Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Jefferson R. Wilson, Kris Radcliff, Gregory Schroeder, Madison Booth, Christopher Lucasti, Michael Fehlings, Nassr Ahmad, Alexander Vaccaro, Paul Arnold, Daniel Sciubba, Alex Ching, Justin Smith, Christopher Shaffrey, Kern Singh, Bruce Darden, Scott Daffner, Ivan Cheng, Zoher Ghogawala, Steven Ludwig, Jacob Buchowski & 9 others Darrel Brodke, Jeffrey Wang, Ronald A. Lehman, Alan Hilibrand, Tim Yoon, Jonathan Grauer, Andrew Dailey, Michael Steinmetz, James S. Harrop

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a low but well-established profile of adverse events. The goal of this study was to gauge surgeon opinion regarding the frequency and acceptability of these events. Methods: A 2-page survey was distributed to attendees at the 2015 Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) meeting. Respondents were asked to categorize 18 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-related adverse events as either: "common and acceptable," "uncommon and acceptable," "uncommon and sometimes acceptable," or "uncommon and unacceptable." Results were compiled to generate the relative frequency of these responses for each complication. Responses for each complication event were also compared between respondents based on practice location (US vs. non-US), primary specialty (orthopedics vs. neurosurgery) and years in practice. Results: Of 150 surveys distributed, 115 responses were received (76.7% response rate), with the majority of respondents found to be US-based (71.3%) orthopedic surgeons (82.6%). Wrong level surgery, esophageal injury, retained drain, and spinal cord injury were considered by most to be unacceptable and uncommon complications. Dysphagia and adjacent segment disease occurred most often, but were deemed acceptable complications. Although surgeon experience and primary specialty had little impact on responses, practice location was found to significantly influence responses for 12 of 18 complications, with non-US surgeons found to categorize events more toward the uncommon and unacceptable end of the spectrum as compared with US surgeons. Conclusions: These results serve to aid communication and transparency within the field of spine surgery, and will help to inform future quality improvement and best practice initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E270-E277
JournalClinical Spine Surgery
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Spine
Neurosurgery
Deglutition Disorders
Quality Improvement
Spinal Cord Injuries
Practice Guidelines
varespladib methyl
Orthopedics
Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
  • cervical spine
  • complications
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Wilson, J. R., Radcliff, K., Schroeder, G., Booth, M., Lucasti, C., Fehlings, M., ... Harrop, J. S. (2018). Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clinical Spine Surgery, 31(5), E270-E277. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000645

Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. / Wilson, Jefferson R.; Radcliff, Kris; Schroeder, Gregory; Booth, Madison; Lucasti, Christopher; Fehlings, Michael; Ahmad, Nassr; Vaccaro, Alexander; Arnold, Paul; Sciubba, Daniel; Ching, Alex; Smith, Justin; Shaffrey, Christopher; Singh, Kern; Darden, Bruce; Daffner, Scott; Cheng, Ivan; Ghogawala, Zoher; Ludwig, Steven; Buchowski, Jacob; Brodke, Darrel; Wang, Jeffrey; Lehman, Ronald A.; Hilibrand, Alan; Yoon, Tim; Grauer, Jonathan; Dailey, Andrew; Steinmetz, Michael; Harrop, James S.

In: Clinical Spine Surgery, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.01.2018, p. E270-E277.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Wilson, JR, Radcliff, K, Schroeder, G, Booth, M, Lucasti, C, Fehlings, M, Ahmad, N, Vaccaro, A, Arnold, P, Sciubba, D, Ching, A, Smith, J, Shaffrey, C, Singh, K, Darden, B, Daffner, S, Cheng, I, Ghogawala, Z, Ludwig, S, Buchowski, J, Brodke, D, Wang, J, Lehman, RA, Hilibrand, A, Yoon, T, Grauer, J, Dailey, A, Steinmetz, M & Harrop, JS 2018, 'Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion', Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. E270-E277. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000645
Wilson JR, Radcliff K, Schroeder G, Booth M, Lucasti C, Fehlings M et al. Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2018 Jan 1;31(5):E270-E277. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000645
Wilson, Jefferson R. ; Radcliff, Kris ; Schroeder, Gregory ; Booth, Madison ; Lucasti, Christopher ; Fehlings, Michael ; Ahmad, Nassr ; Vaccaro, Alexander ; Arnold, Paul ; Sciubba, Daniel ; Ching, Alex ; Smith, Justin ; Shaffrey, Christopher ; Singh, Kern ; Darden, Bruce ; Daffner, Scott ; Cheng, Ivan ; Ghogawala, Zoher ; Ludwig, Steven ; Buchowski, Jacob ; Brodke, Darrel ; Wang, Jeffrey ; Lehman, Ronald A. ; Hilibrand, Alan ; Yoon, Tim ; Grauer, Jonathan ; Dailey, Andrew ; Steinmetz, Michael ; Harrop, James S. / Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. In: Clinical Spine Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. E270-E277.
@article{ab3bf3710f0b43fc8be6da755a97a870,
title = "Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion",
abstract = "Purpose: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a low but well-established profile of adverse events. The goal of this study was to gauge surgeon opinion regarding the frequency and acceptability of these events. Methods: A 2-page survey was distributed to attendees at the 2015 Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) meeting. Respondents were asked to categorize 18 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-related adverse events as either: {"}common and acceptable,{"} {"}uncommon and acceptable,{"} {"}uncommon and sometimes acceptable,{"} or {"}uncommon and unacceptable.{"} Results were compiled to generate the relative frequency of these responses for each complication. Responses for each complication event were also compared between respondents based on practice location (US vs. non-US), primary specialty (orthopedics vs. neurosurgery) and years in practice. Results: Of 150 surveys distributed, 115 responses were received (76.7{\%} response rate), with the majority of respondents found to be US-based (71.3{\%}) orthopedic surgeons (82.6{\%}). Wrong level surgery, esophageal injury, retained drain, and spinal cord injury were considered by most to be unacceptable and uncommon complications. Dysphagia and adjacent segment disease occurred most often, but were deemed acceptable complications. Although surgeon experience and primary specialty had little impact on responses, practice location was found to significantly influence responses for 12 of 18 complications, with non-US surgeons found to categorize events more toward the uncommon and unacceptable end of the spectrum as compared with US surgeons. Conclusions: These results serve to aid communication and transparency within the field of spine surgery, and will help to inform future quality improvement and best practice initiatives.",
keywords = "adverse events, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical spine, complications, survey",
author = "Wilson, {Jefferson R.} and Kris Radcliff and Gregory Schroeder and Madison Booth and Christopher Lucasti and Michael Fehlings and Nassr Ahmad and Alexander Vaccaro and Paul Arnold and Daniel Sciubba and Alex Ching and Justin Smith and Christopher Shaffrey and Kern Singh and Bruce Darden and Scott Daffner and Ivan Cheng and Zoher Ghogawala and Steven Ludwig and Jacob Buchowski and Darrel Brodke and Jeffrey Wang and Lehman, {Ronald A.} and Alan Hilibrand and Tim Yoon and Jonathan Grauer and Andrew Dailey and Michael Steinmetz and Harrop, {James S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0000000000000645",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "E270--E277",
journal = "Clinical Spine Surgery",
issn = "2380-0186",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency and acceptability of adverse events after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

AU - Wilson, Jefferson R.

AU - Radcliff, Kris

AU - Schroeder, Gregory

AU - Booth, Madison

AU - Lucasti, Christopher

AU - Fehlings, Michael

AU - Ahmad, Nassr

AU - Vaccaro, Alexander

AU - Arnold, Paul

AU - Sciubba, Daniel

AU - Ching, Alex

AU - Smith, Justin

AU - Shaffrey, Christopher

AU - Singh, Kern

AU - Darden, Bruce

AU - Daffner, Scott

AU - Cheng, Ivan

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Ludwig, Steven

AU - Buchowski, Jacob

AU - Brodke, Darrel

AU - Wang, Jeffrey

AU - Lehman, Ronald A.

AU - Hilibrand, Alan

AU - Yoon, Tim

AU - Grauer, Jonathan

AU - Dailey, Andrew

AU - Steinmetz, Michael

AU - Harrop, James S.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a low but well-established profile of adverse events. The goal of this study was to gauge surgeon opinion regarding the frequency and acceptability of these events. Methods: A 2-page survey was distributed to attendees at the 2015 Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) meeting. Respondents were asked to categorize 18 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-related adverse events as either: "common and acceptable," "uncommon and acceptable," "uncommon and sometimes acceptable," or "uncommon and unacceptable." Results were compiled to generate the relative frequency of these responses for each complication. Responses for each complication event were also compared between respondents based on practice location (US vs. non-US), primary specialty (orthopedics vs. neurosurgery) and years in practice. Results: Of 150 surveys distributed, 115 responses were received (76.7% response rate), with the majority of respondents found to be US-based (71.3%) orthopedic surgeons (82.6%). Wrong level surgery, esophageal injury, retained drain, and spinal cord injury were considered by most to be unacceptable and uncommon complications. Dysphagia and adjacent segment disease occurred most often, but were deemed acceptable complications. Although surgeon experience and primary specialty had little impact on responses, practice location was found to significantly influence responses for 12 of 18 complications, with non-US surgeons found to categorize events more toward the uncommon and unacceptable end of the spectrum as compared with US surgeons. Conclusions: These results serve to aid communication and transparency within the field of spine surgery, and will help to inform future quality improvement and best practice initiatives.

AB - Purpose: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a low but well-established profile of adverse events. The goal of this study was to gauge surgeon opinion regarding the frequency and acceptability of these events. Methods: A 2-page survey was distributed to attendees at the 2015 Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) meeting. Respondents were asked to categorize 18 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-related adverse events as either: "common and acceptable," "uncommon and acceptable," "uncommon and sometimes acceptable," or "uncommon and unacceptable." Results were compiled to generate the relative frequency of these responses for each complication. Responses for each complication event were also compared between respondents based on practice location (US vs. non-US), primary specialty (orthopedics vs. neurosurgery) and years in practice. Results: Of 150 surveys distributed, 115 responses were received (76.7% response rate), with the majority of respondents found to be US-based (71.3%) orthopedic surgeons (82.6%). Wrong level surgery, esophageal injury, retained drain, and spinal cord injury were considered by most to be unacceptable and uncommon complications. Dysphagia and adjacent segment disease occurred most often, but were deemed acceptable complications. Although surgeon experience and primary specialty had little impact on responses, practice location was found to significantly influence responses for 12 of 18 complications, with non-US surgeons found to categorize events more toward the uncommon and unacceptable end of the spectrum as compared with US surgeons. Conclusions: These results serve to aid communication and transparency within the field of spine surgery, and will help to inform future quality improvement and best practice initiatives.

KW - adverse events

KW - Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

KW - cervical spine

KW - complications

KW - survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048222544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048222544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000645

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000645

M3 - Review article

VL - 31

SP - E270-E277

JO - Clinical Spine Surgery

JF - Clinical Spine Surgery

SN - 2380-0186

IS - 5

ER -