Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery

G. Spolverato, A. Ejaz, O. Hyder, Y. Kim, T. M. Pawlik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The mechanisms that underlie the association between high surgical volume and improved outcomes remain uncertain. This study examined the impact of complications and failure to rescue patients from these complications on mortality following hepatic resection. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who had liver surgery between 2000 and 2010. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles (low, intermediate and high). Rates of major complications, failure to rescue and mortality following hepatic surgery were compared. Results Some 9874 patients were identified. The major complication rate was 19·6 per cent in low-volume, 19·3 per cent in intermediate-volume and 16·6 per cent in high-volume hospitals (P <0·001). Most common major complications included respiratory insufficiency or failure (8·8 per cent), acute renal failure (4·2 per cent) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3·9 per cent), with each of these complications being less common in high-volume hospitals (P <0·050). The incidence of major morbidity following hepatectomy remained the same over the past decade, but failure to rescue patients from these complications decreased (P = 0·011). The overall inpatient mortality rate following liver surgery was 3·2 per cent (3·8, 3·6 and 2·3 per cent for low-, intermediate- and high-volume hospitals respectively; P <0·001). The rate of failure to rescue (death after a complication) was higher at low- and intermediate-volume hospitals (16·8 and 16·1 per cent respectively) compared with high-volume hospitals (11·8 per cent) (P = 0·032). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients treated at low-volume hospitals who had a complication were 40 per cent more likely to die than patients with a complication in a high-volume hospital (odds ratio 1·40, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·02 to 1·93). Conclusion The risk of death following hepatic surgery is lower at high-volume hospitals. The reduction in mortality appears to be the result of both lower complication rates and a better ability in high-volume hospitals to rescue patients with major complications. High volume is associated with lower morbidity and mortality

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)836-846
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume101
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

High-Volume Hospitals
Hospital Mortality
Liver
Low-Volume Hospitals
Mortality
Respiratory Insufficiency
Inpatients
Morbidity
Hepatectomy
Acute Kidney Injury
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Hemorrhage
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery. / Spolverato, G.; Ejaz, A.; Hyder, O.; Kim, Y.; Pawlik, T. M.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 101, No. 7, 2014, p. 836-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spolverato, G, Ejaz, A, Hyder, O, Kim, Y & Pawlik, TM 2014, 'Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 836-846. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9492
Spolverato, G. ; Ejaz, A. ; Hyder, O. ; Kim, Y. ; Pawlik, T. M. / Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 101, No. 7. pp. 836-846.
@article{f465bd48614c4576be5b72b538093cec,
title = "Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery",
abstract = "Background The mechanisms that underlie the association between high surgical volume and improved outcomes remain uncertain. This study examined the impact of complications and failure to rescue patients from these complications on mortality following hepatic resection. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who had liver surgery between 2000 and 2010. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles (low, intermediate and high). Rates of major complications, failure to rescue and mortality following hepatic surgery were compared. Results Some 9874 patients were identified. The major complication rate was 19·6 per cent in low-volume, 19·3 per cent in intermediate-volume and 16·6 per cent in high-volume hospitals (P <0·001). Most common major complications included respiratory insufficiency or failure (8·8 per cent), acute renal failure (4·2 per cent) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3·9 per cent), with each of these complications being less common in high-volume hospitals (P <0·050). The incidence of major morbidity following hepatectomy remained the same over the past decade, but failure to rescue patients from these complications decreased (P = 0·011). The overall inpatient mortality rate following liver surgery was 3·2 per cent (3·8, 3·6 and 2·3 per cent for low-, intermediate- and high-volume hospitals respectively; P <0·001). The rate of failure to rescue (death after a complication) was higher at low- and intermediate-volume hospitals (16·8 and 16·1 per cent respectively) compared with high-volume hospitals (11·8 per cent) (P = 0·032). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients treated at low-volume hospitals who had a complication were 40 per cent more likely to die than patients with a complication in a high-volume hospital (odds ratio 1·40, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·02 to 1·93). Conclusion The risk of death following hepatic surgery is lower at high-volume hospitals. The reduction in mortality appears to be the result of both lower complication rates and a better ability in high-volume hospitals to rescue patients with major complications. High volume is associated with lower morbidity and mortality",
author = "G. Spolverato and A. Ejaz and O. Hyder and Y. Kim and Pawlik, {T. M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.9492",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "836--846",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery

AU - Spolverato, G.

AU - Ejaz, A.

AU - Hyder, O.

AU - Kim, Y.

AU - Pawlik, T. M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background The mechanisms that underlie the association between high surgical volume and improved outcomes remain uncertain. This study examined the impact of complications and failure to rescue patients from these complications on mortality following hepatic resection. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who had liver surgery between 2000 and 2010. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles (low, intermediate and high). Rates of major complications, failure to rescue and mortality following hepatic surgery were compared. Results Some 9874 patients were identified. The major complication rate was 19·6 per cent in low-volume, 19·3 per cent in intermediate-volume and 16·6 per cent in high-volume hospitals (P <0·001). Most common major complications included respiratory insufficiency or failure (8·8 per cent), acute renal failure (4·2 per cent) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3·9 per cent), with each of these complications being less common in high-volume hospitals (P <0·050). The incidence of major morbidity following hepatectomy remained the same over the past decade, but failure to rescue patients from these complications decreased (P = 0·011). The overall inpatient mortality rate following liver surgery was 3·2 per cent (3·8, 3·6 and 2·3 per cent for low-, intermediate- and high-volume hospitals respectively; P <0·001). The rate of failure to rescue (death after a complication) was higher at low- and intermediate-volume hospitals (16·8 and 16·1 per cent respectively) compared with high-volume hospitals (11·8 per cent) (P = 0·032). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients treated at low-volume hospitals who had a complication were 40 per cent more likely to die than patients with a complication in a high-volume hospital (odds ratio 1·40, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·02 to 1·93). Conclusion The risk of death following hepatic surgery is lower at high-volume hospitals. The reduction in mortality appears to be the result of both lower complication rates and a better ability in high-volume hospitals to rescue patients with major complications. High volume is associated with lower morbidity and mortality

AB - Background The mechanisms that underlie the association between high surgical volume and improved outcomes remain uncertain. This study examined the impact of complications and failure to rescue patients from these complications on mortality following hepatic resection. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who had liver surgery between 2000 and 2010. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles (low, intermediate and high). Rates of major complications, failure to rescue and mortality following hepatic surgery were compared. Results Some 9874 patients were identified. The major complication rate was 19·6 per cent in low-volume, 19·3 per cent in intermediate-volume and 16·6 per cent in high-volume hospitals (P <0·001). Most common major complications included respiratory insufficiency or failure (8·8 per cent), acute renal failure (4·2 per cent) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3·9 per cent), with each of these complications being less common in high-volume hospitals (P <0·050). The incidence of major morbidity following hepatectomy remained the same over the past decade, but failure to rescue patients from these complications decreased (P = 0·011). The overall inpatient mortality rate following liver surgery was 3·2 per cent (3·8, 3·6 and 2·3 per cent for low-, intermediate- and high-volume hospitals respectively; P <0·001). The rate of failure to rescue (death after a complication) was higher at low- and intermediate-volume hospitals (16·8 and 16·1 per cent respectively) compared with high-volume hospitals (11·8 per cent) (P = 0·032). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients treated at low-volume hospitals who had a complication were 40 per cent more likely to die than patients with a complication in a high-volume hospital (odds ratio 1·40, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·02 to 1·93). Conclusion The risk of death following hepatic surgery is lower at high-volume hospitals. The reduction in mortality appears to be the result of both lower complication rates and a better ability in high-volume hospitals to rescue patients with major complications. High volume is associated with lower morbidity and mortality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900493224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900493224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.9492

DO - 10.1002/bjs.9492

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 836

EP - 846

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 7

ER -