Frailty: An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies

Howard Bergman, Luigi Ferrucci, Jack Guralnik, David B. Hogan, Silvia Hummel, Sathya Karunananthan, Christina Wolfson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Clinicians and researchers have shown increasing interest in frailty. Yet, there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the concept and its definition. In this article, we present perspectives on key issues and controversies discussed by scientists from 13 different countries, representing a diverse range of disciplines, at the 2006 Second International Working Meeting on Frailty and Aging. The following fundamental questions are discussed: What is the distinction, if any, between frailty and aging? What is its relationship with chronic disease? Is frailty a syndrome or a series of age-related impairments that predict adverse outcomes? What are the critical domains in its operational definition? Is frailty a useful concept? The implications of different models and approaches are examined. Although consensus has yet to be attained, work accomplished to date has opened exciting new horizons. The article concludes with suggested directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-737
Number of pages7
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Volume62
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Chronic Disease
Research Personnel
Research
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

Bergman, H., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J., Hogan, D. B., Hummel, S., Karunananthan, S., & Wolfson, C. (2007). Frailty: An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 62(7), 731-737.

Frailty : An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies. / Bergman, Howard; Ferrucci, Luigi; Guralnik, Jack; Hogan, David B.; Hummel, Silvia; Karunananthan, Sathya; Wolfson, Christina.

In: Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol. 62, No. 7, 07.2007, p. 731-737.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bergman, H, Ferrucci, L, Guralnik, J, Hogan, DB, Hummel, S, Karunananthan, S & Wolfson, C 2007, 'Frailty: An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies', Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 731-737.
Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J, Hogan DB, Hummel S, Karunananthan S et al. Frailty: An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2007 Jul;62(7):731-737.
Bergman, Howard ; Ferrucci, Luigi ; Guralnik, Jack ; Hogan, David B. ; Hummel, Silvia ; Karunananthan, Sathya ; Wolfson, Christina. / Frailty : An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies. In: Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2007 ; Vol. 62, No. 7. pp. 731-737.
@article{e68afd7ab65348e2b1f2765d60f5ff50,
title = "Frailty: An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies",
abstract = "Clinicians and researchers have shown increasing interest in frailty. Yet, there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the concept and its definition. In this article, we present perspectives on key issues and controversies discussed by scientists from 13 different countries, representing a diverse range of disciplines, at the 2006 Second International Working Meeting on Frailty and Aging. The following fundamental questions are discussed: What is the distinction, if any, between frailty and aging? What is its relationship with chronic disease? Is frailty a syndrome or a series of age-related impairments that predict adverse outcomes? What are the critical domains in its operational definition? Is frailty a useful concept? The implications of different models and approaches are examined. Although consensus has yet to be attained, work accomplished to date has opened exciting new horizons. The article concludes with suggested directions for future research.",
author = "Howard Bergman and Luigi Ferrucci and Jack Guralnik and Hogan, {David B.} and Silvia Hummel and Sathya Karunananthan and Christina Wolfson",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "731--737",
journal = "Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences",
issn = "1079-5006",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frailty

T2 - An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies

AU - Bergman, Howard

AU - Ferrucci, Luigi

AU - Guralnik, Jack

AU - Hogan, David B.

AU - Hummel, Silvia

AU - Karunananthan, Sathya

AU - Wolfson, Christina

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Clinicians and researchers have shown increasing interest in frailty. Yet, there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the concept and its definition. In this article, we present perspectives on key issues and controversies discussed by scientists from 13 different countries, representing a diverse range of disciplines, at the 2006 Second International Working Meeting on Frailty and Aging. The following fundamental questions are discussed: What is the distinction, if any, between frailty and aging? What is its relationship with chronic disease? Is frailty a syndrome or a series of age-related impairments that predict adverse outcomes? What are the critical domains in its operational definition? Is frailty a useful concept? The implications of different models and approaches are examined. Although consensus has yet to be attained, work accomplished to date has opened exciting new horizons. The article concludes with suggested directions for future research.

AB - Clinicians and researchers have shown increasing interest in frailty. Yet, there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the concept and its definition. In this article, we present perspectives on key issues and controversies discussed by scientists from 13 different countries, representing a diverse range of disciplines, at the 2006 Second International Working Meeting on Frailty and Aging. The following fundamental questions are discussed: What is the distinction, if any, between frailty and aging? What is its relationship with chronic disease? Is frailty a syndrome or a series of age-related impairments that predict adverse outcomes? What are the critical domains in its operational definition? Is frailty a useful concept? The implications of different models and approaches are examined. Although consensus has yet to be attained, work accomplished to date has opened exciting new horizons. The article concludes with suggested directions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548393607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548393607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17634320

AN - SCOPUS:34548393607

VL - 62

SP - 731

EP - 737

JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

SN - 1079-5006

IS - 7

ER -