Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: The "Occult" male factor

Sergio Oehninger, Anibal A. Acosta, Thinus Kruger, Lucinda L. Veeck, Jill Flood, Howard W. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Failure of fertilization in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) deserves extensive analysis for better prediction of the success or failure of this therapeutic modality. Consequently, we retrospectively studied the 52 couples in whom fertilization failed during Norfolk series 18 to 25, in an effort to establish the precise causes of failure. In the initial evaluation, pure oocyte abnormalities were identified in 19.2% of the cases; 32.6% showed sperm abnormalities, and a combination of oocyte and sperm anomalies was found in 7.7%. In 40.4% of the cases, failure of fertilization could not be explained. Re-assessment of sperm morphology by new, strict criteria increased the identification of sperm abnormalities to 61.5% and of combined sperm and oocyte anomalies to 13.4%, for a total of 74.9% of sperm factors involved, as opposed to 40.3% in the original evaluation. The incidence of unexplained failed fertilization was substantially reduced, to 11.5%. In a control group (tubal infertility) matched by age, date, and stimulation, in whom fertilization occurred, 83.3% had normal sperm parameters as judged by the new criteria for morphology evaluation. This paper emphasizes the need for a more accurate diagnosis of sperm abnormalities to establish the true incidence of this factor in failed fertilization and to obtain information of prognostic value to patients and clinicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-187
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fertilization in Vitro
Fertilization
Spermatozoa
Oocytes
Incidence
Infertility
Control Groups

Keywords

  • abnormal sperm morphology
  • failure of fertilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Embryology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

Oehninger, S., Acosta, A. A., Kruger, T., Veeck, L. L., Flood, J., & Jones, H. W. (1988). Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: The "Occult" male factor. Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 5(4), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131119

Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization : The "Occult" male factor. / Oehninger, Sergio; Acosta, Anibal A.; Kruger, Thinus; Veeck, Lucinda L.; Flood, Jill; Jones, Howard W.

In: Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, Vol. 5, No. 4, 08.1988, p. 181-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oehninger, S, Acosta, AA, Kruger, T, Veeck, LL, Flood, J & Jones, HW 1988, 'Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: The "Occult" male factor', Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131119
Oehninger, Sergio ; Acosta, Anibal A. ; Kruger, Thinus ; Veeck, Lucinda L. ; Flood, Jill ; Jones, Howard W. / Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization : The "Occult" male factor. In: Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. 1988 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 181-187.
@article{88f33b90c2374694a1867d40018415ad,
title = "Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: The {"}Occult{"} male factor",
abstract = "Failure of fertilization in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) deserves extensive analysis for better prediction of the success or failure of this therapeutic modality. Consequently, we retrospectively studied the 52 couples in whom fertilization failed during Norfolk series 18 to 25, in an effort to establish the precise causes of failure. In the initial evaluation, pure oocyte abnormalities were identified in 19.2{\%} of the cases; 32.6{\%} showed sperm abnormalities, and a combination of oocyte and sperm anomalies was found in 7.7{\%}. In 40.4{\%} of the cases, failure of fertilization could not be explained. Re-assessment of sperm morphology by new, strict criteria increased the identification of sperm abnormalities to 61.5{\%} and of combined sperm and oocyte anomalies to 13.4{\%}, for a total of 74.9{\%} of sperm factors involved, as opposed to 40.3{\%} in the original evaluation. The incidence of unexplained failed fertilization was substantially reduced, to 11.5{\%}. In a control group (tubal infertility) matched by age, date, and stimulation, in whom fertilization occurred, 83.3{\%} had normal sperm parameters as judged by the new criteria for morphology evaluation. This paper emphasizes the need for a more accurate diagnosis of sperm abnormalities to establish the true incidence of this factor in failed fertilization and to obtain information of prognostic value to patients and clinicians.",
keywords = "abnormal sperm morphology, failure of fertilization",
author = "Sergio Oehninger and Acosta, {Anibal A.} and Thinus Kruger and Veeck, {Lucinda L.} and Jill Flood and Jones, {Howard W.}",
year = "1988",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/BF01131119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "181--187",
journal = "Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics",
issn = "1058-0468",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization

T2 - The "Occult" male factor

AU - Oehninger, Sergio

AU - Acosta, Anibal A.

AU - Kruger, Thinus

AU - Veeck, Lucinda L.

AU - Flood, Jill

AU - Jones, Howard W.

PY - 1988/8

Y1 - 1988/8

N2 - Failure of fertilization in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) deserves extensive analysis for better prediction of the success or failure of this therapeutic modality. Consequently, we retrospectively studied the 52 couples in whom fertilization failed during Norfolk series 18 to 25, in an effort to establish the precise causes of failure. In the initial evaluation, pure oocyte abnormalities were identified in 19.2% of the cases; 32.6% showed sperm abnormalities, and a combination of oocyte and sperm anomalies was found in 7.7%. In 40.4% of the cases, failure of fertilization could not be explained. Re-assessment of sperm morphology by new, strict criteria increased the identification of sperm abnormalities to 61.5% and of combined sperm and oocyte anomalies to 13.4%, for a total of 74.9% of sperm factors involved, as opposed to 40.3% in the original evaluation. The incidence of unexplained failed fertilization was substantially reduced, to 11.5%. In a control group (tubal infertility) matched by age, date, and stimulation, in whom fertilization occurred, 83.3% had normal sperm parameters as judged by the new criteria for morphology evaluation. This paper emphasizes the need for a more accurate diagnosis of sperm abnormalities to establish the true incidence of this factor in failed fertilization and to obtain information of prognostic value to patients and clinicians.

AB - Failure of fertilization in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) deserves extensive analysis for better prediction of the success or failure of this therapeutic modality. Consequently, we retrospectively studied the 52 couples in whom fertilization failed during Norfolk series 18 to 25, in an effort to establish the precise causes of failure. In the initial evaluation, pure oocyte abnormalities were identified in 19.2% of the cases; 32.6% showed sperm abnormalities, and a combination of oocyte and sperm anomalies was found in 7.7%. In 40.4% of the cases, failure of fertilization could not be explained. Re-assessment of sperm morphology by new, strict criteria increased the identification of sperm abnormalities to 61.5% and of combined sperm and oocyte anomalies to 13.4%, for a total of 74.9% of sperm factors involved, as opposed to 40.3% in the original evaluation. The incidence of unexplained failed fertilization was substantially reduced, to 11.5%. In a control group (tubal infertility) matched by age, date, and stimulation, in whom fertilization occurred, 83.3% had normal sperm parameters as judged by the new criteria for morphology evaluation. This paper emphasizes the need for a more accurate diagnosis of sperm abnormalities to establish the true incidence of this factor in failed fertilization and to obtain information of prognostic value to patients and clinicians.

KW - abnormal sperm morphology

KW - failure of fertilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023805455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023805455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01131119

DO - 10.1007/BF01131119

M3 - Article

C2 - 3183464

AN - SCOPUS:0023805455

VL - 5

SP - 181

EP - 187

JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

SN - 1058-0468

IS - 4

ER -