Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing

David Schretlen, S. Marc Testa, Jessica M. Winicki, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Barry Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The frequency and determinants of abnormal test performance by normal individuals are critically important to clinical inference. Here we compare two approaches to predicting rates of abnormal test performance among healthy individuals with the rates actually shown by 327 neurologically normal adults aged 18-92 years. We counted how many participants produced abnormal scores, defined by three different cutoffs with test batteries of varied length, and the number of abnormal scores they produced. Observed rates generally were closer to predictions based on a series of Monte Carlo simulations than on the binomial model. They increased with the number of tests administered, decreased as more stringent cutoffs were used to identify abnormality, varied with the degree of correlation among test scores, and depended on individual differences in age, education, race, sex, and estimated premorbid IQ. Adjusting scores for demographic variables and premorbid IQ did not reduce rates of abnormal performance. However, it eliminated the contribution of these variables to rates of abnormal test performance. These findings raise fundamental questions about the nature and interpretation of abnormal test performance by normal, healthy adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-445
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Sex Education
Statistical Models
Individuality
Demography

Keywords

  • Binomial
  • Classification
  • Cognition disorders
  • Diagnostic errors
  • Models
  • Monte Carlo method
  • Neuropsychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing. / Schretlen, David; Testa, S. Marc; Winicki, Jessica M.; Pearlson, Godfrey D.; Gordon, Barry.

In: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 14, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 436-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6256e5338f5b4347bb31de69a90df3cf,
title = "Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing",
abstract = "The frequency and determinants of abnormal test performance by normal individuals are critically important to clinical inference. Here we compare two approaches to predicting rates of abnormal test performance among healthy individuals with the rates actually shown by 327 neurologically normal adults aged 18-92 years. We counted how many participants produced abnormal scores, defined by three different cutoffs with test batteries of varied length, and the number of abnormal scores they produced. Observed rates generally were closer to predictions based on a series of Monte Carlo simulations than on the binomial model. They increased with the number of tests administered, decreased as more stringent cutoffs were used to identify abnormality, varied with the degree of correlation among test scores, and depended on individual differences in age, education, race, sex, and estimated premorbid IQ. Adjusting scores for demographic variables and premorbid IQ did not reduce rates of abnormal performance. However, it eliminated the contribution of these variables to rates of abnormal test performance. These findings raise fundamental questions about the nature and interpretation of abnormal test performance by normal, healthy adults.",
keywords = "Binomial, Classification, Cognition disorders, Diagnostic errors, Models, Monte Carlo method, Neuropsychology",
author = "David Schretlen and Testa, {S. Marc} and Winicki, {Jessica M.} and Pearlson, {Godfrey D.} and Barry Gordon",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S1355617708080387",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "436--445",
journal = "Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society",
issn = "1355-6177",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing

AU - Schretlen, David

AU - Testa, S. Marc

AU - Winicki, Jessica M.

AU - Pearlson, Godfrey D.

AU - Gordon, Barry

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - The frequency and determinants of abnormal test performance by normal individuals are critically important to clinical inference. Here we compare two approaches to predicting rates of abnormal test performance among healthy individuals with the rates actually shown by 327 neurologically normal adults aged 18-92 years. We counted how many participants produced abnormal scores, defined by three different cutoffs with test batteries of varied length, and the number of abnormal scores they produced. Observed rates generally were closer to predictions based on a series of Monte Carlo simulations than on the binomial model. They increased with the number of tests administered, decreased as more stringent cutoffs were used to identify abnormality, varied with the degree of correlation among test scores, and depended on individual differences in age, education, race, sex, and estimated premorbid IQ. Adjusting scores for demographic variables and premorbid IQ did not reduce rates of abnormal performance. However, it eliminated the contribution of these variables to rates of abnormal test performance. These findings raise fundamental questions about the nature and interpretation of abnormal test performance by normal, healthy adults.

AB - The frequency and determinants of abnormal test performance by normal individuals are critically important to clinical inference. Here we compare two approaches to predicting rates of abnormal test performance among healthy individuals with the rates actually shown by 327 neurologically normal adults aged 18-92 years. We counted how many participants produced abnormal scores, defined by three different cutoffs with test batteries of varied length, and the number of abnormal scores they produced. Observed rates generally were closer to predictions based on a series of Monte Carlo simulations than on the binomial model. They increased with the number of tests administered, decreased as more stringent cutoffs were used to identify abnormality, varied with the degree of correlation among test scores, and depended on individual differences in age, education, race, sex, and estimated premorbid IQ. Adjusting scores for demographic variables and premorbid IQ did not reduce rates of abnormal performance. However, it eliminated the contribution of these variables to rates of abnormal test performance. These findings raise fundamental questions about the nature and interpretation of abnormal test performance by normal, healthy adults.

KW - Binomial

KW - Classification

KW - Cognition disorders

KW - Diagnostic errors

KW - Models

KW - Monte Carlo method

KW - Neuropsychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42449085772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42449085772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355617708080387

DO - 10.1017/S1355617708080387

M3 - Article

C2 - 18419842

AN - SCOPUS:42449085772

VL - 14

SP - 436

EP - 445

JO - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

JF - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

SN - 1355-6177

IS - 3

ER -