Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint

A web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice

Claire Snyder, Amanda L. Blackford, Antonio C Wolff, Michael A Carducci, Joseph M. Herman, Albert W Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The PatientViewpoint website collects patient-reported outcomes and links them with the electronic health record to aid patient management. This pilot test evaluated PatientViewpoint's use, usefulness, and acceptability to patients and clinicians. Methods This was a single-arm prospective study that enrolled breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment and the clinicians who managed them. Patients completed patient-reported outcomes every 2 weeks, and clinicians could access the results for patient visits. Scores that were poor relative to norms or substantially worse than the previous assessment were highlighted. After three on-study visits, we assessed patient and clinician perspectives on PatientViewpoint using close-ended and open-ended questions. Results Eleven out of 12 eligible clinicians (92%) and 52/76 eligible patients (68%) enrolled. Patients completed a median of 71% of assigned questionnaires; clinicians reported using the information for 79% of patients, most commonly as a source of additional information (51%). At the median, score reports identified three potential issues, of which 1 was discussed during the visit. Patients reported the system was easy to use (92%), useful (70%), aided recall of symptoms/side effects (72%), helped them feel more in control of their care (60%), improved discussions with their provider (49%), and improved care quality (39%). Patients and clinicians desired more information on score interpretation and minor adjustments to site navigation. Conclusions These results support the feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint. An ongoing study is using a continuous quality improvement approach to further refine PatientViewpoint. Future studies will evaluate its impact on patient care and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)895-901
Number of pages7
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Patient Outcome Assessment
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Electronic Health Records
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement

Keywords

  • cancer
  • clinical practice
  • electronic data collection
  • oncology
  • patient-reported outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint : A web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. / Snyder, Claire; Blackford, Amanda L.; Wolff, Antonio C; Carducci, Michael A; Herman, Joseph M.; Wu, Albert W.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 895-901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e6af8173b574941b790d28da20b5584,
title = "Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: A web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice",
abstract = "Background The PatientViewpoint website collects patient-reported outcomes and links them with the electronic health record to aid patient management. This pilot test evaluated PatientViewpoint's use, usefulness, and acceptability to patients and clinicians. Methods This was a single-arm prospective study that enrolled breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment and the clinicians who managed them. Patients completed patient-reported outcomes every 2 weeks, and clinicians could access the results for patient visits. Scores that were poor relative to norms or substantially worse than the previous assessment were highlighted. After three on-study visits, we assessed patient and clinician perspectives on PatientViewpoint using close-ended and open-ended questions. Results Eleven out of 12 eligible clinicians (92{\%}) and 52/76 eligible patients (68{\%}) enrolled. Patients completed a median of 71{\%} of assigned questionnaires; clinicians reported using the information for 79{\%} of patients, most commonly as a source of additional information (51{\%}). At the median, score reports identified three potential issues, of which 1 was discussed during the visit. Patients reported the system was easy to use (92{\%}), useful (70{\%}), aided recall of symptoms/side effects (72{\%}), helped them feel more in control of their care (60{\%}), improved discussions with their provider (49{\%}), and improved care quality (39{\%}). Patients and clinicians desired more information on score interpretation and minor adjustments to site navigation. Conclusions These results support the feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint. An ongoing study is using a continuous quality improvement approach to further refine PatientViewpoint. Future studies will evaluate its impact on patient care and outcomes.",
keywords = "cancer, clinical practice, electronic data collection, oncology, patient-reported outcomes",
author = "Claire Snyder and Blackford, {Amanda L.} and Wolff, {Antonio C} and Carducci, {Michael A} and Herman, {Joseph M.} and Wu, {Albert W}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/pon.3087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "895--901",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint

T2 - A web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice

AU - Snyder, Claire

AU - Blackford, Amanda L.

AU - Wolff, Antonio C

AU - Carducci, Michael A

AU - Herman, Joseph M.

AU - Wu, Albert W

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background The PatientViewpoint website collects patient-reported outcomes and links them with the electronic health record to aid patient management. This pilot test evaluated PatientViewpoint's use, usefulness, and acceptability to patients and clinicians. Methods This was a single-arm prospective study that enrolled breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment and the clinicians who managed them. Patients completed patient-reported outcomes every 2 weeks, and clinicians could access the results for patient visits. Scores that were poor relative to norms or substantially worse than the previous assessment were highlighted. After three on-study visits, we assessed patient and clinician perspectives on PatientViewpoint using close-ended and open-ended questions. Results Eleven out of 12 eligible clinicians (92%) and 52/76 eligible patients (68%) enrolled. Patients completed a median of 71% of assigned questionnaires; clinicians reported using the information for 79% of patients, most commonly as a source of additional information (51%). At the median, score reports identified three potential issues, of which 1 was discussed during the visit. Patients reported the system was easy to use (92%), useful (70%), aided recall of symptoms/side effects (72%), helped them feel more in control of their care (60%), improved discussions with their provider (49%), and improved care quality (39%). Patients and clinicians desired more information on score interpretation and minor adjustments to site navigation. Conclusions These results support the feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint. An ongoing study is using a continuous quality improvement approach to further refine PatientViewpoint. Future studies will evaluate its impact on patient care and outcomes.

AB - Background The PatientViewpoint website collects patient-reported outcomes and links them with the electronic health record to aid patient management. This pilot test evaluated PatientViewpoint's use, usefulness, and acceptability to patients and clinicians. Methods This was a single-arm prospective study that enrolled breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment and the clinicians who managed them. Patients completed patient-reported outcomes every 2 weeks, and clinicians could access the results for patient visits. Scores that were poor relative to norms or substantially worse than the previous assessment were highlighted. After three on-study visits, we assessed patient and clinician perspectives on PatientViewpoint using close-ended and open-ended questions. Results Eleven out of 12 eligible clinicians (92%) and 52/76 eligible patients (68%) enrolled. Patients completed a median of 71% of assigned questionnaires; clinicians reported using the information for 79% of patients, most commonly as a source of additional information (51%). At the median, score reports identified three potential issues, of which 1 was discussed during the visit. Patients reported the system was easy to use (92%), useful (70%), aided recall of symptoms/side effects (72%), helped them feel more in control of their care (60%), improved discussions with their provider (49%), and improved care quality (39%). Patients and clinicians desired more information on score interpretation and minor adjustments to site navigation. Conclusions These results support the feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint. An ongoing study is using a continuous quality improvement approach to further refine PatientViewpoint. Future studies will evaluate its impact on patient care and outcomes.

KW - cancer

KW - clinical practice

KW - electronic data collection

KW - oncology

KW - patient-reported outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876037763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876037763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.3087

DO - 10.1002/pon.3087

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 895

EP - 901

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 4

ER -