Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets

Louis P. Hagopian, Griffin W. Rooker, Jennifer R. Zarcone, Andrew C. Bonner, Alexander R. Arevalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hagopian, Rooker, and Zarcone (2015) evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-66
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Self-Injurious Behavior
Datasets
behavior
model
Reinforcement (Psychology)
reinforcement
analysis
Generality
Reinforcement
functional analysis
category
alternative
research
data
Quantitative analysis
Restraint
Replication
Functional analysis
Disruption

Keywords

  • automatic reinforcement
  • functional analysis
  • self-injurious behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB : A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets. / Hagopian, Louis P.; Rooker, Griffin W.; Zarcone, Jennifer R.; Bonner, Andrew C.; Arevalo, Alexander R.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.12.2017, p. 48-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hagopian, Louis P.; Rooker, Griffin W.; Zarcone, Jennifer R.; Bonner, Andrew C.; Arevalo, Alexander R. / Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB : A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.12.2017, p. 48-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2fe028e97244fb996c1b2d65f810229,
title = "Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets",
abstract = "Hagopian, Rooker, and Zarcone (2015) evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.",
keywords = "automatic reinforcement, functional analysis, self-injurious behavior",
author = "Hagopian, {Louis P.} and Rooker, {Griffin W.} and Zarcone, {Jennifer R.} and Bonner, {Andrew C.} and Arevalo, {Alexander R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/jaba.368",
volume = "50",
pages = "48--66",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB

T2 - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

AU - Hagopian,Louis P.

AU - Rooker,Griffin W.

AU - Zarcone,Jennifer R.

AU - Bonner,Andrew C.

AU - Arevalo,Alexander R.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Hagopian, Rooker, and Zarcone (2015) evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.

AB - Hagopian, Rooker, and Zarcone (2015) evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.

KW - automatic reinforcement

KW - functional analysis

KW - self-injurious behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007452573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007452573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jaba.368

DO - 10.1002/jaba.368

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 48

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 1

ER -