Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor

Misti Levy Zamora, Fulizi Xiong, Drew Gentner, Branko Kerkez, Joseph Kohrman-Glaser, Kirsten A Koehler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Due to the rapid development of low-cost air-quality sensors, a rigorous scientific evaluation has not been conducted for many available sensors. We evaluated three Plantower PMS A003 sensors when exposed to eight particulate matter (PM) sources (i.e., incense, oleic acid, NaCl, talcum powder, cooking emissions, and monodispersed polystyrene latex spheres under controlled laboratory conditions and also residential air and ambient outdoor air in Baltimore, MD). The PM2.5 sensors exhibited a high degree of precision and R2 values greater than 0.86 for all sources, but the accuracy ranged from 13 to >90% compared with reference instruments. The sensors were most accurate for PM with diameters below 1 μm, and they poorly measured PM in the 2.5-5 μm range. The accuracy of the sensors was dependent on relative humidity (RH), with decreases in accuracy at RH > 50%. The sensors were able to produce meaningful data at low and high temperatures and when in motion, as it would be if utilized for outdoor or personal monitoring applications. It was most accurate in environments with polydispersed particle sources and may not be useful in specialized environments or experiments with narrow distributions of PM or aerosols with a large proportion of coarse PM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)838-849
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2019

Fingerprint

Particulate Matter
particulate matter
sensor
Sensors
cost
Costs
relative humidity
Atmospheric humidity
Talc
Cooking
air
Oleic Acid
Air
evaluation
laboratory
Aerosols
Air quality
air quality
aerosol
Monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor. / Levy Zamora, Misti; Xiong, Fulizi; Gentner, Drew; Kerkez, Branko; Kohrman-Glaser, Joseph; Koehler, Kirsten A.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 53, No. 2, 15.01.2019, p. 838-849.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levy Zamora, Misti ; Xiong, Fulizi ; Gentner, Drew ; Kerkez, Branko ; Kohrman-Glaser, Joseph ; Koehler, Kirsten A. / Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 838-849.
@article{161682202a6244b09cdc355a37e0e5b1,
title = "Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor",
abstract = "Due to the rapid development of low-cost air-quality sensors, a rigorous scientific evaluation has not been conducted for many available sensors. We evaluated three Plantower PMS A003 sensors when exposed to eight particulate matter (PM) sources (i.e., incense, oleic acid, NaCl, talcum powder, cooking emissions, and monodispersed polystyrene latex spheres under controlled laboratory conditions and also residential air and ambient outdoor air in Baltimore, MD). The PM2.5 sensors exhibited a high degree of precision and R2 values greater than 0.86 for all sources, but the accuracy ranged from 13 to >90{\%} compared with reference instruments. The sensors were most accurate for PM with diameters below 1 μm, and they poorly measured PM in the 2.5-5 μm range. The accuracy of the sensors was dependent on relative humidity (RH), with decreases in accuracy at RH > 50{\%}. The sensors were able to produce meaningful data at low and high temperatures and when in motion, as it would be if utilized for outdoor or personal monitoring applications. It was most accurate in environments with polydispersed particle sources and may not be useful in specialized environments or experiments with narrow distributions of PM or aerosols with a large proportion of coarse PM.",
author = "{Levy Zamora}, Misti and Fulizi Xiong and Drew Gentner and Branko Kerkez and Joseph Kohrman-Glaser and Koehler, {Kirsten A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.8b05174",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "838--849",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor

AU - Levy Zamora, Misti

AU - Xiong, Fulizi

AU - Gentner, Drew

AU - Kerkez, Branko

AU - Kohrman-Glaser, Joseph

AU - Koehler, Kirsten A

PY - 2019/1/15

Y1 - 2019/1/15

N2 - Due to the rapid development of low-cost air-quality sensors, a rigorous scientific evaluation has not been conducted for many available sensors. We evaluated three Plantower PMS A003 sensors when exposed to eight particulate matter (PM) sources (i.e., incense, oleic acid, NaCl, talcum powder, cooking emissions, and monodispersed polystyrene latex spheres under controlled laboratory conditions and also residential air and ambient outdoor air in Baltimore, MD). The PM2.5 sensors exhibited a high degree of precision and R2 values greater than 0.86 for all sources, but the accuracy ranged from 13 to >90% compared with reference instruments. The sensors were most accurate for PM with diameters below 1 μm, and they poorly measured PM in the 2.5-5 μm range. The accuracy of the sensors was dependent on relative humidity (RH), with decreases in accuracy at RH > 50%. The sensors were able to produce meaningful data at low and high temperatures and when in motion, as it would be if utilized for outdoor or personal monitoring applications. It was most accurate in environments with polydispersed particle sources and may not be useful in specialized environments or experiments with narrow distributions of PM or aerosols with a large proportion of coarse PM.

AB - Due to the rapid development of low-cost air-quality sensors, a rigorous scientific evaluation has not been conducted for many available sensors. We evaluated three Plantower PMS A003 sensors when exposed to eight particulate matter (PM) sources (i.e., incense, oleic acid, NaCl, talcum powder, cooking emissions, and monodispersed polystyrene latex spheres under controlled laboratory conditions and also residential air and ambient outdoor air in Baltimore, MD). The PM2.5 sensors exhibited a high degree of precision and R2 values greater than 0.86 for all sources, but the accuracy ranged from 13 to >90% compared with reference instruments. The sensors were most accurate for PM with diameters below 1 μm, and they poorly measured PM in the 2.5-5 μm range. The accuracy of the sensors was dependent on relative humidity (RH), with decreases in accuracy at RH > 50%. The sensors were able to produce meaningful data at low and high temperatures and when in motion, as it would be if utilized for outdoor or personal monitoring applications. It was most accurate in environments with polydispersed particle sources and may not be useful in specialized environments or experiments with narrow distributions of PM or aerosols with a large proportion of coarse PM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060081858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060081858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 838

EP - 849

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 2

ER -