Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism: Evidence from Greek

Valantis Fyndanis, Spyridoula Varlokosta, Kyrana Tsapkini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates the ability of three Greek-speaking agrammatic patients to produce and comprehend wh-questions by means of a wh-question elicitation task and a picture-pointing task. The role of question type is explored by comparing argument with adjunct questions and subject with object questions. Overall, production was found significantly more impaired than comprehension. The agrammatic participants had better performance on argument than on adjunct questions, while no dissociation was observed between subject and object questions. The overall difficulty with wh-questions indicates that the agrammatic participants had a deficit in syntactic movement or in handling CP, a finding which is compatible with other cross-linguistic results. Although this finding could be accounted for by existing hypotheses, an alternative account is proposed, according to which wh-questions are difficult to process because they are associated with LF-interpretable features, which increase their processing load. Finally, the preponderance of argument over adjunct questions reinforces the (double) dissociation between these two question types reported in the literature, while the lack of a dissociation between the subject- and the object-questions suggests that both question types involve syntactic movement to CP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)644-662
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Dissociative Disorders
Broca Aphasia
Aptitude
Linguistics
evidence
speaking
deficit
comprehension
linguistics
lack
ability
performance
Agrammatism
Wh-questions
Adjunct
Question Types
Syntactic Movement
Dissociation

Keywords

  • Adjunct
  • Agrammatism
  • Argument
  • Greek
  • Movement
  • Wh-questions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism : Evidence from Greek. / Fyndanis, Valantis; Varlokosta, Spyridoula; Tsapkini, Kyrana.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 23, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 644-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fyndanis, Valantis ; Varlokosta, Spyridoula ; Tsapkini, Kyrana. / Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism : Evidence from Greek. In: Journal of Neurolinguistics. 2010 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 644-662.
@article{0972db603db7443190878a4f81a4d2da,
title = "Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism: Evidence from Greek",
abstract = "This study investigates the ability of three Greek-speaking agrammatic patients to produce and comprehend wh-questions by means of a wh-question elicitation task and a picture-pointing task. The role of question type is explored by comparing argument with adjunct questions and subject with object questions. Overall, production was found significantly more impaired than comprehension. The agrammatic participants had better performance on argument than on adjunct questions, while no dissociation was observed between subject and object questions. The overall difficulty with wh-questions indicates that the agrammatic participants had a deficit in syntactic movement or in handling CP, a finding which is compatible with other cross-linguistic results. Although this finding could be accounted for by existing hypotheses, an alternative account is proposed, according to which wh-questions are difficult to process because they are associated with LF-interpretable features, which increase their processing load. Finally, the preponderance of argument over adjunct questions reinforces the (double) dissociation between these two question types reported in the literature, while the lack of a dissociation between the subject- and the object-questions suggests that both question types involve syntactic movement to CP.",
keywords = "Adjunct, Agrammatism, Argument, Greek, Movement, Wh-questions",
author = "Valantis Fyndanis and Spyridoula Varlokosta and Kyrana Tsapkini",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "644--662",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism

T2 - Evidence from Greek

AU - Fyndanis, Valantis

AU - Varlokosta, Spyridoula

AU - Tsapkini, Kyrana

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - This study investigates the ability of three Greek-speaking agrammatic patients to produce and comprehend wh-questions by means of a wh-question elicitation task and a picture-pointing task. The role of question type is explored by comparing argument with adjunct questions and subject with object questions. Overall, production was found significantly more impaired than comprehension. The agrammatic participants had better performance on argument than on adjunct questions, while no dissociation was observed between subject and object questions. The overall difficulty with wh-questions indicates that the agrammatic participants had a deficit in syntactic movement or in handling CP, a finding which is compatible with other cross-linguistic results. Although this finding could be accounted for by existing hypotheses, an alternative account is proposed, according to which wh-questions are difficult to process because they are associated with LF-interpretable features, which increase their processing load. Finally, the preponderance of argument over adjunct questions reinforces the (double) dissociation between these two question types reported in the literature, while the lack of a dissociation between the subject- and the object-questions suggests that both question types involve syntactic movement to CP.

AB - This study investigates the ability of three Greek-speaking agrammatic patients to produce and comprehend wh-questions by means of a wh-question elicitation task and a picture-pointing task. The role of question type is explored by comparing argument with adjunct questions and subject with object questions. Overall, production was found significantly more impaired than comprehension. The agrammatic participants had better performance on argument than on adjunct questions, while no dissociation was observed between subject and object questions. The overall difficulty with wh-questions indicates that the agrammatic participants had a deficit in syntactic movement or in handling CP, a finding which is compatible with other cross-linguistic results. Although this finding could be accounted for by existing hypotheses, an alternative account is proposed, according to which wh-questions are difficult to process because they are associated with LF-interpretable features, which increase their processing load. Finally, the preponderance of argument over adjunct questions reinforces the (double) dissociation between these two question types reported in the literature, while the lack of a dissociation between the subject- and the object-questions suggests that both question types involve syntactic movement to CP.

KW - Adjunct

KW - Agrammatism

KW - Argument

KW - Greek

KW - Movement

KW - Wh-questions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955552932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955552932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.06.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955552932

VL - 23

SP - 644

EP - 662

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

IS - 6

ER -