Family caregiving and all-cause mortality: Findings from a population-based propensity-matched analysis

David L. Roth, William E. Haley, Martha Hovater, Martinique Perkins, Virginia G. Wadley, Suzanne Judd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous studies have provided conflicting evidence on whether being a family caregiver is associated with increased or decreased risk for all-cause mortality. This study examined whether 3,503 family caregivers enrolled in the national Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study showed differences in all-cause mortality from 2003 to 2012 compared with a propensity-matched sample of noncaregivers. Caregivers were individually matched with 3,503 noncaregivers by using a propensity score matching procedure based on 15 demographic, health history, and health behavior covariates. During an average 6-year follow-up period, 264 (7.5%) of the caregivers died, which was significantly fewer than the 315 (9.0%) matched noncaregivers who died during the same period. A proportional hazards model indicated that caregivers had an 18% reduced rate of death compared with noncaregivers (hazard ratio = 0.823, 95% confidence interval: 0.699, 0.969). Subgroup analyses by race, sex, caregiving relationship, and caregiving strain failed to identify any subgroups with increased rates of death compared with matched noncaregivers. Public policy and discourse should recognize that providing care to a family member with a chronic illness or disability is not associated with increased risk of death in most cases, but may instead be associated with modest survival benefits for the caregivers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1571-1578
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of epidemiology
Volume178
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Family caregiving and all-cause mortality: Findings from a population-based propensity-matched analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this