Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale

Aaron J. Kaat, Cristan A. Farmer, Kenneth D. Gadow, Robert L Findling, Oscar G. Bukstein, L. Eugene Arnold, Srihari S. Bangalore, Nora K. McNamara, Michael G. Aman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aggressive behaviors can be classified into proactive and reactive functions, though there is disagreement about whether these are distinct constructs. Data suggest that proactive and reactive aggression have different etiologies, correlates, and response to treatment. Several rating scales are available to characterize aggressive behavior as proactive or reactive; one commonly used scale was originally developed for teacher ratings, referred to here as the Antisocial Behavior Scale (ABS). However, no data are available on the psychometric properties of the ABS for parent ratings. This study examined the factor structure and convergent/divergent validity of the parent-rated ABS among 168 children aged 6–12 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, a disruptive behavior disorder, and severe aggression enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Multidimensional item response theory was used to confirm the original factor structure. The proactive and reactive factors were distinct but moderately correlated; the algorithm items exhibited acceptable fit on the original factors. The non-algorithm items caused theoretical problems and model misfit. Convergent and divergent validity of the scale was explored between the ABS and other parent-report measures. Proactive and reactive aggression showed differential correlates consistent with expectations for externalizing symptoms. The subscales were correlated weakly or not at all with most non-externalizing symptoms, with some exceptions. Thus, the original factor structure was supported and we found preliminary evidence for the validity of the scale, though the results suggest that the constructs measured by the ABS may not be totally distinct from general behavior problems in this clinical sample.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2734-2744
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Child and Family Studies
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

rating scale
Aggression
aggression
parents
aggressive behavior
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
behavior disorder
teacher rating
ADHD
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
etiology
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
psychometrics
Theoretical Models
Randomized Controlled Trials
rating
evidence

Keywords

  • Conduct disorder
  • Oppositional defiant disorder
  • Proactive aggression
  • Reactive aggression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Kaat, A. J., Farmer, C. A., Gadow, K. D., Findling, R. L., Bukstein, O. G., Arnold, L. E., ... Aman, M. G. (2014). Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(9), 2734-2744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0075-5

Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale. / Kaat, Aaron J.; Farmer, Cristan A.; Gadow, Kenneth D.; Findling, Robert L; Bukstein, Oscar G.; Arnold, L. Eugene; Bangalore, Srihari S.; McNamara, Nora K.; Aman, Michael G.

In: Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 24, No. 9, 27.11.2014, p. 2734-2744.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaat, AJ, Farmer, CA, Gadow, KD, Findling, RL, Bukstein, OG, Arnold, LE, Bangalore, SS, McNamara, NK & Aman, MG 2014, 'Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale', Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2734-2744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0075-5
Kaat, Aaron J. ; Farmer, Cristan A. ; Gadow, Kenneth D. ; Findling, Robert L ; Bukstein, Oscar G. ; Arnold, L. Eugene ; Bangalore, Srihari S. ; McNamara, Nora K. ; Aman, Michael G. / Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale. In: Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 2734-2744.
@article{3a31e6a76b8a4ecc984910e1289180fb,
title = "Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale",
abstract = "Aggressive behaviors can be classified into proactive and reactive functions, though there is disagreement about whether these are distinct constructs. Data suggest that proactive and reactive aggression have different etiologies, correlates, and response to treatment. Several rating scales are available to characterize aggressive behavior as proactive or reactive; one commonly used scale was originally developed for teacher ratings, referred to here as the Antisocial Behavior Scale (ABS). However, no data are available on the psychometric properties of the ABS for parent ratings. This study examined the factor structure and convergent/divergent validity of the parent-rated ABS among 168 children aged 6–12 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, a disruptive behavior disorder, and severe aggression enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Multidimensional item response theory was used to confirm the original factor structure. The proactive and reactive factors were distinct but moderately correlated; the algorithm items exhibited acceptable fit on the original factors. The non-algorithm items caused theoretical problems and model misfit. Convergent and divergent validity of the scale was explored between the ABS and other parent-report measures. Proactive and reactive aggression showed differential correlates consistent with expectations for externalizing symptoms. The subscales were correlated weakly or not at all with most non-externalizing symptoms, with some exceptions. Thus, the original factor structure was supported and we found preliminary evidence for the validity of the scale, though the results suggest that the constructs measured by the ABS may not be totally distinct from general behavior problems in this clinical sample.",
keywords = "Conduct disorder, Oppositional defiant disorder, Proactive aggression, Reactive aggression",
author = "Kaat, {Aaron J.} and Farmer, {Cristan A.} and Gadow, {Kenneth D.} and Findling, {Robert L} and Bukstein, {Oscar G.} and Arnold, {L. Eugene} and Bangalore, {Srihari S.} and McNamara, {Nora K.} and Aman, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1007/s10826-014-0075-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2734--2744",
journal = "Journal of Child and Family Studies",
issn = "1062-1024",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factor Validity of a Proactive and Reactive Aggression Rating Scale

AU - Kaat, Aaron J.

AU - Farmer, Cristan A.

AU - Gadow, Kenneth D.

AU - Findling, Robert L

AU - Bukstein, Oscar G.

AU - Arnold, L. Eugene

AU - Bangalore, Srihari S.

AU - McNamara, Nora K.

AU - Aman, Michael G.

PY - 2014/11/27

Y1 - 2014/11/27

N2 - Aggressive behaviors can be classified into proactive and reactive functions, though there is disagreement about whether these are distinct constructs. Data suggest that proactive and reactive aggression have different etiologies, correlates, and response to treatment. Several rating scales are available to characterize aggressive behavior as proactive or reactive; one commonly used scale was originally developed for teacher ratings, referred to here as the Antisocial Behavior Scale (ABS). However, no data are available on the psychometric properties of the ABS for parent ratings. This study examined the factor structure and convergent/divergent validity of the parent-rated ABS among 168 children aged 6–12 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, a disruptive behavior disorder, and severe aggression enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Multidimensional item response theory was used to confirm the original factor structure. The proactive and reactive factors were distinct but moderately correlated; the algorithm items exhibited acceptable fit on the original factors. The non-algorithm items caused theoretical problems and model misfit. Convergent and divergent validity of the scale was explored between the ABS and other parent-report measures. Proactive and reactive aggression showed differential correlates consistent with expectations for externalizing symptoms. The subscales were correlated weakly or not at all with most non-externalizing symptoms, with some exceptions. Thus, the original factor structure was supported and we found preliminary evidence for the validity of the scale, though the results suggest that the constructs measured by the ABS may not be totally distinct from general behavior problems in this clinical sample.

AB - Aggressive behaviors can be classified into proactive and reactive functions, though there is disagreement about whether these are distinct constructs. Data suggest that proactive and reactive aggression have different etiologies, correlates, and response to treatment. Several rating scales are available to characterize aggressive behavior as proactive or reactive; one commonly used scale was originally developed for teacher ratings, referred to here as the Antisocial Behavior Scale (ABS). However, no data are available on the psychometric properties of the ABS for parent ratings. This study examined the factor structure and convergent/divergent validity of the parent-rated ABS among 168 children aged 6–12 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, a disruptive behavior disorder, and severe aggression enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Multidimensional item response theory was used to confirm the original factor structure. The proactive and reactive factors were distinct but moderately correlated; the algorithm items exhibited acceptable fit on the original factors. The non-algorithm items caused theoretical problems and model misfit. Convergent and divergent validity of the scale was explored between the ABS and other parent-report measures. Proactive and reactive aggression showed differential correlates consistent with expectations for externalizing symptoms. The subscales were correlated weakly or not at all with most non-externalizing symptoms, with some exceptions. Thus, the original factor structure was supported and we found preliminary evidence for the validity of the scale, though the results suggest that the constructs measured by the ABS may not be totally distinct from general behavior problems in this clinical sample.

KW - Conduct disorder

KW - Oppositional defiant disorder

KW - Proactive aggression

KW - Reactive aggression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938966218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938966218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10826-014-0075-5

DO - 10.1007/s10826-014-0075-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 26504369

AN - SCOPUS:84938966218

VL - 24

SP - 2734

EP - 2744

JO - Journal of Child and Family Studies

JF - Journal of Child and Family Studies

SN - 1062-1024

IS - 9

ER -