Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for a supplemented natural cycle with a programmed cycle protocol for frozen blastocyst transfer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of frozen autologous blastocyst transfers, at a single academic fertility center (519 supplemented natural cycles and 106 programmed cycles). Implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth and birth weight were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test, T-test, or Fisher’s exact test. Results: There was no significant difference between natural and programmed frozen embryo transfers with respect to implantation (21.9 vs. 18.1 %), clinical pregnancy (35.5 vs. 29.2 %), and live birth rates (27.7 vs. 23.6 %). Mean birth weights were also similar between natural and programmed cycles for singletons (3354 vs. 3340 g) and twins (2422 vs. 2294 g) Conclusion: Frozen blastocyst embryo transfers using supplemented natural or programmed protocols experience similar success rates. Patient preference should be considered in choosing a protocol.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1057-1062 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 13 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Frozen embryo transfer
- Natural cycle
- Pregnancy outcome
- Programmed cycle
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Reproductive Medicine
- Genetics
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Developmental Biology
- Genetics(clinical)