Facing the malpractice crisis: Academic physicians' willingness to accept quick fix solutions

Rachel B. Levine, Steven J. Kravet, Darcy A. Reed, Donna M. Windish, Leah Wolfe, Scott M. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the willingness of academic physicians to accept strategies to contain institutional malpractice costs. METHODS: We surveyed all 270 Department of Medicine physicians at a large academic center. Respondents were asked about their knowledge regarding malpractice premiums, willingness to reduce patient-care activities and accept decreases in compensation. RESULTS: The response rate was 80%. Respondents estimated the annual increase in malpractice premiums from 2004 to 2005 to be 29%. The true increase was 28% (P = 0.55). Almost all opposed eliminating patient care (95%) or providing patient care every other year at double effort and withdrawing from patient care on alternate years (97%). Seventy percent would limit their clinical procedures. Most physicians opposed salary reduction (97%) or decreases in fringe benefits (99%). CONCLUSIONS: Few academic physicians are willing to limit patient care or accept decreases in compensation to recoup institutional malpractice costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1334-1336
Number of pages3
JournalSouthern medical journal
Volume99
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Keywords

  • Academic medical centers
  • Medical malpractice
  • Physician compensation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facing the malpractice crisis: Academic physicians' willingness to accept quick fix solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this