Factors Associated With Perioperative Transfusion in Lower Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Under a Restrictive Blood Management Protocol

Sandesh S. Rao, Yash P. Chaudhry, Syed A. Hasan, Varun Puvanesarajah, Raj M. Amin, Julius K. Oni, Robert S. Sterling, Harpal S. Khanuja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction:Approximately 37% of patients undergoing lower extremity revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) receive allogeneic blood transfusions (ABTs), which are associated with increased risk of morbidity and death. It is important to identify patient factors associated with needing ABT because the health of higher-risk patients can be optimized preoperatively and their need for ABT can be minimized. Our goal was to identify the patient and surgical factors independently associated with perioperative ABT in revision TJA.Methods:We included all 251 lower extremity revision TJA cases performed at our academic tertiary care center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We assessed the following factors for associations with perioperative ABT: patient age, sex, race, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, and infection status (ie, infection as indication for revision TJA); use of vasopressors, tranexamic acid (TXA), surgical drains, tourniquets, and intraoperative cell salvage; and procedure type (hip versus knee), procedure complexity (according to the number of components revised), and surgical time. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors independently associated with perioperative ABT.Results:The following characteristics were independently associated with greater odds of perioperative ABT: preoperative hemoglobin level (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 2.2), infectious indication for revision (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.7), and procedure complexity. TXA use was a negative predictor of ABT (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.98). Compared with polyethylene liner exchanges, single-component revisions (OR, 14; 95% CI, 3.6 to 56) and dual-component revisions (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 2.3 to 26) were associated with greater odds of ABT.Discussion:Patients with preoperative anemia, those undergoing revision TJA because of infection, those who did not receive TXA, and those undergoing more complex TJA procedures may have greater odds of requiring ABT. We recommend preoperative optimization of the health of these patients to reduce the need for ABT.Level

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E404-E409
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors Associated With Perioperative Transfusion in Lower Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Under a Restrictive Blood Management Protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this