Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters).

Godfrey Kigozi, Maria J Wawer, Absalom Ssettuba, Joseph Kagaayi, Fred Nalugoda, Stephen Watya, Fred Wabwire Mangen, Noah Kiwanuka, Melanie C. Bacon, Tom Lutalo, David Serwadda, Ronald H Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Male circumcision reduces HIV acquisition in men. We assessed whether foreskin surface area was associated with HIV acquisition prior to circumcision. In two randomized trials of male circumcision, the surface area of the foreskin was measured after surgery using standardized procedures. Nine hundred and sixty-five initially HIV-negative men were enrolled in a community cohort who subsequently enrolled in the male circumcision trials, provided 3920.8 person-years of observation prior to circumcision. We estimated HIV incidence per 100 person-years prior to circumcision, associated with foreskin surface area categorized into quartiles. Mean foreskin surface area was significantly higher among men who acquired HIV (43.3 cm2, standard error 2.1) compared with men who remained uninfected (36.8 cm, standard error 0.5, P = 0.01). HIV incidence was 0.80/100 person-years (8/994.9 person-years) for men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile (<or =26.3 cm2), 0.92/100 person-years (9/975.3 person-years) with foreskin areas in the second quartile (26.4-35.0 cm2), 0.90/100 person-years (8/888.5 person-years) with foreskin area in the third quartile (35.2-45.5 cm2) and 2.48/100 person-years (23/926.8 person-years) in men with foreskin surfaces areas in the highest quartile (>45.6 cm2). Compared with men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile, the adjusted incidence rate ratio of HIV acquisition was 2.37 (95% confidence interval 1.05-5.31) in men with the largest quartile of foreskin surface area. The risk of male HIV acquisition is increased among men with larger foreskin surface areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2209-2213
Number of pages5
JournalAIDS
Volume23
Issue number16
StatePublished - Oct 23 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foreskin
Uganda
HIV
Male Circumcision
Incidence
Observation
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kigozi, G., Wawer, M. J., Ssettuba, A., Kagaayi, J., Nalugoda, F., Watya, S., ... Gray, R. H. (2009). Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters). AIDS, 23(16), 2209-2213.

Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters). / Kigozi, Godfrey; Wawer, Maria J; Ssettuba, Absalom; Kagaayi, Joseph; Nalugoda, Fred; Watya, Stephen; Mangen, Fred Wabwire; Kiwanuka, Noah; Bacon, Melanie C.; Lutalo, Tom; Serwadda, David; Gray, Ronald H.

In: AIDS, Vol. 23, No. 16, 23.10.2009, p. 2209-2213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kigozi, G, Wawer, MJ, Ssettuba, A, Kagaayi, J, Nalugoda, F, Watya, S, Mangen, FW, Kiwanuka, N, Bacon, MC, Lutalo, T, Serwadda, D & Gray, RH 2009, 'Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters).', AIDS, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 2209-2213.
Kigozi G, Wawer MJ, Ssettuba A, Kagaayi J, Nalugoda F, Watya S et al. Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters). AIDS. 2009 Oct 23;23(16):2209-2213.
Kigozi, Godfrey ; Wawer, Maria J ; Ssettuba, Absalom ; Kagaayi, Joseph ; Nalugoda, Fred ; Watya, Stephen ; Mangen, Fred Wabwire ; Kiwanuka, Noah ; Bacon, Melanie C. ; Lutalo, Tom ; Serwadda, David ; Gray, Ronald H. / Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters). In: AIDS. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 16. pp. 2209-2213.
@article{36595b78099b49d681050b87a10e9805,
title = "Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters).",
abstract = "Male circumcision reduces HIV acquisition in men. We assessed whether foreskin surface area was associated with HIV acquisition prior to circumcision. In two randomized trials of male circumcision, the surface area of the foreskin was measured after surgery using standardized procedures. Nine hundred and sixty-five initially HIV-negative men were enrolled in a community cohort who subsequently enrolled in the male circumcision trials, provided 3920.8 person-years of observation prior to circumcision. We estimated HIV incidence per 100 person-years prior to circumcision, associated with foreskin surface area categorized into quartiles. Mean foreskin surface area was significantly higher among men who acquired HIV (43.3 cm2, standard error 2.1) compared with men who remained uninfected (36.8 cm, standard error 0.5, P = 0.01). HIV incidence was 0.80/100 person-years (8/994.9 person-years) for men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile (45.6 cm2). Compared with men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile, the adjusted incidence rate ratio of HIV acquisition was 2.37 (95{\%} confidence interval 1.05-5.31) in men with the largest quartile of foreskin surface area. The risk of male HIV acquisition is increased among men with larger foreskin surface areas.",
author = "Godfrey Kigozi and Wawer, {Maria J} and Absalom Ssettuba and Joseph Kagaayi and Fred Nalugoda and Stephen Watya and Mangen, {Fred Wabwire} and Noah Kiwanuka and Bacon, {Melanie C.} and Tom Lutalo and David Serwadda and Gray, {Ronald H}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "2209--2213",
journal = "AIDS",
issn = "0269-9370",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foreskin surface area and HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (size matters).

AU - Kigozi, Godfrey

AU - Wawer, Maria J

AU - Ssettuba, Absalom

AU - Kagaayi, Joseph

AU - Nalugoda, Fred

AU - Watya, Stephen

AU - Mangen, Fred Wabwire

AU - Kiwanuka, Noah

AU - Bacon, Melanie C.

AU - Lutalo, Tom

AU - Serwadda, David

AU - Gray, Ronald H

PY - 2009/10/23

Y1 - 2009/10/23

N2 - Male circumcision reduces HIV acquisition in men. We assessed whether foreskin surface area was associated with HIV acquisition prior to circumcision. In two randomized trials of male circumcision, the surface area of the foreskin was measured after surgery using standardized procedures. Nine hundred and sixty-five initially HIV-negative men were enrolled in a community cohort who subsequently enrolled in the male circumcision trials, provided 3920.8 person-years of observation prior to circumcision. We estimated HIV incidence per 100 person-years prior to circumcision, associated with foreskin surface area categorized into quartiles. Mean foreskin surface area was significantly higher among men who acquired HIV (43.3 cm2, standard error 2.1) compared with men who remained uninfected (36.8 cm, standard error 0.5, P = 0.01). HIV incidence was 0.80/100 person-years (8/994.9 person-years) for men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile (45.6 cm2). Compared with men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile, the adjusted incidence rate ratio of HIV acquisition was 2.37 (95% confidence interval 1.05-5.31) in men with the largest quartile of foreskin surface area. The risk of male HIV acquisition is increased among men with larger foreskin surface areas.

AB - Male circumcision reduces HIV acquisition in men. We assessed whether foreskin surface area was associated with HIV acquisition prior to circumcision. In two randomized trials of male circumcision, the surface area of the foreskin was measured after surgery using standardized procedures. Nine hundred and sixty-five initially HIV-negative men were enrolled in a community cohort who subsequently enrolled in the male circumcision trials, provided 3920.8 person-years of observation prior to circumcision. We estimated HIV incidence per 100 person-years prior to circumcision, associated with foreskin surface area categorized into quartiles. Mean foreskin surface area was significantly higher among men who acquired HIV (43.3 cm2, standard error 2.1) compared with men who remained uninfected (36.8 cm, standard error 0.5, P = 0.01). HIV incidence was 0.80/100 person-years (8/994.9 person-years) for men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile (45.6 cm2). Compared with men with foreskin surface areas in the lowest quartile, the adjusted incidence rate ratio of HIV acquisition was 2.37 (95% confidence interval 1.05-5.31) in men with the largest quartile of foreskin surface area. The risk of male HIV acquisition is increased among men with larger foreskin surface areas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949420120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949420120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19770623

AN - SCOPUS:77949420120

VL - 23

SP - 2209

EP - 2213

JO - AIDS

JF - AIDS

SN - 0269-9370

IS - 16

ER -