Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables

Jean M. Williams, Gerald J. Jerome, Laura J. Kenow, Tracie Rogers, Tessa A. Sartain, Greg Darland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Little research exists to identify optimal coaching behaviors and factors that influence the effectiveness of particular behaviors. The present study tested 484 athletes in order to determine sub-scales on the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ). The CBQ measures athletes' perceptions of coaching behaviors and evaluates their effectiveness in helping athletes play better and maintain optimal mental states and focus. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model (negative activation, supportiveness/emotional composure) derived from an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Correlational analyses indicated that athletes with higher anxiety and lower self-confidence and compatibility with the coach were more likely to negatively evaluate coaching behaviors. The results support and expand on Smoll and Smith's (1989) model of leadership behaviors in sport.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-34
Number of pages19
JournalSport Psychologist
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Athletes
Statistical Factor Analysis
Mentoring
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sports
Anxiety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Williams, J. M., Jerome, G. J., Kenow, L. J., Rogers, T., Sartain, T. A., & Darland, G. (2003). Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables. Sport Psychologist, 17(1), 16-34.

Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables. / Williams, Jean M.; Jerome, Gerald J.; Kenow, Laura J.; Rogers, Tracie; Sartain, Tessa A.; Darland, Greg.

In: Sport Psychologist, Vol. 17, No. 1, 03.2003, p. 16-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, JM, Jerome, GJ, Kenow, LJ, Rogers, T, Sartain, TA & Darland, G 2003, 'Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables', Sport Psychologist, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 16-34.
Williams JM, Jerome GJ, Kenow LJ, Rogers T, Sartain TA, Darland G. Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables. Sport Psychologist. 2003 Mar;17(1):16-34.
Williams, Jean M. ; Jerome, Gerald J. ; Kenow, Laura J. ; Rogers, Tracie ; Sartain, Tessa A. ; Darland, Greg. / Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables. In: Sport Psychologist. 2003 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 16-34.
@article{d4d42d5afa16472386fbd5eb4f919d15,
title = "Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables",
abstract = "Little research exists to identify optimal coaching behaviors and factors that influence the effectiveness of particular behaviors. The present study tested 484 athletes in order to determine sub-scales on the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ). The CBQ measures athletes' perceptions of coaching behaviors and evaluates their effectiveness in helping athletes play better and maintain optimal mental states and focus. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model (negative activation, supportiveness/emotional composure) derived from an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Correlational analyses indicated that athletes with higher anxiety and lower self-confidence and compatibility with the coach were more likely to negatively evaluate coaching behaviors. The results support and expand on Smoll and Smith's (1989) model of leadership behaviors in sport.",
author = "Williams, {Jean M.} and Jerome, {Gerald J.} and Kenow, {Laura J.} and Tracie Rogers and Sartain, {Tessa A.} and Greg Darland",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "16--34",
journal = "Sport Psychologist",
issn = "0888-4781",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables

AU - Williams, Jean M.

AU - Jerome, Gerald J.

AU - Kenow, Laura J.

AU - Rogers, Tracie

AU - Sartain, Tessa A.

AU - Darland, Greg

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - Little research exists to identify optimal coaching behaviors and factors that influence the effectiveness of particular behaviors. The present study tested 484 athletes in order to determine sub-scales on the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ). The CBQ measures athletes' perceptions of coaching behaviors and evaluates their effectiveness in helping athletes play better and maintain optimal mental states and focus. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model (negative activation, supportiveness/emotional composure) derived from an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Correlational analyses indicated that athletes with higher anxiety and lower self-confidence and compatibility with the coach were more likely to negatively evaluate coaching behaviors. The results support and expand on Smoll and Smith's (1989) model of leadership behaviors in sport.

AB - Little research exists to identify optimal coaching behaviors and factors that influence the effectiveness of particular behaviors. The present study tested 484 athletes in order to determine sub-scales on the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ). The CBQ measures athletes' perceptions of coaching behaviors and evaluates their effectiveness in helping athletes play better and maintain optimal mental states and focus. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model (negative activation, supportiveness/emotional composure) derived from an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Correlational analyses indicated that athletes with higher anxiety and lower self-confidence and compatibility with the coach were more likely to negatively evaluate coaching behaviors. The results support and expand on Smoll and Smith's (1989) model of leadership behaviors in sport.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042674198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042674198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 16

EP - 34

JO - Sport Psychologist

JF - Sport Psychologist

SN - 0888-4781

IS - 1

ER -