Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research: A survey at one urban academic institution

Clara Goldberg-Freeman, Nancy E Kass, Andrea Gielen, Patricia Tracey, Barbara Bates-Hopkins, Mark Farfel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

HEALTH RESEARCHERS ARE increasingly interested in how best to engage communities in their health-related research studies. To help determine how researchers have interacted with community members in their research, we conducted a survey of full-time faculty from the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions regarding researchers' beliefs and experiences with community-based research. Approximately 41% of respondents who conducted human subject studies had enrolled local residents in their research. Researchers whose studies were based in the surrounding community were significantly more likely to involve community members in all stages of their research (e.g., selection of the problem, project planning, data collection, interpretation and dissemination of results, or developing an intervention) than were faculty whose studies enrolled community members as research participants but whose studies were not set in the community. Over 90% of all faculty respondents agree that community involvement improves the relevance of their research, although almost 60% had not done so. Most faculty value community involvement, but they want more institutional support for such activities and they seek better skills to involve community. Few studies have surveyed researchers who enroll community members as research participants to document practices regarding community involvement in the research process. Given that the majority (73.6%) of faculty responded that they intend to include local residents in their upcoming studies, future research to evaluate interventions designed to facilitate community involvement, especially in the inner city, would help stakeholders identify best practices for involving and engaging communities in health research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-76
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Research
community
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Community Participation
Health
planning data
resident
Practice Guidelines
project planning
research process
health
Planning
best practice
stakeholder
interpretation
Values
experience

Keywords

  • Academic-community partnerships
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Ethics
  • Faculty views
  • Participatory research
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Communication
  • Social Psychology
  • Law

Cite this

Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research : A survey at one urban academic institution. / Goldberg-Freeman, Clara; Kass, Nancy E; Gielen, Andrea; Tracey, Patricia; Bates-Hopkins, Barbara; Farfel, Mark.

In: Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 65-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a7f69214294480181152ba1d8a1063d,
title = "Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research: A survey at one urban academic institution",
abstract = "HEALTH RESEARCHERS ARE increasingly interested in how best to engage communities in their health-related research studies. To help determine how researchers have interacted with community members in their research, we conducted a survey of full-time faculty from the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions regarding researchers' beliefs and experiences with community-based research. Approximately 41{\%} of respondents who conducted human subject studies had enrolled local residents in their research. Researchers whose studies were based in the surrounding community were significantly more likely to involve community members in all stages of their research (e.g., selection of the problem, project planning, data collection, interpretation and dissemination of results, or developing an intervention) than were faculty whose studies enrolled community members as research participants but whose studies were not set in the community. Over 90{\%} of all faculty respondents agree that community involvement improves the relevance of their research, although almost 60{\%} had not done so. Most faculty value community involvement, but they want more institutional support for such activities and they seek better skills to involve community. Few studies have surveyed researchers who enroll community members as research participants to document practices regarding community involvement in the research process. Given that the majority (73.6{\%}) of faculty responded that they intend to include local residents in their upcoming studies, future research to evaluate interventions designed to facilitate community involvement, especially in the inner city, would help stakeholders identify best practices for involving and engaging communities in health research.",
keywords = "Academic-community partnerships, Community-based participatory research, Ethics, Faculty views, Participatory research, Survey",
author = "Clara Goldberg-Freeman and Kass, {Nancy E} and Andrea Gielen and Patricia Tracey and Barbara Bates-Hopkins and Mark Farfel",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.65",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "65--76",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics",
issn = "1556-2646",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research

T2 - A survey at one urban academic institution

AU - Goldberg-Freeman, Clara

AU - Kass, Nancy E

AU - Gielen, Andrea

AU - Tracey, Patricia

AU - Bates-Hopkins, Barbara

AU - Farfel, Mark

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - HEALTH RESEARCHERS ARE increasingly interested in how best to engage communities in their health-related research studies. To help determine how researchers have interacted with community members in their research, we conducted a survey of full-time faculty from the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions regarding researchers' beliefs and experiences with community-based research. Approximately 41% of respondents who conducted human subject studies had enrolled local residents in their research. Researchers whose studies were based in the surrounding community were significantly more likely to involve community members in all stages of their research (e.g., selection of the problem, project planning, data collection, interpretation and dissemination of results, or developing an intervention) than were faculty whose studies enrolled community members as research participants but whose studies were not set in the community. Over 90% of all faculty respondents agree that community involvement improves the relevance of their research, although almost 60% had not done so. Most faculty value community involvement, but they want more institutional support for such activities and they seek better skills to involve community. Few studies have surveyed researchers who enroll community members as research participants to document practices regarding community involvement in the research process. Given that the majority (73.6%) of faculty responded that they intend to include local residents in their upcoming studies, future research to evaluate interventions designed to facilitate community involvement, especially in the inner city, would help stakeholders identify best practices for involving and engaging communities in health research.

AB - HEALTH RESEARCHERS ARE increasingly interested in how best to engage communities in their health-related research studies. To help determine how researchers have interacted with community members in their research, we conducted a survey of full-time faculty from the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions regarding researchers' beliefs and experiences with community-based research. Approximately 41% of respondents who conducted human subject studies had enrolled local residents in their research. Researchers whose studies were based in the surrounding community were significantly more likely to involve community members in all stages of their research (e.g., selection of the problem, project planning, data collection, interpretation and dissemination of results, or developing an intervention) than were faculty whose studies enrolled community members as research participants but whose studies were not set in the community. Over 90% of all faculty respondents agree that community involvement improves the relevance of their research, although almost 60% had not done so. Most faculty value community involvement, but they want more institutional support for such activities and they seek better skills to involve community. Few studies have surveyed researchers who enroll community members as research participants to document practices regarding community involvement in the research process. Given that the majority (73.6%) of faculty responded that they intend to include local residents in their upcoming studies, future research to evaluate interventions designed to facilitate community involvement, especially in the inner city, would help stakeholders identify best practices for involving and engaging communities in health research.

KW - Academic-community partnerships

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Ethics

KW - Faculty views

KW - Participatory research

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650152806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650152806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.65

DO - 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.65

M3 - Article

C2 - 21133788

AN - SCOPUS:78650152806

VL - 5

SP - 65

EP - 76

JO - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

JF - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

SN - 1556-2646

IS - 4

ER -