Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines

Ronald J. Prineas, Kenneth Goodman, Colin L. Soskolne, Germaine Buck, Manning Feinleib, John Last, John S. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: A survey to establish both the need and subject areas for a possible new set of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists was conducted among a random sample of 300 North American (Canada, Mexico, and United States) members of three major United States-based professional epidemiology organizations. METHODS: An 88% response rate revealed wide agreement on topics to be included in any new set of guidelines, but uncertainty prevailed about the need for new guidelines; 41% agreed that there was a need to develop a new set, 43% had no opinion, and 16% disagreed. RESULTS: There was almost no difference in preferences between men and women for topics to be included in a new set of guidelines, or between those aware or unaware of extant ethics guidelines in epidemiology. Fifty-four percent were aware of such guidelines and only 29% of these said they could describe the content of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: More needs to be done to evaluate the utility of ethics codes in epidemiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)482-489
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume8
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethics
Epidemiology
Guidelines
Codes of Ethics
Mexico
Surveys and Questionnaires
Uncertainty
Canada

Keywords

  • Applied Ethics
  • Codes of Ethics
  • Epidemiology
  • Ethics Guidelines
  • Professional Ethics
  • Professional Standards
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Prineas, R. J., Goodman, K., Soskolne, C. L., Buck, G., Feinleib, M., Last, J., & Andrews, J. S. (1998). Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines. Annals of Epidemiology, 8(8), 482-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00016-7

Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines. / Prineas, Ronald J.; Goodman, Kenneth; Soskolne, Colin L.; Buck, Germaine; Feinleib, Manning; Last, John; Andrews, John S.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 8, No. 8, 11.1998, p. 482-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prineas, RJ, Goodman, K, Soskolne, CL, Buck, G, Feinleib, M, Last, J & Andrews, JS 1998, 'Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines', Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 482-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00016-7
Prineas, Ronald J. ; Goodman, Kenneth ; Soskolne, Colin L. ; Buck, Germaine ; Feinleib, Manning ; Last, John ; Andrews, John S. / Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines. In: Annals of Epidemiology. 1998 ; Vol. 8, No. 8. pp. 482-489.
@article{db569c893d364760972a1bfeca7a5a7d,
title = "Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines",
abstract = "PURPOSE: A survey to establish both the need and subject areas for a possible new set of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists was conducted among a random sample of 300 North American (Canada, Mexico, and United States) members of three major United States-based professional epidemiology organizations. METHODS: An 88{\%} response rate revealed wide agreement on topics to be included in any new set of guidelines, but uncertainty prevailed about the need for new guidelines; 41{\%} agreed that there was a need to develop a new set, 43{\%} had no opinion, and 16{\%} disagreed. RESULTS: There was almost no difference in preferences between men and women for topics to be included in a new set of guidelines, or between those aware or unaware of extant ethics guidelines in epidemiology. Fifty-four percent were aware of such guidelines and only 29{\%} of these said they could describe the content of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: More needs to be done to evaluate the utility of ethics codes in epidemiology.",
keywords = "Applied Ethics, Codes of Ethics, Epidemiology, Ethics Guidelines, Professional Ethics, Professional Standards, Survey",
author = "Prineas, {Ronald J.} and Kenneth Goodman and Soskolne, {Colin L.} and Germaine Buck and Manning Feinleib and John Last and Andrews, {John S.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00016-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "482--489",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Findings from the american college of epidemiology's survey on ethics guidelines

AU - Prineas, Ronald J.

AU - Goodman, Kenneth

AU - Soskolne, Colin L.

AU - Buck, Germaine

AU - Feinleib, Manning

AU - Last, John

AU - Andrews, John S.

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - PURPOSE: A survey to establish both the need and subject areas for a possible new set of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists was conducted among a random sample of 300 North American (Canada, Mexico, and United States) members of three major United States-based professional epidemiology organizations. METHODS: An 88% response rate revealed wide agreement on topics to be included in any new set of guidelines, but uncertainty prevailed about the need for new guidelines; 41% agreed that there was a need to develop a new set, 43% had no opinion, and 16% disagreed. RESULTS: There was almost no difference in preferences between men and women for topics to be included in a new set of guidelines, or between those aware or unaware of extant ethics guidelines in epidemiology. Fifty-four percent were aware of such guidelines and only 29% of these said they could describe the content of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: More needs to be done to evaluate the utility of ethics codes in epidemiology.

AB - PURPOSE: A survey to establish both the need and subject areas for a possible new set of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists was conducted among a random sample of 300 North American (Canada, Mexico, and United States) members of three major United States-based professional epidemiology organizations. METHODS: An 88% response rate revealed wide agreement on topics to be included in any new set of guidelines, but uncertainty prevailed about the need for new guidelines; 41% agreed that there was a need to develop a new set, 43% had no opinion, and 16% disagreed. RESULTS: There was almost no difference in preferences between men and women for topics to be included in a new set of guidelines, or between those aware or unaware of extant ethics guidelines in epidemiology. Fifty-four percent were aware of such guidelines and only 29% of these said they could describe the content of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: More needs to be done to evaluate the utility of ethics codes in epidemiology.

KW - Applied Ethics

KW - Codes of Ethics

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Ethics Guidelines

KW - Professional Ethics

KW - Professional Standards

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031713162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031713162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00016-7

DO - 10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00016-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 9802592

AN - SCOPUS:0031713162

VL - 8

SP - 482

EP - 489

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 8

ER -