Extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia following orbital fracture repair

H. A. Shah, Taha Shipchandler, Dominic Vernon, Maraya Baumanis, David Chan, William R. Nunery, Hui Bae Harold Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose To report a series of patients with extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia after orbital fracture repair, and determine the effect of timing of repair and the type of implant used. Methods A chart review was conducted identifying all patients > 18 years of age at our institution between June 2005 and June 2008 who underwent orbital fracture repair, and presented with clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction persisting longer than one month after repair. Data collected included timing of repair, implant used within the orbit, and need for revision. Results Ten patients were identified with a mean time to primary orbital fracture repair at 9 days (range 1–48). Seven patients underwent revision of their orbital fracture repair with removal of the previously placed implant and replacement with non-porous 0.4 mm Supramid Foil, whereas one patient underwent lateral and inferior rectus recessions without revision of primary fracture repair. Titanium mesh was the intra-orbital implant found in all patients requiring revision of orbital fracture repair. All revisions resulted in resolution of clinically significant diplopia. Conclusions Clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction is not an uncommon complication after orbital fracture repair. In our series, there was a strong association between these complications and the use of porous titanium mesh implants. Revision of fractures significantly improved diplopia in all but one patient. This suggests that meticulous fracture repair and the use of non-porous implants primarily or secondarily may preclude the need for strabismus surgery after orbital trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-36
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Orbital Fractures
Diplopia
Eye Movements
Titanium
Orbital Implants
Strabismus
Nylons
Orbit
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia following orbital fracture repair. / Shah, H. A.; Shipchandler, Taha; Vernon, Dominic; Baumanis, Maraya; Chan, David; Nunery, William R.; Lee, Hui Bae Harold.

In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 34-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shah, H. A. ; Shipchandler, Taha ; Vernon, Dominic ; Baumanis, Maraya ; Chan, David ; Nunery, William R. ; Lee, Hui Bae Harold. / Extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia following orbital fracture repair. In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 34-36.
@article{17444071db564973ba7c23de5879fc59,
title = "Extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia following orbital fracture repair",
abstract = "Purpose To report a series of patients with extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia after orbital fracture repair, and determine the effect of timing of repair and the type of implant used. Methods A chart review was conducted identifying all patients > 18 years of age at our institution between June 2005 and June 2008 who underwent orbital fracture repair, and presented with clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction persisting longer than one month after repair. Data collected included timing of repair, implant used within the orbit, and need for revision. Results Ten patients were identified with a mean time to primary orbital fracture repair at 9 days (range 1–48). Seven patients underwent revision of their orbital fracture repair with removal of the previously placed implant and replacement with non-porous 0.4 mm Supramid Foil, whereas one patient underwent lateral and inferior rectus recessions without revision of primary fracture repair. Titanium mesh was the intra-orbital implant found in all patients requiring revision of orbital fracture repair. All revisions resulted in resolution of clinically significant diplopia. Conclusions Clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction is not an uncommon complication after orbital fracture repair. In our series, there was a strong association between these complications and the use of porous titanium mesh implants. Revision of fractures significantly improved diplopia in all but one patient. This suggests that meticulous fracture repair and the use of non-porous implants primarily or secondarily may preclude the need for strabismus surgery after orbital trauma.",
author = "Shah, {H. A.} and Taha Shipchandler and Dominic Vernon and Maraya Baumanis and David Chan and Nunery, {William R.} and Lee, {Hui Bae Harold}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "34--36",
journal = "American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery",
issn = "0196-0709",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia following orbital fracture repair

AU - Shah, H. A.

AU - Shipchandler, Taha

AU - Vernon, Dominic

AU - Baumanis, Maraya

AU - Chan, David

AU - Nunery, William R.

AU - Lee, Hui Bae Harold

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose To report a series of patients with extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia after orbital fracture repair, and determine the effect of timing of repair and the type of implant used. Methods A chart review was conducted identifying all patients > 18 years of age at our institution between June 2005 and June 2008 who underwent orbital fracture repair, and presented with clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction persisting longer than one month after repair. Data collected included timing of repair, implant used within the orbit, and need for revision. Results Ten patients were identified with a mean time to primary orbital fracture repair at 9 days (range 1–48). Seven patients underwent revision of their orbital fracture repair with removal of the previously placed implant and replacement with non-porous 0.4 mm Supramid Foil, whereas one patient underwent lateral and inferior rectus recessions without revision of primary fracture repair. Titanium mesh was the intra-orbital implant found in all patients requiring revision of orbital fracture repair. All revisions resulted in resolution of clinically significant diplopia. Conclusions Clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction is not an uncommon complication after orbital fracture repair. In our series, there was a strong association between these complications and the use of porous titanium mesh implants. Revision of fractures significantly improved diplopia in all but one patient. This suggests that meticulous fracture repair and the use of non-porous implants primarily or secondarily may preclude the need for strabismus surgery after orbital trauma.

AB - Purpose To report a series of patients with extra-ocular movement restriction and diplopia after orbital fracture repair, and determine the effect of timing of repair and the type of implant used. Methods A chart review was conducted identifying all patients > 18 years of age at our institution between June 2005 and June 2008 who underwent orbital fracture repair, and presented with clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction persisting longer than one month after repair. Data collected included timing of repair, implant used within the orbit, and need for revision. Results Ten patients were identified with a mean time to primary orbital fracture repair at 9 days (range 1–48). Seven patients underwent revision of their orbital fracture repair with removal of the previously placed implant and replacement with non-porous 0.4 mm Supramid Foil, whereas one patient underwent lateral and inferior rectus recessions without revision of primary fracture repair. Titanium mesh was the intra-orbital implant found in all patients requiring revision of orbital fracture repair. All revisions resulted in resolution of clinically significant diplopia. Conclusions Clinically significant diplopia and extra-ocular movement restriction is not an uncommon complication after orbital fracture repair. In our series, there was a strong association between these complications and the use of porous titanium mesh implants. Revision of fractures significantly improved diplopia in all but one patient. This suggests that meticulous fracture repair and the use of non-porous implants primarily or secondarily may preclude the need for strabismus surgery after orbital trauma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030161617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030161617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.08.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 28969869

AN - SCOPUS:85030161617

VL - 39

SP - 34

EP - 36

JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

SN - 0196-0709

IS - 1

ER -