Factors that predict for representation of women in physician graduate medical education

Christina H. Chapman, Wei Ting Hwang, Xingmei Wang, Curtiland Deville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background/Objective: To identify factors associated with underrepresentation of women in the largest medical specialties. Methods: The authors obtained specialty-specific data from the Association of American Medical Colleges, National Residency Match Program and Journal of the American Medical Association Graduate Medical Education Supplement from 2014 on the gender of trainees and faculty members, residency program director (PD)-rated importance of interview selection and rank list formation criteria, and characteristics of matched NRMP participants. They used linear regression to evaluate whether factors were associated with representation of female trainees in the 18 largest specialties that participated in the NRMP. They hypothesized that factors representing lower student exposure or higher research requirements would be associated with lower representation of women. Results: In 2014, representation of women as trainees ranged from 13.7% in Orthopedic Surgery to 82.5% in OB/Gyn. On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with specialties having lower percentages of female trainees were: not being part of the third year core (slope = 0.141, p = 0.002), having lower specialty mean step 1 scores (slope = 0.007, p = 0.017), and having lower percentages of female faculty members. For each 1% increase in female faculty, the percentage of female trainees increased by 1.45% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Two exposure-related factors, percentage of female faculty members and being part of the third year core, were associated with underrepresentation of women as trainees. Future research could help examine whether these are causal associations. Medical schools and training specialties should investigate whether strategies to enhance mentorship and increase exposure to non-core specialties will increase the proportion of women in fields in which they are underrepresented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1624132
JournalMedical education online
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

trainee
physician
graduate
education
proportion of women
medical association
surgery
supplement
director
regression
gender
interview
school
student

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • gender
  • graduate medical education
  • National Residency Match Program
  • specialty selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Factors that predict for representation of women in physician graduate medical education. / Chapman, Christina H.; Hwang, Wei Ting; Wang, Xingmei; Deville, Curtiland.

In: Medical education online, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1624132, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chapman, Christina H. ; Hwang, Wei Ting ; Wang, Xingmei ; Deville, Curtiland. / Factors that predict for representation of women in physician graduate medical education. In: Medical education online. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 1.
@article{042d732f8fa74cbc8957a989bb3a8d75,
title = "Factors that predict for representation of women in physician graduate medical education",
abstract = "Background/Objective: To identify factors associated with underrepresentation of women in the largest medical specialties. Methods: The authors obtained specialty-specific data from the Association of American Medical Colleges, National Residency Match Program and Journal of the American Medical Association Graduate Medical Education Supplement from 2014 on the gender of trainees and faculty members, residency program director (PD)-rated importance of interview selection and rank list formation criteria, and characteristics of matched NRMP participants. They used linear regression to evaluate whether factors were associated with representation of female trainees in the 18 largest specialties that participated in the NRMP. They hypothesized that factors representing lower student exposure or higher research requirements would be associated with lower representation of women. Results: In 2014, representation of women as trainees ranged from 13.7{\%} in Orthopedic Surgery to 82.5{\%} in OB/Gyn. On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with specialties having lower percentages of female trainees were: not being part of the third year core (slope = 0.141, p = 0.002), having lower specialty mean step 1 scores (slope = 0.007, p = 0.017), and having lower percentages of female faculty members. For each 1{\%} increase in female faculty, the percentage of female trainees increased by 1.45{\%} (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Two exposure-related factors, percentage of female faculty members and being part of the third year core, were associated with underrepresentation of women as trainees. Future research could help examine whether these are causal associations. Medical schools and training specialties should investigate whether strategies to enhance mentorship and increase exposure to non-core specialties will increase the proportion of women in fields in which they are underrepresented.",
keywords = "Diversity, gender, graduate medical education, National Residency Match Program, specialty selection",
author = "Chapman, {Christina H.} and Hwang, {Wei Ting} and Xingmei Wang and Curtiland Deville",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10872981.2019.1624132",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
journal = "Medical Education Online",
issn = "1087-2981",
publisher = "Co-Action Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors that predict for representation of women in physician graduate medical education

AU - Chapman, Christina H.

AU - Hwang, Wei Ting

AU - Wang, Xingmei

AU - Deville, Curtiland

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background/Objective: To identify factors associated with underrepresentation of women in the largest medical specialties. Methods: The authors obtained specialty-specific data from the Association of American Medical Colleges, National Residency Match Program and Journal of the American Medical Association Graduate Medical Education Supplement from 2014 on the gender of trainees and faculty members, residency program director (PD)-rated importance of interview selection and rank list formation criteria, and characteristics of matched NRMP participants. They used linear regression to evaluate whether factors were associated with representation of female trainees in the 18 largest specialties that participated in the NRMP. They hypothesized that factors representing lower student exposure or higher research requirements would be associated with lower representation of women. Results: In 2014, representation of women as trainees ranged from 13.7% in Orthopedic Surgery to 82.5% in OB/Gyn. On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with specialties having lower percentages of female trainees were: not being part of the third year core (slope = 0.141, p = 0.002), having lower specialty mean step 1 scores (slope = 0.007, p = 0.017), and having lower percentages of female faculty members. For each 1% increase in female faculty, the percentage of female trainees increased by 1.45% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Two exposure-related factors, percentage of female faculty members and being part of the third year core, were associated with underrepresentation of women as trainees. Future research could help examine whether these are causal associations. Medical schools and training specialties should investigate whether strategies to enhance mentorship and increase exposure to non-core specialties will increase the proportion of women in fields in which they are underrepresented.

AB - Background/Objective: To identify factors associated with underrepresentation of women in the largest medical specialties. Methods: The authors obtained specialty-specific data from the Association of American Medical Colleges, National Residency Match Program and Journal of the American Medical Association Graduate Medical Education Supplement from 2014 on the gender of trainees and faculty members, residency program director (PD)-rated importance of interview selection and rank list formation criteria, and characteristics of matched NRMP participants. They used linear regression to evaluate whether factors were associated with representation of female trainees in the 18 largest specialties that participated in the NRMP. They hypothesized that factors representing lower student exposure or higher research requirements would be associated with lower representation of women. Results: In 2014, representation of women as trainees ranged from 13.7% in Orthopedic Surgery to 82.5% in OB/Gyn. On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with specialties having lower percentages of female trainees were: not being part of the third year core (slope = 0.141, p = 0.002), having lower specialty mean step 1 scores (slope = 0.007, p = 0.017), and having lower percentages of female faculty members. For each 1% increase in female faculty, the percentage of female trainees increased by 1.45% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Two exposure-related factors, percentage of female faculty members and being part of the third year core, were associated with underrepresentation of women as trainees. Future research could help examine whether these are causal associations. Medical schools and training specialties should investigate whether strategies to enhance mentorship and increase exposure to non-core specialties will increase the proportion of women in fields in which they are underrepresented.

KW - Diversity

KW - gender

KW - graduate medical education

KW - National Residency Match Program

KW - specialty selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067351983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067351983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10872981.2019.1624132

DO - 10.1080/10872981.2019.1624132

M3 - Article

VL - 24

JO - Medical Education Online

JF - Medical Education Online

SN - 1087-2981

IS - 1

M1 - 1624132

ER -