External validation of the national healthcare safety network risk models for surgical site infections in total hip and knee replacements

Laura Lewallen, Hilal Maradit Kremers, Brian D. Lahr, Tad M. Mabry, James M. Steckelberg, Daniel J. Berry, Arlen D. Hanssen, Elie F. Berbari, Douglas R. Osmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network surgical site infections risk models for hip (HPRO) and knee (KPRO) replacement are intended for case-mix adjustment when reporting surgical site infection rates across institutions, but they are not validated in external data sets.

Objective: To evaluate the validity of HPRO and KPRO risk models and improvement in risk prediction with inclusion of information on morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Patients: A single-center cohort of 21,941 hip and knee replacement procedures performed between 2002 and 2009.

Methods: Discriminative ability was assessed using the concordance statistic (C statistic). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests.

Results: The discrimination of HPRO was good, with a C statistic of 0.695 for surgical site infections and 0.749 for prosthetic joint infections. The discrimination of KPRO was worse than that of HPRO, with a C statistic of 0.592 for surgical site infections and 0.675 for prosthetic joint infections. Adding morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus to the HPRO and KPRO risk models modestly improved discrimination. There was no significant evidence of miscalibration based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, but calibration of HPRO models appeared to be better than that of the KPRO models.

Conclusions: HPRO performed better than the KPRO in predicting surgical site infections after hip and knee replacements. Both fared well in predicting prosthetic joint infections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1323-1329
Number of pages7
JournalInfection control and hospital epidemiology
Volume35
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Hip Replacement Arthroplasties
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Hip
Knee
Morbid Obesity
Joints
Calibration
Diabetes Mellitus
Infection
Risk Adjustment
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

External validation of the national healthcare safety network risk models for surgical site infections in total hip and knee replacements. / Lewallen, Laura; Kremers, Hilal Maradit; Lahr, Brian D.; Mabry, Tad M.; Steckelberg, James M.; Berry, Daniel J.; Hanssen, Arlen D.; Berbari, Elie F.; Osmon, Douglas R.

In: Infection control and hospital epidemiology, Vol. 35, No. 11, 01.11.2014, p. 1323-1329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewallen, Laura ; Kremers, Hilal Maradit ; Lahr, Brian D. ; Mabry, Tad M. ; Steckelberg, James M. ; Berry, Daniel J. ; Hanssen, Arlen D. ; Berbari, Elie F. ; Osmon, Douglas R. / External validation of the national healthcare safety network risk models for surgical site infections in total hip and knee replacements. In: Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 11. pp. 1323-1329.
@article{32239f2ee1bc47e79955cac31ec9cf00,
title = "External validation of the national healthcare safety network risk models for surgical site infections in total hip and knee replacements",
abstract = "Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network surgical site infections risk models for hip (HPRO) and knee (KPRO) replacement are intended for case-mix adjustment when reporting surgical site infection rates across institutions, but they are not validated in external data sets.Objective: To evaluate the validity of HPRO and KPRO risk models and improvement in risk prediction with inclusion of information on morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Patients: A single-center cohort of 21,941 hip and knee replacement procedures performed between 2002 and 2009.Methods: Discriminative ability was assessed using the concordance statistic (C statistic). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests.Results: The discrimination of HPRO was good, with a C statistic of 0.695 for surgical site infections and 0.749 for prosthetic joint infections. The discrimination of KPRO was worse than that of HPRO, with a C statistic of 0.592 for surgical site infections and 0.675 for prosthetic joint infections. Adding morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus to the HPRO and KPRO risk models modestly improved discrimination. There was no significant evidence of miscalibration based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, but calibration of HPRO models appeared to be better than that of the KPRO models.Conclusions: HPRO performed better than the KPRO in predicting surgical site infections after hip and knee replacements. Both fared well in predicting prosthetic joint infections.",
author = "Laura Lewallen and Kremers, {Hilal Maradit} and Lahr, {Brian D.} and Mabry, {Tad M.} and Steckelberg, {James M.} and Berry, {Daniel J.} and Hanssen, {Arlen D.} and Berbari, {Elie F.} and Osmon, {Douglas R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/678412",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1323--1329",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External validation of the national healthcare safety network risk models for surgical site infections in total hip and knee replacements

AU - Lewallen, Laura

AU - Kremers, Hilal Maradit

AU - Lahr, Brian D.

AU - Mabry, Tad M.

AU - Steckelberg, James M.

AU - Berry, Daniel J.

AU - Hanssen, Arlen D.

AU - Berbari, Elie F.

AU - Osmon, Douglas R.

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network surgical site infections risk models for hip (HPRO) and knee (KPRO) replacement are intended for case-mix adjustment when reporting surgical site infection rates across institutions, but they are not validated in external data sets.Objective: To evaluate the validity of HPRO and KPRO risk models and improvement in risk prediction with inclusion of information on morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Patients: A single-center cohort of 21,941 hip and knee replacement procedures performed between 2002 and 2009.Methods: Discriminative ability was assessed using the concordance statistic (C statistic). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests.Results: The discrimination of HPRO was good, with a C statistic of 0.695 for surgical site infections and 0.749 for prosthetic joint infections. The discrimination of KPRO was worse than that of HPRO, with a C statistic of 0.592 for surgical site infections and 0.675 for prosthetic joint infections. Adding morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus to the HPRO and KPRO risk models modestly improved discrimination. There was no significant evidence of miscalibration based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, but calibration of HPRO models appeared to be better than that of the KPRO models.Conclusions: HPRO performed better than the KPRO in predicting surgical site infections after hip and knee replacements. Both fared well in predicting prosthetic joint infections.

AB - Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network surgical site infections risk models for hip (HPRO) and knee (KPRO) replacement are intended for case-mix adjustment when reporting surgical site infection rates across institutions, but they are not validated in external data sets.Objective: To evaluate the validity of HPRO and KPRO risk models and improvement in risk prediction with inclusion of information on morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Patients: A single-center cohort of 21,941 hip and knee replacement procedures performed between 2002 and 2009.Methods: Discriminative ability was assessed using the concordance statistic (C statistic). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests.Results: The discrimination of HPRO was good, with a C statistic of 0.695 for surgical site infections and 0.749 for prosthetic joint infections. The discrimination of KPRO was worse than that of HPRO, with a C statistic of 0.592 for surgical site infections and 0.675 for prosthetic joint infections. Adding morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus to the HPRO and KPRO risk models modestly improved discrimination. There was no significant evidence of miscalibration based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, but calibration of HPRO models appeared to be better than that of the KPRO models.Conclusions: HPRO performed better than the KPRO in predicting surgical site infections after hip and knee replacements. Both fared well in predicting prosthetic joint infections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908317322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908317322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/678412

DO - 10.1086/678412

M3 - Article

C2 - 25333425

AN - SCOPUS:84908317322

VL - 35

SP - 1323

EP - 1329

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

IS - 11

ER -