Frits went's atomic age greenhouse: The changing labscape on the lab-field border

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Landscapes and Labscapes Robert Kohler emphasized the separation between laboratory and field cultures and the creation of new "hybrid" or mixed practices as field sciences matured in the early twentieth century. This article explores related changes in laboratory practices, especially novel designs for the analysis of organism-environment relations in the mid-twentieth century. American ecologist Victor Shelford argued in 1929 that technological improvements and indoor climate control should be applied to ecological laboratories, but his recommendations were too ambitious for the time. In the postwar period Frits W. Went, plant physiologist at the California Institute of Technology, created a new high-tech laboratory, dubbed a "phytotron", in the hope that it would transform plant sciences by allowing for unprecedented control of environmental variables. Went's aspirations, the research conducted in his laboratory, and its impact in initiating an international movement, are considered. Went's laboratory can be seen as a "hybrid culture" evolving in the laboratory, complementing and intersecting with some of the field practices that Kohler describes. It was also a countercultural movement against the reductionist trends of molecular biology in the 1950s and 1960s. By considering the history of the laboratory in relation to field sciences, we can explore how new funding sources and cross-disciplinary relations affected the development of field sciences, especially in the postwar period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-324
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of the History of Biology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

greenhouses
Air Conditioning
physiologists
ecologists
funding
molecular biology
Molecular Biology
History
Technology
climate
history
environmental factors
organisms
Research
Field Science
Post-war Period

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Ecology
  • Field science
  • Frits W. Went
  • Phytotron
  • Plant physiology
  • Victor E. Shelford

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Frits went's atomic age greenhouse : The changing labscape on the lab-field border. / Kingsland, Sharon E.

In: Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 42, No. 2, 05.2009, p. 289-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aebf7c383189428fb6d812ff8549fae8,
title = "Frits went's atomic age greenhouse: The changing labscape on the lab-field border",
abstract = "In Landscapes and Labscapes Robert Kohler emphasized the separation between laboratory and field cultures and the creation of new {"}hybrid{"} or mixed practices as field sciences matured in the early twentieth century. This article explores related changes in laboratory practices, especially novel designs for the analysis of organism-environment relations in the mid-twentieth century. American ecologist Victor Shelford argued in 1929 that technological improvements and indoor climate control should be applied to ecological laboratories, but his recommendations were too ambitious for the time. In the postwar period Frits W. Went, plant physiologist at the California Institute of Technology, created a new high-tech laboratory, dubbed a {"}phytotron{"}, in the hope that it would transform plant sciences by allowing for unprecedented control of environmental variables. Went's aspirations, the research conducted in his laboratory, and its impact in initiating an international movement, are considered. Went's laboratory can be seen as a {"}hybrid culture{"} evolving in the laboratory, complementing and intersecting with some of the field practices that Kohler describes. It was also a countercultural movement against the reductionist trends of molecular biology in the 1950s and 1960s. By considering the history of the laboratory in relation to field sciences, we can explore how new funding sources and cross-disciplinary relations affected the development of field sciences, especially in the postwar period.",
keywords = "Agriculture, California Institute of Technology, Ecology, Field science, Frits W. Went, Phytotron, Plant physiology, Victor E. Shelford",
author = "Kingsland, {Sharon E}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10739-009-9179-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "289--324",
journal = "Journal of the History of Biology",
issn = "0022-5010",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frits went's atomic age greenhouse

T2 - The changing labscape on the lab-field border

AU - Kingsland, Sharon E

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - In Landscapes and Labscapes Robert Kohler emphasized the separation between laboratory and field cultures and the creation of new "hybrid" or mixed practices as field sciences matured in the early twentieth century. This article explores related changes in laboratory practices, especially novel designs for the analysis of organism-environment relations in the mid-twentieth century. American ecologist Victor Shelford argued in 1929 that technological improvements and indoor climate control should be applied to ecological laboratories, but his recommendations were too ambitious for the time. In the postwar period Frits W. Went, plant physiologist at the California Institute of Technology, created a new high-tech laboratory, dubbed a "phytotron", in the hope that it would transform plant sciences by allowing for unprecedented control of environmental variables. Went's aspirations, the research conducted in his laboratory, and its impact in initiating an international movement, are considered. Went's laboratory can be seen as a "hybrid culture" evolving in the laboratory, complementing and intersecting with some of the field practices that Kohler describes. It was also a countercultural movement against the reductionist trends of molecular biology in the 1950s and 1960s. By considering the history of the laboratory in relation to field sciences, we can explore how new funding sources and cross-disciplinary relations affected the development of field sciences, especially in the postwar period.

AB - In Landscapes and Labscapes Robert Kohler emphasized the separation between laboratory and field cultures and the creation of new "hybrid" or mixed practices as field sciences matured in the early twentieth century. This article explores related changes in laboratory practices, especially novel designs for the analysis of organism-environment relations in the mid-twentieth century. American ecologist Victor Shelford argued in 1929 that technological improvements and indoor climate control should be applied to ecological laboratories, but his recommendations were too ambitious for the time. In the postwar period Frits W. Went, plant physiologist at the California Institute of Technology, created a new high-tech laboratory, dubbed a "phytotron", in the hope that it would transform plant sciences by allowing for unprecedented control of environmental variables. Went's aspirations, the research conducted in his laboratory, and its impact in initiating an international movement, are considered. Went's laboratory can be seen as a "hybrid culture" evolving in the laboratory, complementing and intersecting with some of the field practices that Kohler describes. It was also a countercultural movement against the reductionist trends of molecular biology in the 1950s and 1960s. By considering the history of the laboratory in relation to field sciences, we can explore how new funding sources and cross-disciplinary relations affected the development of field sciences, especially in the postwar period.

KW - Agriculture

KW - California Institute of Technology

KW - Ecology

KW - Field science

KW - Frits W. Went

KW - Phytotron

KW - Plant physiology

KW - Victor E. Shelford

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68149166539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68149166539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10739-009-9179-y

DO - 10.1007/s10739-009-9179-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 19852398

AN - SCOPUS:68149166539

VL - 42

SP - 289

EP - 324

JO - Journal of the History of Biology

JF - Journal of the History of Biology

SN - 0022-5010

IS - 2

ER -