Feasibility of a nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol in the surgical intensive care unit

Alan Rozycki, Andrew S. Jarrell, Rachel M. Kruer, Samantha Young, Pedro A Mendez Tellez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines recommend the use of pain, agitation, and delirium protocols in the intensive care unit. The feasibility of nurse management of such protocols in the surgical intensive care unit has not been well assessed. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the percentage of adherent medication interventions for patients assessed by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol. METHODS Data on all adult patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit from January 2013 through September 2013 who were assessed at least once by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol adherence was evaluated for interventions implemented after a nursing assessment. Patients were further divided into 2 groups on the basis of adherence, and achievement of pain and sedation goals was evaluated between groups. RESULTS Data on 41 patients were included. Of the 603 pain assessments, 422 (70.0%) led to an intervention adherent to the protocol. Of the 249 sedation assessments, 192 (77.1%) led to an adherent intervention. Among patients with 75% or greater adherent pain interventions, all interventions met pain goals with significantly less fentanyl than that used in interventions that did not meet goals. Despite 75% or greater adherence with interventions for sedation assessments, only 8.7% of the interventions met sedation goals. CONCLUSIONs A nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol can be feasibly implemented in a surgical intensive care unit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-35
Number of pages12
JournalCritical Care Nurse
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Delirium
Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Nurses
Pain
Nursing Assessment
Fentanyl
Pain Measurement
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care

Cite this

Feasibility of a nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol in the surgical intensive care unit. / Rozycki, Alan; Jarrell, Andrew S.; Kruer, Rachel M.; Young, Samantha; Mendez Tellez, Pedro A.

In: Critical Care Nurse, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.01.2017, p. 24-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rozycki, Alan ; Jarrell, Andrew S. ; Kruer, Rachel M. ; Young, Samantha ; Mendez Tellez, Pedro A. / Feasibility of a nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol in the surgical intensive care unit. In: Critical Care Nurse. 2017 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 24-35.
@article{ec20ae1de1d540d5a9ab9b6be38a7742,
title = "Feasibility of a nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol in the surgical intensive care unit",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines recommend the use of pain, agitation, and delirium protocols in the intensive care unit. The feasibility of nurse management of such protocols in the surgical intensive care unit has not been well assessed. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the percentage of adherent medication interventions for patients assessed by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol. METHODS Data on all adult patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit from January 2013 through September 2013 who were assessed at least once by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol adherence was evaluated for interventions implemented after a nursing assessment. Patients were further divided into 2 groups on the basis of adherence, and achievement of pain and sedation goals was evaluated between groups. RESULTS Data on 41 patients were included. Of the 603 pain assessments, 422 (70.0{\%}) led to an intervention adherent to the protocol. Of the 249 sedation assessments, 192 (77.1{\%}) led to an adherent intervention. Among patients with 75{\%} or greater adherent pain interventions, all interventions met pain goals with significantly less fentanyl than that used in interventions that did not meet goals. Despite 75{\%} or greater adherence with interventions for sedation assessments, only 8.7{\%} of the interventions met sedation goals. CONCLUSIONs A nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol can be feasibly implemented in a surgical intensive care unit.",
author = "Alan Rozycki and Jarrell, {Andrew S.} and Kruer, {Rachel M.} and Samantha Young and {Mendez Tellez}, {Pedro A}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4037/ccn2017528",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "24--35",
journal = "Critical Care Nurse",
issn = "0279-5442",
publisher = "American Association of Critical Care Nurses",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of a nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol in the surgical intensive care unit

AU - Rozycki, Alan

AU - Jarrell, Andrew S.

AU - Kruer, Rachel M.

AU - Young, Samantha

AU - Mendez Tellez, Pedro A

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines recommend the use of pain, agitation, and delirium protocols in the intensive care unit. The feasibility of nurse management of such protocols in the surgical intensive care unit has not been well assessed. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the percentage of adherent medication interventions for patients assessed by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol. METHODS Data on all adult patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit from January 2013 through September 2013 who were assessed at least once by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol adherence was evaluated for interventions implemented after a nursing assessment. Patients were further divided into 2 groups on the basis of adherence, and achievement of pain and sedation goals was evaluated between groups. RESULTS Data on 41 patients were included. Of the 603 pain assessments, 422 (70.0%) led to an intervention adherent to the protocol. Of the 249 sedation assessments, 192 (77.1%) led to an adherent intervention. Among patients with 75% or greater adherent pain interventions, all interventions met pain goals with significantly less fentanyl than that used in interventions that did not meet goals. Despite 75% or greater adherence with interventions for sedation assessments, only 8.7% of the interventions met sedation goals. CONCLUSIONs A nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol can be feasibly implemented in a surgical intensive care unit.

AB - BACKGROUND Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines recommend the use of pain, agitation, and delirium protocols in the intensive care unit. The feasibility of nurse management of such protocols in the surgical intensive care unit has not been well assessed. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the percentage of adherent medication interventions for patients assessed by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol. METHODS Data on all adult patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit from January 2013 through September 2013 who were assessed at least once by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol adherence was evaluated for interventions implemented after a nursing assessment. Patients were further divided into 2 groups on the basis of adherence, and achievement of pain and sedation goals was evaluated between groups. RESULTS Data on 41 patients were included. Of the 603 pain assessments, 422 (70.0%) led to an intervention adherent to the protocol. Of the 249 sedation assessments, 192 (77.1%) led to an adherent intervention. Among patients with 75% or greater adherent pain interventions, all interventions met pain goals with significantly less fentanyl than that used in interventions that did not meet goals. Despite 75% or greater adherence with interventions for sedation assessments, only 8.7% of the interventions met sedation goals. CONCLUSIONs A nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol can be feasibly implemented in a surgical intensive care unit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036563368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036563368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4037/ccn2017528

DO - 10.4037/ccn2017528

M3 - Article

C2 - 29196585

AN - SCOPUS:85036563368

VL - 37

SP - 24

EP - 35

JO - Critical Care Nurse

JF - Critical Care Nurse

SN - 0279-5442

IS - 6

ER -