Gap time bias in incident and prevalent cohorts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Multiple event data are frequently encountered in incident and prevalent cohort studies when the multiple events are considered as the major outcomes. For incident cohorts, statistical analysis for the time to the first event, the first gap time, can be conducted using standard techniques in survival analysis under appropriate conditions. These techniques are, nevertheless, inappropriate for analyzing the second gap time because of the presence of induced informative censoring. For prevalent cohorts, because the sample is biased in general, standard methods do not apply to gap times of any order, but techniques for truncated data can be used for the analysis of the first gap time. It is shown that the combined incident and prevalent data form the usual survival data for analysis of the second gap time when certain stationarity conditions are satisfied. The problems are illustrated by a cohort example to study the natural history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1010
Number of pages12
JournalStatistica Sinica
Volume9
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1999

Fingerprint

Informative Censoring
Truncated Data
Cohort Study
Survival Analysis
Survival Data
Stationarity
Virus
Statistical Analysis
Biased
Incidents
Cohort
Standards
History
Human
Survival analysis
Statistical analysis
Cohort study
Censoring

Keywords

  • Gap time
  • Informative censoring
  • Longitudinal studies
  • Multiple events
  • Prevalent cohort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics(all)
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Gap time bias in incident and prevalent cohorts. / Wang, Mei Cheng.

In: Statistica Sinica, Vol. 9, No. 4, 10.1999, p. 999-1010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e780ad46c5b45d3b898a743a54b22eb,
title = "Gap time bias in incident and prevalent cohorts",
abstract = "Multiple event data are frequently encountered in incident and prevalent cohort studies when the multiple events are considered as the major outcomes. For incident cohorts, statistical analysis for the time to the first event, the first gap time, can be conducted using standard techniques in survival analysis under appropriate conditions. These techniques are, nevertheless, inappropriate for analyzing the second gap time because of the presence of induced informative censoring. For prevalent cohorts, because the sample is biased in general, standard methods do not apply to gap times of any order, but techniques for truncated data can be used for the analysis of the first gap time. It is shown that the combined incident and prevalent data form the usual survival data for analysis of the second gap time when certain stationarity conditions are satisfied. The problems are illustrated by a cohort example to study the natural history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).",
keywords = "Gap time, Informative censoring, Longitudinal studies, Multiple events, Prevalent cohort",
author = "Wang, {Mei Cheng}",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "999--1010",
journal = "Statistica Sinica",
issn = "1017-0405",
publisher = "Institute of Statistical Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gap time bias in incident and prevalent cohorts

AU - Wang, Mei Cheng

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - Multiple event data are frequently encountered in incident and prevalent cohort studies when the multiple events are considered as the major outcomes. For incident cohorts, statistical analysis for the time to the first event, the first gap time, can be conducted using standard techniques in survival analysis under appropriate conditions. These techniques are, nevertheless, inappropriate for analyzing the second gap time because of the presence of induced informative censoring. For prevalent cohorts, because the sample is biased in general, standard methods do not apply to gap times of any order, but techniques for truncated data can be used for the analysis of the first gap time. It is shown that the combined incident and prevalent data form the usual survival data for analysis of the second gap time when certain stationarity conditions are satisfied. The problems are illustrated by a cohort example to study the natural history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

AB - Multiple event data are frequently encountered in incident and prevalent cohort studies when the multiple events are considered as the major outcomes. For incident cohorts, statistical analysis for the time to the first event, the first gap time, can be conducted using standard techniques in survival analysis under appropriate conditions. These techniques are, nevertheless, inappropriate for analyzing the second gap time because of the presence of induced informative censoring. For prevalent cohorts, because the sample is biased in general, standard methods do not apply to gap times of any order, but techniques for truncated data can be used for the analysis of the first gap time. It is shown that the combined incident and prevalent data form the usual survival data for analysis of the second gap time when certain stationarity conditions are satisfied. The problems are illustrated by a cohort example to study the natural history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

KW - Gap time

KW - Informative censoring

KW - Longitudinal studies

KW - Multiple events

KW - Prevalent cohort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033268842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033268842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033268842

VL - 9

SP - 999

EP - 1010

JO - Statistica Sinica

JF - Statistica Sinica

SN - 1017-0405

IS - 4

ER -