Food for thought⋯cellular resilience

Lena Smirnova, Georgina Harris, Marcel Leist, Thomas Hartung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cellular resilience describes the ability of a cell to cope with environmental changes such as toxicant exposure. If cellular metabolism does not collapse directly after the hit or end in programmed cell death, the ensuing stress responses promote a new homeostasis under stress. The processes of reverting "back to normal" and reversal of apoptosis ("anastasis") have been studied little at the cellular level. Cell types show astonishingly similar vulnerability to most toxicants, except for those that require a very specific target, metabolism or mechanism present only in specific cell types. The majority of chemicals triggers "general cytotoxicity" in any cell at similar concentrations. We hypothesize that cells differ less in their vulnerability to a given toxicant than in their resilience (coping with the "hit"). In many cases, cells do not return to the naïve state after a toxic insult. The phenomena of "pre-conditioning", "tolerance" and "hormesis" describe this for low-dose exposures to toxicants that render the cell more resistant to subsequent hits. The defense and resilience programs include epigenetic changes that leave a "memory/scar" - an alteration as a consequence of the stress the cell has experienced. These memories might have long-term consequences, both positive (resistance) and negative, that contribute to chronic and delayed manifestations of hazard and, ultimately, disease. This article calls for more systematic analyses of how cells cope with toxic perturbations in the long-term after stressor withdrawal. A technical prerequisite for these are stable (organotypic) cultures and a characterization of stress response molecular networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-260
Number of pages14
JournalAltex
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Food
Poisons
Hormesis
Aptitude
Epigenomics
Cicatrix
Homeostasis
Cell Death
Apoptosis

Keywords

  • Cell death
  • Cellular defense
  • Cellular toxicology
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Stress pathways

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medical Laboratory Technology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Food for thought⋯cellular resilience. / Smirnova, Lena; Harris, Georgina; Leist, Marcel; Hartung, Thomas.

In: Altex, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2015, p. 247-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smirnova, Lena ; Harris, Georgina ; Leist, Marcel ; Hartung, Thomas. / Food for thought⋯cellular resilience. In: Altex. 2015 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 247-260.
@article{9a985c2615104363b103fd4b69e970d7,
title = "Food for thought⋯cellular resilience",
abstract = "Cellular resilience describes the ability of a cell to cope with environmental changes such as toxicant exposure. If cellular metabolism does not collapse directly after the hit or end in programmed cell death, the ensuing stress responses promote a new homeostasis under stress. The processes of reverting {"}back to normal{"} and reversal of apoptosis ({"}anastasis{"}) have been studied little at the cellular level. Cell types show astonishingly similar vulnerability to most toxicants, except for those that require a very specific target, metabolism or mechanism present only in specific cell types. The majority of chemicals triggers {"}general cytotoxicity{"} in any cell at similar concentrations. We hypothesize that cells differ less in their vulnerability to a given toxicant than in their resilience (coping with the {"}hit{"}). In many cases, cells do not return to the na{\"i}ve state after a toxic insult. The phenomena of {"}pre-conditioning{"}, {"}tolerance{"} and {"}hormesis{"} describe this for low-dose exposures to toxicants that render the cell more resistant to subsequent hits. The defense and resilience programs include epigenetic changes that leave a {"}memory/scar{"} - an alteration as a consequence of the stress the cell has experienced. These memories might have long-term consequences, both positive (resistance) and negative, that contribute to chronic and delayed manifestations of hazard and, ultimately, disease. This article calls for more systematic analyses of how cells cope with toxic perturbations in the long-term after stressor withdrawal. A technical prerequisite for these are stable (organotypic) cultures and a characterization of stress response molecular networks.",
keywords = "Cell death, Cellular defense, Cellular toxicology, Cytotoxicity, Stress pathways",
author = "Lena Smirnova and Georgina Harris and Marcel Leist and Thomas Hartung",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.14573/altex.1509271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "247--260",
journal = "ALTEX : Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten",
issn = "1868-596X",
publisher = "Elsevier GmbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food for thought⋯cellular resilience

AU - Smirnova, Lena

AU - Harris, Georgina

AU - Leist, Marcel

AU - Hartung, Thomas

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Cellular resilience describes the ability of a cell to cope with environmental changes such as toxicant exposure. If cellular metabolism does not collapse directly after the hit or end in programmed cell death, the ensuing stress responses promote a new homeostasis under stress. The processes of reverting "back to normal" and reversal of apoptosis ("anastasis") have been studied little at the cellular level. Cell types show astonishingly similar vulnerability to most toxicants, except for those that require a very specific target, metabolism or mechanism present only in specific cell types. The majority of chemicals triggers "general cytotoxicity" in any cell at similar concentrations. We hypothesize that cells differ less in their vulnerability to a given toxicant than in their resilience (coping with the "hit"). In many cases, cells do not return to the naïve state after a toxic insult. The phenomena of "pre-conditioning", "tolerance" and "hormesis" describe this for low-dose exposures to toxicants that render the cell more resistant to subsequent hits. The defense and resilience programs include epigenetic changes that leave a "memory/scar" - an alteration as a consequence of the stress the cell has experienced. These memories might have long-term consequences, both positive (resistance) and negative, that contribute to chronic and delayed manifestations of hazard and, ultimately, disease. This article calls for more systematic analyses of how cells cope with toxic perturbations in the long-term after stressor withdrawal. A technical prerequisite for these are stable (organotypic) cultures and a characterization of stress response molecular networks.

AB - Cellular resilience describes the ability of a cell to cope with environmental changes such as toxicant exposure. If cellular metabolism does not collapse directly after the hit or end in programmed cell death, the ensuing stress responses promote a new homeostasis under stress. The processes of reverting "back to normal" and reversal of apoptosis ("anastasis") have been studied little at the cellular level. Cell types show astonishingly similar vulnerability to most toxicants, except for those that require a very specific target, metabolism or mechanism present only in specific cell types. The majority of chemicals triggers "general cytotoxicity" in any cell at similar concentrations. We hypothesize that cells differ less in their vulnerability to a given toxicant than in their resilience (coping with the "hit"). In many cases, cells do not return to the naïve state after a toxic insult. The phenomena of "pre-conditioning", "tolerance" and "hormesis" describe this for low-dose exposures to toxicants that render the cell more resistant to subsequent hits. The defense and resilience programs include epigenetic changes that leave a "memory/scar" - an alteration as a consequence of the stress the cell has experienced. These memories might have long-term consequences, both positive (resistance) and negative, that contribute to chronic and delayed manifestations of hazard and, ultimately, disease. This article calls for more systematic analyses of how cells cope with toxic perturbations in the long-term after stressor withdrawal. A technical prerequisite for these are stable (organotypic) cultures and a characterization of stress response molecular networks.

KW - Cell death

KW - Cellular defense

KW - Cellular toxicology

KW - Cytotoxicity

KW - Stress pathways

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946742600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946742600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14573/altex.1509271

DO - 10.14573/altex.1509271

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 247

EP - 260

JO - ALTEX : Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten

JF - ALTEX : Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten

SN - 1868-596X

IS - 4

ER -