Gender differences in functional connectivity during emotion regulation

T. Stoica, L. K. Knight, F. Naaz, S. C. Patton, B. E. Depue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Gender differences in emotion regulation (ER) have been postulated, yet their neural basis remains poorly understood. The goal of this study was to investigate this issue from a functional connectivity (FC) perspective. Utilizing a region of interest (ROI) analysis, we investigated whether men and women (N = 48) differed in their FC pattern while viewing versus regulating negative emotion induced by highly salient pictures, and whether this pattern related to their self-reported negative affect and suppression success. Despite women reporting more negative affect, both genders had comparable suppression success. Moreover, differences emerged between men and women's FC patterns. During the regulation of negative emotion, better suppression in women was associated with stronger FC within a cingulo-opercular network, while men exhibited stronger FC within posterior regions of the ventral attentional network. We conclude that due to their propensity for higher emotional reactivity, women may employ a frontal top-down control network to downregulate negative emotion, while men may redirect attention away from the negative stimulus by using posterior regions of the ventral attention network. The findings may have significant implications for understanding women's vulnerability for developing affective disorders and developing targeted individualized treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107829
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume156
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 18 2021

Keywords

  • Emotion regulation
  • Functional connectivity
  • Gender differences
  • ROI-to-ROI analysis
  • Suppression
  • fMRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in functional connectivity during emotion regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this