Factors affecting emergency preparedness competency of public health inspectors

A cross-sectional study in northeastern China

Ning Ning, Zheng Kang, Mingli Jiao, Yanhua Hao, Lijun Gao, Hong Sun, Qunhong Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the emergency preparedness competency specific to public health inspectors (PHIs), preparedness limitations and needs of the workforce, as well as to identify important factors that affect the preparedness competency of PHIs. Setting: Cross-sectional survey was conducted in Heilongjiang, a province in northeastern China. Participants: A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 368 PHIs from 17 public health inspection agencies, chosen by stratified cluster sampling strategy. 9 PHIs and 6 agency's leaders were invited to participate in an in-depth interview. Outcome measures: Self-rated preparedness competency in quantitative study was measured. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to test the associations between individual determinants and self-rated preparedness competency. Key themes relating to preparedness competency of PHIs in qualitative study were analysed. Results: Although 82% of PHIs highly rated their general preparedness competency, there were significant differences among the assessment on specific domains of their competency. Comparing with attitude, the domains of skills and knowledge tend to be lower (p=0.000). Awareness on one's own responsibilities regarding emergency response work was identified as the most important factor associated with preparedness competency (adjusted OR=6.33, 95% CI 3.30 to 12.16). Lack of explicit national job requirements, overlapping responsibilities and poor collaboration among agencies, together with poor knowledge and skills level of personnel, led to an ambiguity of responsibility, and hindered the preparedness competency enhancement of PHIs furthermore. Conclusions: Ambiguity responsibility in emergency response is still a prominent issue that hinders the further improvement on the preparedness competency for PHIs' in China. Intensified capacity-building activities targeting at individuals' weakness in specific knowledge and skills are urgently needed; in addition, capacity building at policy and system level as well as agency levels is of equal importance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere003832
JournalBMJ Open
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Civil Defense
China
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Capacity Building
Emergencies
Logistic Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Factors affecting emergency preparedness competency of public health inspectors : A cross-sectional study in northeastern China. / Ning, Ning; Kang, Zheng; Jiao, Mingli; Hao, Yanhua; Gao, Lijun; Sun, Hong; Wu, Qunhong.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 4, No. 1, e003832, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ning, Ning ; Kang, Zheng ; Jiao, Mingli ; Hao, Yanhua ; Gao, Lijun ; Sun, Hong ; Wu, Qunhong. / Factors affecting emergency preparedness competency of public health inspectors : A cross-sectional study in northeastern China. In: BMJ Open. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{254f6ab175a94e4ca257776861c1abbf,
title = "Factors affecting emergency preparedness competency of public health inspectors: A cross-sectional study in northeastern China",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the emergency preparedness competency specific to public health inspectors (PHIs), preparedness limitations and needs of the workforce, as well as to identify important factors that affect the preparedness competency of PHIs. Setting: Cross-sectional survey was conducted in Heilongjiang, a province in northeastern China. Participants: A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 368 PHIs from 17 public health inspection agencies, chosen by stratified cluster sampling strategy. 9 PHIs and 6 agency's leaders were invited to participate in an in-depth interview. Outcome measures: Self-rated preparedness competency in quantitative study was measured. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to test the associations between individual determinants and self-rated preparedness competency. Key themes relating to preparedness competency of PHIs in qualitative study were analysed. Results: Although 82{\%} of PHIs highly rated their general preparedness competency, there were significant differences among the assessment on specific domains of their competency. Comparing with attitude, the domains of skills and knowledge tend to be lower (p=0.000). Awareness on one's own responsibilities regarding emergency response work was identified as the most important factor associated with preparedness competency (adjusted OR=6.33, 95{\%} CI 3.30 to 12.16). Lack of explicit national job requirements, overlapping responsibilities and poor collaboration among agencies, together with poor knowledge and skills level of personnel, led to an ambiguity of responsibility, and hindered the preparedness competency enhancement of PHIs furthermore. Conclusions: Ambiguity responsibility in emergency response is still a prominent issue that hinders the further improvement on the preparedness competency for PHIs' in China. Intensified capacity-building activities targeting at individuals' weakness in specific knowledge and skills are urgently needed; in addition, capacity building at policy and system level as well as agency levels is of equal importance.",
author = "Ning Ning and Zheng Kang and Mingli Jiao and Yanhua Hao and Lijun Gao and Hong Sun and Qunhong Wu",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting emergency preparedness competency of public health inspectors

T2 - A cross-sectional study in northeastern China

AU - Ning, Ning

AU - Kang, Zheng

AU - Jiao, Mingli

AU - Hao, Yanhua

AU - Gao, Lijun

AU - Sun, Hong

AU - Wu, Qunhong

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: To determine the emergency preparedness competency specific to public health inspectors (PHIs), preparedness limitations and needs of the workforce, as well as to identify important factors that affect the preparedness competency of PHIs. Setting: Cross-sectional survey was conducted in Heilongjiang, a province in northeastern China. Participants: A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 368 PHIs from 17 public health inspection agencies, chosen by stratified cluster sampling strategy. 9 PHIs and 6 agency's leaders were invited to participate in an in-depth interview. Outcome measures: Self-rated preparedness competency in quantitative study was measured. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to test the associations between individual determinants and self-rated preparedness competency. Key themes relating to preparedness competency of PHIs in qualitative study were analysed. Results: Although 82% of PHIs highly rated their general preparedness competency, there were significant differences among the assessment on specific domains of their competency. Comparing with attitude, the domains of skills and knowledge tend to be lower (p=0.000). Awareness on one's own responsibilities regarding emergency response work was identified as the most important factor associated with preparedness competency (adjusted OR=6.33, 95% CI 3.30 to 12.16). Lack of explicit national job requirements, overlapping responsibilities and poor collaboration among agencies, together with poor knowledge and skills level of personnel, led to an ambiguity of responsibility, and hindered the preparedness competency enhancement of PHIs furthermore. Conclusions: Ambiguity responsibility in emergency response is still a prominent issue that hinders the further improvement on the preparedness competency for PHIs' in China. Intensified capacity-building activities targeting at individuals' weakness in specific knowledge and skills are urgently needed; in addition, capacity building at policy and system level as well as agency levels is of equal importance.

AB - Objectives: To determine the emergency preparedness competency specific to public health inspectors (PHIs), preparedness limitations and needs of the workforce, as well as to identify important factors that affect the preparedness competency of PHIs. Setting: Cross-sectional survey was conducted in Heilongjiang, a province in northeastern China. Participants: A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 368 PHIs from 17 public health inspection agencies, chosen by stratified cluster sampling strategy. 9 PHIs and 6 agency's leaders were invited to participate in an in-depth interview. Outcome measures: Self-rated preparedness competency in quantitative study was measured. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to test the associations between individual determinants and self-rated preparedness competency. Key themes relating to preparedness competency of PHIs in qualitative study were analysed. Results: Although 82% of PHIs highly rated their general preparedness competency, there were significant differences among the assessment on specific domains of their competency. Comparing with attitude, the domains of skills and knowledge tend to be lower (p=0.000). Awareness on one's own responsibilities regarding emergency response work was identified as the most important factor associated with preparedness competency (adjusted OR=6.33, 95% CI 3.30 to 12.16). Lack of explicit national job requirements, overlapping responsibilities and poor collaboration among agencies, together with poor knowledge and skills level of personnel, led to an ambiguity of responsibility, and hindered the preparedness competency enhancement of PHIs furthermore. Conclusions: Ambiguity responsibility in emergency response is still a prominent issue that hinders the further improvement on the preparedness competency for PHIs' in China. Intensified capacity-building activities targeting at individuals' weakness in specific knowledge and skills are urgently needed; in addition, capacity building at policy and system level as well as agency levels is of equal importance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892834651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892834651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003832

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003832

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 1

M1 - e003832

ER -