Freedom from Infection: Confirming Interruption of Malaria Transmission

Gillian Stresman, Angus Cameron, Chris Drakeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The global reductions in disease burden and the continued spread of drug and insecticide resistance make malaria elimination both viable and imperative, although this may be more easily achieved in some settings compared to others. Whilst the focus has been on optimal approaches to achieve elimination, less attention has been paid to how to measure the absence of malaria. Measuring the absence of transmission poses a specific challenge in that it involves proving a negative. The concept of freedom from infection, routinely used in veterinary epidemiology, can provide quantitative and reproducible estimates that, if infections were present above a predefined (low) threshold, they would be detected with a known uncertainty. Additionally, these methods are adaptable for both passively and actively collected data as well as combining information when multiple surveillance streams are available. Here we discuss the potential application of this approach to malaria. Evidence-based approaches for informing public health decision-making in the context of disease elimination are currently lacking.Tools developed in veterinary epidemiology can generate quantitative and reproducible estimates for the probability of detecting disease were it present at a pre-specified (low) level.Passive case detection can be augmented with actively collected data to generate an overall estimate of the sensitivity of the surveillance system and corresponding estimates of freedom from infection.Historical data can be incorporated into estimates of freedom with appropriate weighting according to the probability that infection is introduced into the population.For malaria control programs that are reorienting surveillance for elimination certification, freedom from infection estimates provide a potential standardized approach for informing decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTrends in Parasitology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Malaria
Infection
Decision Making
Epidemiology
Insecticide Resistance
Disease Eradication
Certification
Drug Resistance
Uncertainty
Public Health
Population

Keywords

  • Active surveillance
  • Elimination
  • Negative reporting
  • Passive surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Freedom from Infection : Confirming Interruption of Malaria Transmission. / Stresman, Gillian; Cameron, Angus; Drakeley, Chris.

In: Trends in Parasitology, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stresman, Gillian ; Cameron, Angus ; Drakeley, Chris. / Freedom from Infection : Confirming Interruption of Malaria Transmission. In: Trends in Parasitology. 2016.
@article{3635e5bd9a364f558b8829d4d2c47fb7,
title = "Freedom from Infection: Confirming Interruption of Malaria Transmission",
abstract = "The global reductions in disease burden and the continued spread of drug and insecticide resistance make malaria elimination both viable and imperative, although this may be more easily achieved in some settings compared to others. Whilst the focus has been on optimal approaches to achieve elimination, less attention has been paid to how to measure the absence of malaria. Measuring the absence of transmission poses a specific challenge in that it involves proving a negative. The concept of freedom from infection, routinely used in veterinary epidemiology, can provide quantitative and reproducible estimates that, if infections were present above a predefined (low) threshold, they would be detected with a known uncertainty. Additionally, these methods are adaptable for both passively and actively collected data as well as combining information when multiple surveillance streams are available. Here we discuss the potential application of this approach to malaria. Evidence-based approaches for informing public health decision-making in the context of disease elimination are currently lacking.Tools developed in veterinary epidemiology can generate quantitative and reproducible estimates for the probability of detecting disease were it present at a pre-specified (low) level.Passive case detection can be augmented with actively collected data to generate an overall estimate of the sensitivity of the surveillance system and corresponding estimates of freedom from infection.Historical data can be incorporated into estimates of freedom with appropriate weighting according to the probability that infection is introduced into the population.For malaria control programs that are reorienting surveillance for elimination certification, freedom from infection estimates provide a potential standardized approach for informing decision-making.",
keywords = "Active surveillance, Elimination, Negative reporting, Passive surveillance",
author = "Gillian Stresman and Angus Cameron and Chris Drakeley",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.pt.2016.12.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Trends in Parasitology",
issn = "1471-4922",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Freedom from Infection

T2 - Confirming Interruption of Malaria Transmission

AU - Stresman, Gillian

AU - Cameron, Angus

AU - Drakeley, Chris

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The global reductions in disease burden and the continued spread of drug and insecticide resistance make malaria elimination both viable and imperative, although this may be more easily achieved in some settings compared to others. Whilst the focus has been on optimal approaches to achieve elimination, less attention has been paid to how to measure the absence of malaria. Measuring the absence of transmission poses a specific challenge in that it involves proving a negative. The concept of freedom from infection, routinely used in veterinary epidemiology, can provide quantitative and reproducible estimates that, if infections were present above a predefined (low) threshold, they would be detected with a known uncertainty. Additionally, these methods are adaptable for both passively and actively collected data as well as combining information when multiple surveillance streams are available. Here we discuss the potential application of this approach to malaria. Evidence-based approaches for informing public health decision-making in the context of disease elimination are currently lacking.Tools developed in veterinary epidemiology can generate quantitative and reproducible estimates for the probability of detecting disease were it present at a pre-specified (low) level.Passive case detection can be augmented with actively collected data to generate an overall estimate of the sensitivity of the surveillance system and corresponding estimates of freedom from infection.Historical data can be incorporated into estimates of freedom with appropriate weighting according to the probability that infection is introduced into the population.For malaria control programs that are reorienting surveillance for elimination certification, freedom from infection estimates provide a potential standardized approach for informing decision-making.

AB - The global reductions in disease burden and the continued spread of drug and insecticide resistance make malaria elimination both viable and imperative, although this may be more easily achieved in some settings compared to others. Whilst the focus has been on optimal approaches to achieve elimination, less attention has been paid to how to measure the absence of malaria. Measuring the absence of transmission poses a specific challenge in that it involves proving a negative. The concept of freedom from infection, routinely used in veterinary epidemiology, can provide quantitative and reproducible estimates that, if infections were present above a predefined (low) threshold, they would be detected with a known uncertainty. Additionally, these methods are adaptable for both passively and actively collected data as well as combining information when multiple surveillance streams are available. Here we discuss the potential application of this approach to malaria. Evidence-based approaches for informing public health decision-making in the context of disease elimination are currently lacking.Tools developed in veterinary epidemiology can generate quantitative and reproducible estimates for the probability of detecting disease were it present at a pre-specified (low) level.Passive case detection can be augmented with actively collected data to generate an overall estimate of the sensitivity of the surveillance system and corresponding estimates of freedom from infection.Historical data can be incorporated into estimates of freedom with appropriate weighting according to the probability that infection is introduced into the population.For malaria control programs that are reorienting surveillance for elimination certification, freedom from infection estimates provide a potential standardized approach for informing decision-making.

KW - Active surveillance

KW - Elimination

KW - Negative reporting

KW - Passive surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009820146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009820146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pt.2016.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.pt.2016.12.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 28108199

AN - SCOPUS:85009820146

JO - Trends in Parasitology

JF - Trends in Parasitology

SN - 1471-4922

ER -