Father- and Youth-Reported Family Affective Expression Differentially Predicts Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms

Jill Rabinowitz, Ijeoma Osigwe, Ashley Byrne, Deborah A.G. Drabick, Maureen D. Reynolds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Temperamental approach is associated with adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Negative family affective expression, or problematic communication about emotions, is also associated with youth’s risk for symptoms. However, it is unclear whether negative family affective expression differentially predicts symptoms based on (a) youth’s temperamental approach and (b) informants’ perceptions of negative family affective expression. To address these issues, we explored whether mother-, father-, and youth-reported negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth temperamental approach and symptoms. Participants were 775 youths (71% male, 76% Caucasian) assessed at ages 10–12 (Time 1) and 12–14 (Time 2). Mothers, fathers, and youths reported on negative family affective expression and youths reported on temperamental approach at Time 1. Teachers reported on youth symptoms at Times 1 and 2. Youth- and father-reported, but not mother-reported, negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth approach and symptoms. When youths reported higher negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. In contrast, when fathers reported lower negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. Assessments and interventions for youth symptoms should include not only temperamental features, but also multiple informants’ perspectives of family affective expression. Such efforts could promote greater family communication, address problematic family dynamics, and potentially attenuate risk for youth symptoms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S264-S277
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume47
Issue numbersup1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 21 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fathers
Mothers
Communication
Family Relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Father- and Youth-Reported Family Affective Expression Differentially Predicts Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms. / Rabinowitz, Jill; Osigwe, Ijeoma; Byrne, Ashley; Drabick, Deborah A.G.; Reynolds, Maureen D.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 47, No. sup1, 21.12.2018, p. S264-S277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rabinowitz, Jill ; Osigwe, Ijeoma ; Byrne, Ashley ; Drabick, Deborah A.G. ; Reynolds, Maureen D. / Father- and Youth-Reported Family Affective Expression Differentially Predicts Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms. In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 47, No. sup1. pp. S264-S277.
@article{6cb995afe5584775962067ed313bca7b,
title = "Father- and Youth-Reported Family Affective Expression Differentially Predicts Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms",
abstract = "Temperamental approach is associated with adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Negative family affective expression, or problematic communication about emotions, is also associated with youth’s risk for symptoms. However, it is unclear whether negative family affective expression differentially predicts symptoms based on (a) youth’s temperamental approach and (b) informants’ perceptions of negative family affective expression. To address these issues, we explored whether mother-, father-, and youth-reported negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth temperamental approach and symptoms. Participants were 775 youths (71{\%} male, 76{\%} Caucasian) assessed at ages 10–12 (Time 1) and 12–14 (Time 2). Mothers, fathers, and youths reported on negative family affective expression and youths reported on temperamental approach at Time 1. Teachers reported on youth symptoms at Times 1 and 2. Youth- and father-reported, but not mother-reported, negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth approach and symptoms. When youths reported higher negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. In contrast, when fathers reported lower negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. Assessments and interventions for youth symptoms should include not only temperamental features, but also multiple informants’ perspectives of family affective expression. Such efforts could promote greater family communication, address problematic family dynamics, and potentially attenuate risk for youth symptoms.",
author = "Jill Rabinowitz and Ijeoma Osigwe and Ashley Byrne and Drabick, {Deborah A.G.} and Reynolds, {Maureen D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/15374416.2017.1280801",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "S264--S277",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "1537-4416",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "sup1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Father- and Youth-Reported Family Affective Expression Differentially Predicts Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms

AU - Rabinowitz, Jill

AU - Osigwe, Ijeoma

AU - Byrne, Ashley

AU - Drabick, Deborah A.G.

AU - Reynolds, Maureen D.

PY - 2018/12/21

Y1 - 2018/12/21

N2 - Temperamental approach is associated with adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Negative family affective expression, or problematic communication about emotions, is also associated with youth’s risk for symptoms. However, it is unclear whether negative family affective expression differentially predicts symptoms based on (a) youth’s temperamental approach and (b) informants’ perceptions of negative family affective expression. To address these issues, we explored whether mother-, father-, and youth-reported negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth temperamental approach and symptoms. Participants were 775 youths (71% male, 76% Caucasian) assessed at ages 10–12 (Time 1) and 12–14 (Time 2). Mothers, fathers, and youths reported on negative family affective expression and youths reported on temperamental approach at Time 1. Teachers reported on youth symptoms at Times 1 and 2. Youth- and father-reported, but not mother-reported, negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth approach and symptoms. When youths reported higher negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. In contrast, when fathers reported lower negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. Assessments and interventions for youth symptoms should include not only temperamental features, but also multiple informants’ perspectives of family affective expression. Such efforts could promote greater family communication, address problematic family dynamics, and potentially attenuate risk for youth symptoms.

AB - Temperamental approach is associated with adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Negative family affective expression, or problematic communication about emotions, is also associated with youth’s risk for symptoms. However, it is unclear whether negative family affective expression differentially predicts symptoms based on (a) youth’s temperamental approach and (b) informants’ perceptions of negative family affective expression. To address these issues, we explored whether mother-, father-, and youth-reported negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth temperamental approach and symptoms. Participants were 775 youths (71% male, 76% Caucasian) assessed at ages 10–12 (Time 1) and 12–14 (Time 2). Mothers, fathers, and youths reported on negative family affective expression and youths reported on temperamental approach at Time 1. Teachers reported on youth symptoms at Times 1 and 2. Youth- and father-reported, but not mother-reported, negative family affective expression moderated the relation between youth approach and symptoms. When youths reported higher negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. In contrast, when fathers reported lower negative family affective expression, youths lower in approach exhibited higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms than youths higher in approach. Assessments and interventions for youth symptoms should include not only temperamental features, but also multiple informants’ perspectives of family affective expression. Such efforts could promote greater family communication, address problematic family dynamics, and potentially attenuate risk for youth symptoms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014527383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014527383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280801

DO - 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280801

M3 - Article

C2 - 28278595

AN - SCOPUS:85014527383

VL - 47

SP - S264-S277

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 1537-4416

IS - sup1

ER -