Faculty involvement in translational research and interdisciplinary collaboration at a US academic medical center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Forty-six academic health centers have been awarded Clinical and Translational Science Awards by the National Institutes of Health to enhance health by advancing translational research. Objective: As a recipient of a Clinical and Translational Science Award, we aimed to determine the prevalence of translational and interdisciplinary collaboration at our institution. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed all full-time faculty and postdoctoral fellows (n = 3870) in the Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine, Public Health, Nursing and Engineering, in late 2008. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included (1) the proportion of investigators involved in early (T1), late (T2), and reverse translational (RT) research; (2) barriers to translational research; (3) attitudes about translational research; (4) involvement in interdisciplinary collaboration; and (5) barriers to collaboration. Results: With 1800 respondents, the response rate was 55% for faculty and 40% for postdoctoral fellows. Of the 1314 investigators with more than 30% of their time committed to research, 69% reported conducting 1 or more types of translational research (T1 = 79%, T2 = 36%, RT = 36%). Attitudes about translational research revealed both concern and uncertainty. Fifty-four percent of respondents described translational research as having complex regulatory requirements; 42% felt that an individual's contributions suffer from underrecognition, 39% described it as high risk, and 35% consider funding less secure for translational researchers. Collaboration across school and types of research was common. Forty-seven percent of basic scientists collaborated with a clinical investigator in the last year, and 56% of clinical investigators collaborated with a basic scientist. Conclusions: Overall, investigators who did translational research reported a greater number of collaborators than those who did not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)770-776
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Investigative Medicine
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Translational Medical Research
Research Personnel
Health
Public Health Nursing
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research
Nursing
Uncertainty
Public health
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Barriers
  • Clinical and Translational research
  • Collaboration
  • Interdisciplinary research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{665c13a0b1754860851ce5e1d7cdb803,
title = "Faculty involvement in translational research and interdisciplinary collaboration at a US academic medical center",
abstract = "Background: Forty-six academic health centers have been awarded Clinical and Translational Science Awards by the National Institutes of Health to enhance health by advancing translational research. Objective: As a recipient of a Clinical and Translational Science Award, we aimed to determine the prevalence of translational and interdisciplinary collaboration at our institution. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed all full-time faculty and postdoctoral fellows (n = 3870) in the Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine, Public Health, Nursing and Engineering, in late 2008. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included (1) the proportion of investigators involved in early (T1), late (T2), and reverse translational (RT) research; (2) barriers to translational research; (3) attitudes about translational research; (4) involvement in interdisciplinary collaboration; and (5) barriers to collaboration. Results: With 1800 respondents, the response rate was 55{\%} for faculty and 40{\%} for postdoctoral fellows. Of the 1314 investigators with more than 30{\%} of their time committed to research, 69{\%} reported conducting 1 or more types of translational research (T1 = 79{\%}, T2 = 36{\%}, RT = 36{\%}). Attitudes about translational research revealed both concern and uncertainty. Fifty-four percent of respondents described translational research as having complex regulatory requirements; 42{\%} felt that an individual's contributions suffer from underrecognition, 39{\%} described it as high risk, and 35{\%} consider funding less secure for translational researchers. Collaboration across school and types of research was common. Forty-seven percent of basic scientists collaborated with a clinical investigator in the last year, and 56{\%} of clinical investigators collaborated with a basic scientist. Conclusions: Overall, investigators who did translational research reported a greater number of collaborators than those who did not.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Barriers, Clinical and Translational research, Collaboration, Interdisciplinary research",
author = "Christine Weston and Bass, {Eric B} and Ford, {Daniel E} and Jodi Segal",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.231/JIM.0b013e3181e70a78",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "770--776",
journal = "Journal of Investigative Medicine",
issn = "1081-5589",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty involvement in translational research and interdisciplinary collaboration at a US academic medical center

AU - Weston, Christine

AU - Bass, Eric B

AU - Ford, Daniel E

AU - Segal, Jodi

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Background: Forty-six academic health centers have been awarded Clinical and Translational Science Awards by the National Institutes of Health to enhance health by advancing translational research. Objective: As a recipient of a Clinical and Translational Science Award, we aimed to determine the prevalence of translational and interdisciplinary collaboration at our institution. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed all full-time faculty and postdoctoral fellows (n = 3870) in the Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine, Public Health, Nursing and Engineering, in late 2008. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included (1) the proportion of investigators involved in early (T1), late (T2), and reverse translational (RT) research; (2) barriers to translational research; (3) attitudes about translational research; (4) involvement in interdisciplinary collaboration; and (5) barriers to collaboration. Results: With 1800 respondents, the response rate was 55% for faculty and 40% for postdoctoral fellows. Of the 1314 investigators with more than 30% of their time committed to research, 69% reported conducting 1 or more types of translational research (T1 = 79%, T2 = 36%, RT = 36%). Attitudes about translational research revealed both concern and uncertainty. Fifty-four percent of respondents described translational research as having complex regulatory requirements; 42% felt that an individual's contributions suffer from underrecognition, 39% described it as high risk, and 35% consider funding less secure for translational researchers. Collaboration across school and types of research was common. Forty-seven percent of basic scientists collaborated with a clinical investigator in the last year, and 56% of clinical investigators collaborated with a basic scientist. Conclusions: Overall, investigators who did translational research reported a greater number of collaborators than those who did not.

AB - Background: Forty-six academic health centers have been awarded Clinical and Translational Science Awards by the National Institutes of Health to enhance health by advancing translational research. Objective: As a recipient of a Clinical and Translational Science Award, we aimed to determine the prevalence of translational and interdisciplinary collaboration at our institution. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed all full-time faculty and postdoctoral fellows (n = 3870) in the Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine, Public Health, Nursing and Engineering, in late 2008. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included (1) the proportion of investigators involved in early (T1), late (T2), and reverse translational (RT) research; (2) barriers to translational research; (3) attitudes about translational research; (4) involvement in interdisciplinary collaboration; and (5) barriers to collaboration. Results: With 1800 respondents, the response rate was 55% for faculty and 40% for postdoctoral fellows. Of the 1314 investigators with more than 30% of their time committed to research, 69% reported conducting 1 or more types of translational research (T1 = 79%, T2 = 36%, RT = 36%). Attitudes about translational research revealed both concern and uncertainty. Fifty-four percent of respondents described translational research as having complex regulatory requirements; 42% felt that an individual's contributions suffer from underrecognition, 39% described it as high risk, and 35% consider funding less secure for translational researchers. Collaboration across school and types of research was common. Forty-seven percent of basic scientists collaborated with a clinical investigator in the last year, and 56% of clinical investigators collaborated with a basic scientist. Conclusions: Overall, investigators who did translational research reported a greater number of collaborators than those who did not.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Barriers

KW - Clinical and Translational research

KW - Collaboration

KW - Interdisciplinary research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957982709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957982709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.231/JIM.0b013e3181e70a78

DO - 10.231/JIM.0b013e3181e70a78

M3 - Article

C2 - 20517162

AN - SCOPUS:77957982709

VL - 58

SP - 770

EP - 776

JO - Journal of Investigative Medicine

JF - Journal of Investigative Medicine

SN - 1081-5589

IS - 6

ER -