TY - JOUR
T1 - External Validation of and Factors Associated with the Overuse Index
T2 - a Nationwide Population-Based Study from Taiwan
AU - Tung, Yu Chi
AU - Li, Guo Hong
AU - Chang, Hsien Yen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: The Overuse Index (OI), previously called the Johns Hopkins Overuse Index, is developed and validated as a composite measure of systematic overuse/low-value care using United States claims data. However, no information is available concerning whether the external validation of the OI is sustained, especially for international application. Moreover, little is known about which supply and demand factors are associated with the OI. Objective: We used nationwide population-based data from Taiwan to externally validate the OI and to examine the association of regional healthcare resources and socioeconomic factors with the OI. Design and Participants: We analyzed 1,994,636 beneficiaries randomly selected from all people enrolled in the Taiwan National Health Insurance in 2013. Main Measures: The OI was calculated for 2013 to 2015 for each of 50 medical regions. Spearman correlation analysis was applied to examine the association of the OI with total medical costs per capita and mortality rate. Generalized estimating equation linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of regional healthcare resources (number of hospital beds per 1000 population, number of physicians per 1000 population, and proportion of primary care physicians [PCPs]) and socioeconomic factors (proportion of low-income people and proportion of population aged 20 and older without a high school diploma) with the OI. Results: Higher scores of the OI were associated with higher total medical costs per capita (ρ = 0.48, P < 0.001) and not associated with total mortality (ρ = − 0.01, P = 0.882). Higher proportions of PCPs and higher proportions of low-income people were associated with lower scores of the OI (β = − 0.022, P = 0.016 and β = − 0.224, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Our study supported the external validation of the OI by demonstrating a similar association within a universal healthcare system, and it showed the association of a higher proportion of PCPs and a higher proportion of low-income people with less overuse/low-value care.
AB - Background: The Overuse Index (OI), previously called the Johns Hopkins Overuse Index, is developed and validated as a composite measure of systematic overuse/low-value care using United States claims data. However, no information is available concerning whether the external validation of the OI is sustained, especially for international application. Moreover, little is known about which supply and demand factors are associated with the OI. Objective: We used nationwide population-based data from Taiwan to externally validate the OI and to examine the association of regional healthcare resources and socioeconomic factors with the OI. Design and Participants: We analyzed 1,994,636 beneficiaries randomly selected from all people enrolled in the Taiwan National Health Insurance in 2013. Main Measures: The OI was calculated for 2013 to 2015 for each of 50 medical regions. Spearman correlation analysis was applied to examine the association of the OI with total medical costs per capita and mortality rate. Generalized estimating equation linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of regional healthcare resources (number of hospital beds per 1000 population, number of physicians per 1000 population, and proportion of primary care physicians [PCPs]) and socioeconomic factors (proportion of low-income people and proportion of population aged 20 and older without a high school diploma) with the OI. Results: Higher scores of the OI were associated with higher total medical costs per capita (ρ = 0.48, P < 0.001) and not associated with total mortality (ρ = − 0.01, P = 0.882). Higher proportions of PCPs and higher proportions of low-income people were associated with lower scores of the OI (β = − 0.022, P = 0.016 and β = − 0.224, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Our study supported the external validation of the OI by demonstrating a similar association within a universal healthcare system, and it showed the association of a higher proportion of PCPs and a higher proportion of low-income people with less overuse/low-value care.
KW - low-value care
KW - measurement
KW - overuse
KW - regional variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100964428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100964428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-020-06293-0
DO - 10.1007/s11606-020-06293-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 33063201
AN - SCOPUS:85100964428
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 36
SP - 438
EP - 446
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 2
ER -