TY - JOUR
T1 - From formative research to cultural adaptation of a face-to-face and internet-based cognitive-behavioural intervention for arabic-speaking refugees in germany
AU - Böttche, Maria
AU - Kampisiou, Christina
AU - Stammel, Nadine
AU - El-Haj-Mohamad, Rayan
AU - Heeke, Carina
AU - Burchert, Sebastian
AU - Heim, Eva
AU - Wagner, Birgit
AU - Renneberg, Babette
AU - Böttcher, Johanna
AU - Glaesmer, Heide
AU - Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, Euphrosyne
AU - Zielasek, Jürgen
AU - Konnopka, Alexander
AU - Murray, Laura
AU - Knaevelsrud, Christine
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This project has received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
Publisher Copyright:
© Clinical Psychology in Europe 2021.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: This study aims to provide a transparent and replicable documentation approach for the cultural adaptation of a cognitive-behavioural transdiagnostic intervention (Common Elements Treatment Approach, CETA) for Arabic-speaking refugees with common mental disorders in Germany. Method: A mixed-methods approach was used, including literature review, interviews, expert decisions and questionnaires, in order to adapt the original CETA as well as an internet-based guided version (eCETA). The process of cultural adaptation was based on a conceptual framework and was facilitated by an adaptation monitoring form as well as guidelines which facilitate the reporting of cultural adaptation in psychological trials (RECAPT). Results: Consistent with this form and the guidelines, the decision-making process of adaptation proved to be coherent and stringent. All specificCETA treatment components seem to be suitable for the treatment of Arabic-speaking refugees in Germany. Adaptations were made to three different elements: 1) Cultural concepts of distress: A culturally appropriate explanatory model of symptoms was added; socially accepted terms for expressing symptoms (for eCETA only) and assessing suicidal ideation were adapted; 2) Treatment components: no adaptations for theoretically/empirically based components of the intervention, two adaptations for elements used by the therapist to engage the patient or implement the intervention (nonspecificelements), seven adaptations for skills implemented during sessions (therapeutic techniques; two for eCETA only) and 3) Treatment delivery: 21 surface adaptations (10 for eCETA only), two eCETA-only adaptations regarding the format. Conclusion: The conceptual framework and the RECAPT guidelines simplify, standardise and clarify the cultural adaptation process.
AB - Background: This study aims to provide a transparent and replicable documentation approach for the cultural adaptation of a cognitive-behavioural transdiagnostic intervention (Common Elements Treatment Approach, CETA) for Arabic-speaking refugees with common mental disorders in Germany. Method: A mixed-methods approach was used, including literature review, interviews, expert decisions and questionnaires, in order to adapt the original CETA as well as an internet-based guided version (eCETA). The process of cultural adaptation was based on a conceptual framework and was facilitated by an adaptation monitoring form as well as guidelines which facilitate the reporting of cultural adaptation in psychological trials (RECAPT). Results: Consistent with this form and the guidelines, the decision-making process of adaptation proved to be coherent and stringent. All specificCETA treatment components seem to be suitable for the treatment of Arabic-speaking refugees in Germany. Adaptations were made to three different elements: 1) Cultural concepts of distress: A culturally appropriate explanatory model of symptoms was added; socially accepted terms for expressing symptoms (for eCETA only) and assessing suicidal ideation were adapted; 2) Treatment components: no adaptations for theoretically/empirically based components of the intervention, two adaptations for elements used by the therapist to engage the patient or implement the intervention (nonspecificelements), seven adaptations for skills implemented during sessions (therapeutic techniques; two for eCETA only) and 3) Treatment delivery: 21 surface adaptations (10 for eCETA only), two eCETA-only adaptations regarding the format. Conclusion: The conceptual framework and the RECAPT guidelines simplify, standardise and clarify the cultural adaptation process.
KW - Cultural adaptation
KW - Decision-making process
KW - Refugees
KW - Transdiagnostic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120744869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120744869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.32872/cpe.4623
DO - 10.32872/cpe.4623
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120744869
SN - 2625-3410
VL - 3
JO - Clinical Psychology in Europe
JF - Clinical Psychology in Europe
M1 - e4623
ER -