TY - JOUR
T1 - Gendered health systems
T2 - Evidence from low- and middle-income countries
AU - Morgan, Rosemary
AU - Ayiasi, Richard Mangwi
AU - Barman, Debjani
AU - Buzuzi, Stephen
AU - Ssemugabo, Charles
AU - Ezumah, Nkoli
AU - George, Asha S.
AU - Hawkins, Kate
AU - Hao, Xiaoning
AU - King, Rebecca
AU - Liu, Tianyang
AU - Molyneux, Sassy
AU - Muraya, Kelly W.
AU - Musoke, David
AU - Nyamhanga, Tumaini
AU - Ros, Bandeth
AU - Tani, Kassimu
AU - Theobald, Sally
AU - Vong, Sreytouch
AU - Waldman, Linda
N1 - Funding Information:
The research included in this article was funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of low-and middle-income countries [Project No PO5683]. AG is supported by the South African Research Chair’s Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant No 82769). Any opinion, finding and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the authors and DFID and the NRF do not accept any liability in this regard.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/7/6
Y1 - 2018/7/6
N2 - Background: Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems. Methods: The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised. Results: Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research. Conclusion: The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.
AB - Background: Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems. Methods: The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised. Results: Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research. Conclusion: The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.
KW - Financing
KW - Gender
KW - Gender analysis
KW - Governance
KW - Health systems research
KW - Human resources for health
KW - Intersectionality
KW - Service delivery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049611928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049611928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5
DO - 10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 29980230
AN - SCOPUS:85049611928
SN - 1478-4505
VL - 16
JO - Health Research Policy and Systems
JF - Health Research Policy and Systems
IS - 1
M1 - 58
ER -