Free Will, Self-Governance and Neuroscience: An Overview

Alisa Carse, Hilary Bok, Debra J Mathews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Given dramatic increases in recent decades in the pace of scientific discovery and understanding of the functional organization of the brain, it is increasingly clear that engagement with the neuroscientific literature and research is central to making progress on philosophical questions regarding the nature and scope of human freedom and responsibility. While patterns of brain activity cannot provide the whole story, developing a deeper and more precise understanding of how brain activity is related to human choice and conduct is crucial to the development of realistic, just, and intellectually rigorous models of human agency and moral responsibility. In this special issue, we acknowledge that “free will” and “moral responsibility” are not concepts with which neuroscience can directly engage, and instead focus on self-governance, and the capacities that contribute to self-governance, which are more tractable for scientific investigation and are prerequisites for the presence of moral responsibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNeuroethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Personal Autonomy
Neurosciences
Brain
Research

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Free will
  • Moral responsibility
  • Neuroscience
  • Self-governance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Health Policy
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Free Will, Self-Governance and Neuroscience : An Overview. / Carse, Alisa; Bok, Hilary; Mathews, Debra J.

In: Neuroethics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9ab0f5af5b044d978fe08f1d73476139,
title = "Free Will, Self-Governance and Neuroscience: An Overview",
abstract = "Given dramatic increases in recent decades in the pace of scientific discovery and understanding of the functional organization of the brain, it is increasingly clear that engagement with the neuroscientific literature and research is central to making progress on philosophical questions regarding the nature and scope of human freedom and responsibility. While patterns of brain activity cannot provide the whole story, developing a deeper and more precise understanding of how brain activity is related to human choice and conduct is crucial to the development of realistic, just, and intellectually rigorous models of human agency and moral responsibility. In this special issue, we acknowledge that “free will” and “moral responsibility” are not concepts with which neuroscience can directly engage, and instead focus on self-governance, and the capacities that contribute to self-governance, which are more tractable for scientific investigation and are prerequisites for the presence of moral responsibility.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Free will, Moral responsibility, Neuroscience, Self-governance",
author = "Alisa Carse and Hilary Bok and Mathews, {Debra J}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12152-018-9376-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Neuroethics",
issn = "1874-5490",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Free Will, Self-Governance and Neuroscience

T2 - An Overview

AU - Carse, Alisa

AU - Bok, Hilary

AU - Mathews, Debra J

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Given dramatic increases in recent decades in the pace of scientific discovery and understanding of the functional organization of the brain, it is increasingly clear that engagement with the neuroscientific literature and research is central to making progress on philosophical questions regarding the nature and scope of human freedom and responsibility. While patterns of brain activity cannot provide the whole story, developing a deeper and more precise understanding of how brain activity is related to human choice and conduct is crucial to the development of realistic, just, and intellectually rigorous models of human agency and moral responsibility. In this special issue, we acknowledge that “free will” and “moral responsibility” are not concepts with which neuroscience can directly engage, and instead focus on self-governance, and the capacities that contribute to self-governance, which are more tractable for scientific investigation and are prerequisites for the presence of moral responsibility.

AB - Given dramatic increases in recent decades in the pace of scientific discovery and understanding of the functional organization of the brain, it is increasingly clear that engagement with the neuroscientific literature and research is central to making progress on philosophical questions regarding the nature and scope of human freedom and responsibility. While patterns of brain activity cannot provide the whole story, developing a deeper and more precise understanding of how brain activity is related to human choice and conduct is crucial to the development of realistic, just, and intellectually rigorous models of human agency and moral responsibility. In this special issue, we acknowledge that “free will” and “moral responsibility” are not concepts with which neuroscience can directly engage, and instead focus on self-governance, and the capacities that contribute to self-governance, which are more tractable for scientific investigation and are prerequisites for the presence of moral responsibility.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Free will

KW - Moral responsibility

KW - Neuroscience

KW - Self-governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051754151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051754151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12152-018-9376-5

DO - 10.1007/s12152-018-9376-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051754151

JO - Neuroethics

JF - Neuroethics

SN - 1874-5490

ER -