Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence

Gary E. Leach, Roger R. Dmochowski, Rodney A. Appell, Jerry G. Blaivas, H. Roger Hadley, Karl M. Luber, Jacek Mostwin, Pat D. O'Donnell, Claus G. Roehrborn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding surgical procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence in the otherwise healthy female subject and to make practice recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. Materials and Methods: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles through 1993 on surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Outcomes data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The data were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternative surgical procedures. Results: The data indicate that after 48 months retropubic suspensions and slings appear to be more efficacious than transvaginal suspensions, and also more efficacious than anterior repairs. The literature suggests higher complication rates when synthetic materials are used for slings. Conclusions: The panel found sufficient acceptable long-term outcomes data (longer than 48 months) to conclude that surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence is effective, offering a long-term cure in a significant percentage of women. The evidence supports surgery as initial therapy and as a secondary form of therapy after failure of other treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Retropubic suspensions and slings are the most efficacious procedures for long-term success (based on cure/dry rates). However, in the panel's opinion retropubic suspensions and sling procedures are associated with slightly higher complication rates, including longer convalescence and postoperative voiding dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)875-880
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume158
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Guidelines
Suspensions
Therapeutics
Treatment Failure
MEDLINE
Healthy Volunteers
Databases

Keywords

  • Stress
  • Urinary incontinence
  • Urinary incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Leach, G. E., Dmochowski, R. R., Appell, R. A., Blaivas, J. G., Hadley, H. R., Luber, K. M., ... Roehrborn, C. G. (1997). Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. Journal of Urology, 158(3), 875-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64346-5

Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. / Leach, Gary E.; Dmochowski, Roger R.; Appell, Rodney A.; Blaivas, Jerry G.; Hadley, H. Roger; Luber, Karl M.; Mostwin, Jacek; O'Donnell, Pat D.; Roehrborn, Claus G.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 158, No. 3, 09.1997, p. 875-880.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leach, GE, Dmochowski, RR, Appell, RA, Blaivas, JG, Hadley, HR, Luber, KM, Mostwin, J, O'Donnell, PD & Roehrborn, CG 1997, 'Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence', Journal of Urology, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 875-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64346-5
Leach, Gary E. ; Dmochowski, Roger R. ; Appell, Rodney A. ; Blaivas, Jerry G. ; Hadley, H. Roger ; Luber, Karl M. ; Mostwin, Jacek ; O'Donnell, Pat D. ; Roehrborn, Claus G. / Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. In: Journal of Urology. 1997 ; Vol. 158, No. 3. pp. 875-880.
@article{58b826023ac24f3980d2d5f29daefa5d,
title = "Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence",
abstract = "Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding surgical procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence in the otherwise healthy female subject and to make practice recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. Materials and Methods: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles through 1993 on surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Outcomes data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The data were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternative surgical procedures. Results: The data indicate that after 48 months retropubic suspensions and slings appear to be more efficacious than transvaginal suspensions, and also more efficacious than anterior repairs. The literature suggests higher complication rates when synthetic materials are used for slings. Conclusions: The panel found sufficient acceptable long-term outcomes data (longer than 48 months) to conclude that surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence is effective, offering a long-term cure in a significant percentage of women. The evidence supports surgery as initial therapy and as a secondary form of therapy after failure of other treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Retropubic suspensions and slings are the most efficacious procedures for long-term success (based on cure/dry rates). However, in the panel's opinion retropubic suspensions and sling procedures are associated with slightly higher complication rates, including longer convalescence and postoperative voiding dysfunction.",
keywords = "Stress, Urinary incontinence, Urinary incontinence",
author = "Leach, {Gary E.} and Dmochowski, {Roger R.} and Appell, {Rodney A.} and Blaivas, {Jerry G.} and Hadley, {H. Roger} and Luber, {Karl M.} and Jacek Mostwin and O'Donnell, {Pat D.} and Roehrborn, {Claus G.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64346-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "875--880",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence

AU - Leach, Gary E.

AU - Dmochowski, Roger R.

AU - Appell, Rodney A.

AU - Blaivas, Jerry G.

AU - Hadley, H. Roger

AU - Luber, Karl M.

AU - Mostwin, Jacek

AU - O'Donnell, Pat D.

AU - Roehrborn, Claus G.

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding surgical procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence in the otherwise healthy female subject and to make practice recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. Materials and Methods: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles through 1993 on surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Outcomes data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The data were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternative surgical procedures. Results: The data indicate that after 48 months retropubic suspensions and slings appear to be more efficacious than transvaginal suspensions, and also more efficacious than anterior repairs. The literature suggests higher complication rates when synthetic materials are used for slings. Conclusions: The panel found sufficient acceptable long-term outcomes data (longer than 48 months) to conclude that surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence is effective, offering a long-term cure in a significant percentage of women. The evidence supports surgery as initial therapy and as a secondary form of therapy after failure of other treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Retropubic suspensions and slings are the most efficacious procedures for long-term success (based on cure/dry rates). However, in the panel's opinion retropubic suspensions and sling procedures are associated with slightly higher complication rates, including longer convalescence and postoperative voiding dysfunction.

AB - Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding surgical procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence in the otherwise healthy female subject and to make practice recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. Materials and Methods: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles through 1993 on surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Outcomes data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The data were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternative surgical procedures. Results: The data indicate that after 48 months retropubic suspensions and slings appear to be more efficacious than transvaginal suspensions, and also more efficacious than anterior repairs. The literature suggests higher complication rates when synthetic materials are used for slings. Conclusions: The panel found sufficient acceptable long-term outcomes data (longer than 48 months) to conclude that surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence is effective, offering a long-term cure in a significant percentage of women. The evidence supports surgery as initial therapy and as a secondary form of therapy after failure of other treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Retropubic suspensions and slings are the most efficacious procedures for long-term success (based on cure/dry rates). However, in the panel's opinion retropubic suspensions and sling procedures are associated with slightly higher complication rates, including longer convalescence and postoperative voiding dysfunction.

KW - Stress

KW - Urinary incontinence

KW - Urinary incontinence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030795459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030795459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64346-5

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64346-5

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 875

EP - 880

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -