Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

Srinivas M. Susarla, Gerhard S. Mundinger, Christopher C. Chang, Edward W. Swanson, Denver Lough, S. Alex Rottgers, Richard J. Redett, Anand R. Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to compare the gastrostomy rates in infants with Pierre Robin sequence treated with tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic plastic and reconstructive surgery patients treated over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was surgical intervention (tongue-lip adhesion or distraction osteogenesis). Secondary predictor variables were categorized as demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was the need for gastrostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, costs, and length of stay. Results: Thirty-one tongue-lip adhesion and 30 distraction osteogenesis patients were included in the study. The groups were statistically comparable with regard to demographic and clinical factors (p > 0.18). Gastrostomy rates were higher in patients who underwent tongue-lip adhesion (48 percent) versus those who underwent distraction osteogenesis (16.7 percent; p = 0.008). In an adjusted model, subjects undergoing tongue-lip adhesion were more likely to require gastrostomy tube for nutritional support (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 25.2; p = 0.007). There were two major complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and none in the distraction osteogenesis group. There were three minor complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and five in the distraction osteogenesis group. Total operating room costs were higher for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.05), and total hospital costs and length of stay were higher for tongue-lip adhesion (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among infants with symptomatic Pierre Robin sequence, treatment by distraction osteogenesis is associated with a lower risk for gastrostomy placement for nutritional support. Hospital costs are higher for tongue-lip adhesion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-154
Number of pages6
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume139
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Pierre Robin Syndrome
Distraction Osteogenesis
Gastrostomy
Lip
Tongue
Nutritional Support
Hospital Costs
Length of Stay
Demography
Costs and Cost Analysis
Plastic Surgery
Operating Rooms
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence : A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis. / Susarla, Srinivas M.; Mundinger, Gerhard S.; Chang, Christopher C.; Swanson, Edward W.; Lough, Denver; Rottgers, S. Alex; Redett, Richard J.; Kumar, Anand R.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 149-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Susarla, Srinivas M.; Mundinger, Gerhard S.; Chang, Christopher C.; Swanson, Edward W.; Lough, Denver; Rottgers, S. Alex; Redett, Richard J.; Kumar, Anand R. / Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence : A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 149-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{301d1cc699c64d7ab3502b724d54de5a,
title = "Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis",
abstract = "Background: This study was conducted to compare the gastrostomy rates in infants with Pierre Robin sequence treated with tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic plastic and reconstructive surgery patients treated over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was surgical intervention (tongue-lip adhesion or distraction osteogenesis). Secondary predictor variables were categorized as demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was the need for gastrostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, costs, and length of stay. Results: Thirty-one tongue-lip adhesion and 30 distraction osteogenesis patients were included in the study. The groups were statistically comparable with regard to demographic and clinical factors (p > 0.18). Gastrostomy rates were higher in patients who underwent tongue-lip adhesion (48 percent) versus those who underwent distraction osteogenesis (16.7 percent; p = 0.008). In an adjusted model, subjects undergoing tongue-lip adhesion were more likely to require gastrostomy tube for nutritional support (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 25.2; p = 0.007). There were two major complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and none in the distraction osteogenesis group. There were three minor complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and five in the distraction osteogenesis group. Total operating room costs were higher for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.05), and total hospital costs and length of stay were higher for tongue-lip adhesion (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among infants with symptomatic Pierre Robin sequence, treatment by distraction osteogenesis is associated with a lower risk for gastrostomy placement for nutritional support. Hospital costs are higher for tongue-lip adhesion.",
author = "Susarla, {Srinivas M.} and Mundinger, {Gerhard S.} and Chang, {Christopher C.} and Swanson, {Edward W.} and Denver Lough and Rottgers, {S. Alex} and Redett, {Richard J.} and Kumar, {Anand R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000002865",
volume = "139",
pages = "149--154",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence

T2 - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

AU - Susarla,Srinivas M.

AU - Mundinger,Gerhard S.

AU - Chang,Christopher C.

AU - Swanson,Edward W.

AU - Lough,Denver

AU - Rottgers,S. Alex

AU - Redett,Richard J.

AU - Kumar,Anand R.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: This study was conducted to compare the gastrostomy rates in infants with Pierre Robin sequence treated with tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic plastic and reconstructive surgery patients treated over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was surgical intervention (tongue-lip adhesion or distraction osteogenesis). Secondary predictor variables were categorized as demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was the need for gastrostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, costs, and length of stay. Results: Thirty-one tongue-lip adhesion and 30 distraction osteogenesis patients were included in the study. The groups were statistically comparable with regard to demographic and clinical factors (p > 0.18). Gastrostomy rates were higher in patients who underwent tongue-lip adhesion (48 percent) versus those who underwent distraction osteogenesis (16.7 percent; p = 0.008). In an adjusted model, subjects undergoing tongue-lip adhesion were more likely to require gastrostomy tube for nutritional support (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 25.2; p = 0.007). There were two major complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and none in the distraction osteogenesis group. There were three minor complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and five in the distraction osteogenesis group. Total operating room costs were higher for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.05), and total hospital costs and length of stay were higher for tongue-lip adhesion (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among infants with symptomatic Pierre Robin sequence, treatment by distraction osteogenesis is associated with a lower risk for gastrostomy placement for nutritional support. Hospital costs are higher for tongue-lip adhesion.

AB - Background: This study was conducted to compare the gastrostomy rates in infants with Pierre Robin sequence treated with tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic plastic and reconstructive surgery patients treated over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was surgical intervention (tongue-lip adhesion or distraction osteogenesis). Secondary predictor variables were categorized as demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was the need for gastrostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, costs, and length of stay. Results: Thirty-one tongue-lip adhesion and 30 distraction osteogenesis patients were included in the study. The groups were statistically comparable with regard to demographic and clinical factors (p > 0.18). Gastrostomy rates were higher in patients who underwent tongue-lip adhesion (48 percent) versus those who underwent distraction osteogenesis (16.7 percent; p = 0.008). In an adjusted model, subjects undergoing tongue-lip adhesion were more likely to require gastrostomy tube for nutritional support (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 25.2; p = 0.007). There were two major complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and none in the distraction osteogenesis group. There were three minor complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and five in the distraction osteogenesis group. Total operating room costs were higher for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.05), and total hospital costs and length of stay were higher for tongue-lip adhesion (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among infants with symptomatic Pierre Robin sequence, treatment by distraction osteogenesis is associated with a lower risk for gastrostomy placement for nutritional support. Hospital costs are higher for tongue-lip adhesion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007345932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007345932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002865

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002865

M3 - Article

VL - 139

SP - 149

EP - 154

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 1

ER -