We recently argued (McCloskey, Wible, & Cohen, 1988) that the available evidence fails to warrant postulation of a special flashbulb memory mechanism. Although apparently agreeing with our conclusion, Pillemer (1990) criticizes us on a number of grounds. In this reply we address Pillemer's criticisms.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||4|
|Journal||Journal of Experimental Psychology: General|
|Publication status||Published - Mar 1990|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Neuroscience