and Debjani Barman and Stephen Buzuzi and Charles Ssemugabo and Nkoli Ezumah and George, {Asha S.} and Kate Hawkins and Xiaoning Hao and Rebecca King and Tianyang Liu and Sassy Molyneux and Muraya, {Kelly W.} and David Musoke and Tumaini Nyamhanga and Bandeth Ros and Kassimu Tani and Sally Theobald and Sreytouch Vong and Linda Waldman",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "Health Research Policy and Systems",
issn = "1478-4505",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gendered health systems

T2 - Evidence from low- and middle-income countries

AU - Morgan, Rosemary

AU - Ayiasi, Richard Mangwi

AU - Barman, Debjani

AU - Buzuzi, Stephen

AU - Ssemugabo, Charles

AU - Ezumah, Nkoli

AU - George, Asha S.

AU - Hawkins, Kate

AU - Hao, Xiaoning

AU - King, Rebecca

AU - Liu, Tianyang

AU - Molyneux, Sassy

AU - Muraya, Kelly W.

AU - Musoke, David

AU - Nyamhanga, Tumaini

AU - Ros, Bandeth

AU - Tani, Kassimu

AU - Theobald, Sally

AU - Vong, Sreytouch

AU - Waldman, Linda

PY - 2018/7/6

Y1 - 2018/7/6

N2 - Background: Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems. Methods: The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised. Results: Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research. Conclusion: The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.

AB - Background: Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems. Methods: The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised. Results: Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research. Conclusion: The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.

KW - Financing

KW - Gender

KW - Gender analysis

KW - Governance

KW - Health systems research

KW - Human resources for health

KW - Intersectionality

KW - Service delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049611928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049611928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5

DO - 10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 29980230

AN - SCOPUS:85049611928

VL - 16

JO - Health Research Policy and Systems

JF - Health Research Policy and Systems

SN - 1478-4505

IS - 1

M1 - 58

ER -