Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty: A safe alternative to traditional abdominoplasty for the massive weight loss patient

Tali Friedman, Devin O'Brien-Coon, Joseph Michaels, Chad Purnell, Seung Hur, Diamond N. Harris, J. Peter Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Traditional abdominoplasty techniques often fail to adequately correct the complex contour deformities in the massive weight loss patient. To address these deformities, addition of a vertical skin resection to the traditional horizontal excision has become a popular procedure. The authors analyzed the impact of vertical (fleur-de-lis) excision on complications when compared with traditional transverse excision. Methods: A review of massive weight loss patients enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective registry was performed on consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent at least 50 pounds of weight loss. Demographic information, procedural data, and outcome measures were studied. Logistic regression and t tests were performed to analyze differences in complication rates for both procedures and identify risk factors for complications. Results: Four hundred ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 154 (31 percent) had a fleur-de-lis vertical component. The overall abdominal complication rate for all patients was 26.3 percent, with a 5.0 percent rate of major complications. Transverse-only and fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty had similar rates of complications with the exception of a higher rate of wound infection in the fleur-de-lis group on multivariate analysis. Risk factors for abdominal wound complications with either procedure included male sex, high body mass index, concurrent component separation, and previous subcostal scars. Conclusions: Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty can be safely performed with complication rates comparable to those of traditional abdominoplasty techniques. Ideal candidates are patients with upper abdominal skin laxity who may not achieve an adequate aesthetic result with transverse-only excision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1525-1535
Number of pages11
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume125
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abdominoplasty
Weight Loss
Skin
Research Ethics Committees
Wound Infection
Esthetics
Cicatrix
Registries
Body Mass Index
Multivariate Analysis
Logistic Models
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty : A safe alternative to traditional abdominoplasty for the massive weight loss patient. / Friedman, Tali; O'Brien-Coon, Devin; Michaels, Joseph; Purnell, Chad; Hur, Seung; Harris, Diamond N.; Rubin, J. Peter.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 125, No. 5, 01.05.2010, p. 1525-1535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Friedman, Tali ; O'Brien-Coon, Devin ; Michaels, Joseph ; Purnell, Chad ; Hur, Seung ; Harris, Diamond N. ; Rubin, J. Peter. / Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty : A safe alternative to traditional abdominoplasty for the massive weight loss patient. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 125, No. 5. pp. 1525-1535.
@article{cf48c9f3f15e47e489785bf487f4fc8c,
title = "Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty: A safe alternative to traditional abdominoplasty for the massive weight loss patient",
abstract = "Background: Traditional abdominoplasty techniques often fail to adequately correct the complex contour deformities in the massive weight loss patient. To address these deformities, addition of a vertical skin resection to the traditional horizontal excision has become a popular procedure. The authors analyzed the impact of vertical (fleur-de-lis) excision on complications when compared with traditional transverse excision. Methods: A review of massive weight loss patients enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective registry was performed on consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent at least 50 pounds of weight loss. Demographic information, procedural data, and outcome measures were studied. Logistic regression and t tests were performed to analyze differences in complication rates for both procedures and identify risk factors for complications. Results: Four hundred ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 154 (31 percent) had a fleur-de-lis vertical component. The overall abdominal complication rate for all patients was 26.3 percent, with a 5.0 percent rate of major complications. Transverse-only and fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty had similar rates of complications with the exception of a higher rate of wound infection in the fleur-de-lis group on multivariate analysis. Risk factors for abdominal wound complications with either procedure included male sex, high body mass index, concurrent component separation, and previous subcostal scars. Conclusions: Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty can be safely performed with complication rates comparable to those of traditional abdominoplasty techniques. Ideal candidates are patients with upper abdominal skin laxity who may not achieve an adequate aesthetic result with transverse-only excision.",
author = "Tali Friedman and Devin O'Brien-Coon and Joseph Michaels and Chad Purnell and Seung Hur and Harris, {Diamond N.} and Rubin, {J. Peter}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d6e7e0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "1525--1535",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty

T2 - A safe alternative to traditional abdominoplasty for the massive weight loss patient

AU - Friedman, Tali

AU - O'Brien-Coon, Devin

AU - Michaels, Joseph

AU - Purnell, Chad

AU - Hur, Seung

AU - Harris, Diamond N.

AU - Rubin, J. Peter

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - Background: Traditional abdominoplasty techniques often fail to adequately correct the complex contour deformities in the massive weight loss patient. To address these deformities, addition of a vertical skin resection to the traditional horizontal excision has become a popular procedure. The authors analyzed the impact of vertical (fleur-de-lis) excision on complications when compared with traditional transverse excision. Methods: A review of massive weight loss patients enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective registry was performed on consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent at least 50 pounds of weight loss. Demographic information, procedural data, and outcome measures were studied. Logistic regression and t tests were performed to analyze differences in complication rates for both procedures and identify risk factors for complications. Results: Four hundred ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 154 (31 percent) had a fleur-de-lis vertical component. The overall abdominal complication rate for all patients was 26.3 percent, with a 5.0 percent rate of major complications. Transverse-only and fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty had similar rates of complications with the exception of a higher rate of wound infection in the fleur-de-lis group on multivariate analysis. Risk factors for abdominal wound complications with either procedure included male sex, high body mass index, concurrent component separation, and previous subcostal scars. Conclusions: Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty can be safely performed with complication rates comparable to those of traditional abdominoplasty techniques. Ideal candidates are patients with upper abdominal skin laxity who may not achieve an adequate aesthetic result with transverse-only excision.

AB - Background: Traditional abdominoplasty techniques often fail to adequately correct the complex contour deformities in the massive weight loss patient. To address these deformities, addition of a vertical skin resection to the traditional horizontal excision has become a popular procedure. The authors analyzed the impact of vertical (fleur-de-lis) excision on complications when compared with traditional transverse excision. Methods: A review of massive weight loss patients enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective registry was performed on consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent at least 50 pounds of weight loss. Demographic information, procedural data, and outcome measures were studied. Logistic regression and t tests were performed to analyze differences in complication rates for both procedures and identify risk factors for complications. Results: Four hundred ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 154 (31 percent) had a fleur-de-lis vertical component. The overall abdominal complication rate for all patients was 26.3 percent, with a 5.0 percent rate of major complications. Transverse-only and fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty had similar rates of complications with the exception of a higher rate of wound infection in the fleur-de-lis group on multivariate analysis. Risk factors for abdominal wound complications with either procedure included male sex, high body mass index, concurrent component separation, and previous subcostal scars. Conclusions: Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty can be safely performed with complication rates comparable to those of traditional abdominoplasty techniques. Ideal candidates are patients with upper abdominal skin laxity who may not achieve an adequate aesthetic result with transverse-only excision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951776292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951776292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d6e7e0

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d6e7e0

M3 - Article

C2 - 20145584

AN - SCOPUS:77951776292

VL - 125

SP - 1525

EP - 1535

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 5

ER -