Exploring the hierarchy of mobility performance in high-functioning older women

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Preventing mobility disability depends on matching interventions to individual needs. The purpose of this study is to improve targeting by determining whether mobility performance is associated with, and predicts, mobility disability hierarchically. The hypothesis is that poorer performance tested by more demanding tasks is more strongly associated with current and future mobility "limitation" (self-reported task modification or difficulty) than is that tested by less demanding tasks, in a graded manner. Methods. Data come from the Women's Health and Aging Study II (n = 436) at baseline and at 36-month follow-up. Logistic and multinomial regression models examined associations between performance on mobility tests and reported limitation in walking one-half mile, adjusting for risk factors for disability. Results. We found that 76.6% of prevalent and 88.4% of new-onset self-reported limitation fit within the hypothesized hierarchical pattern. The estimated strength of association between a decrement in lower extremity performance and reported limitation increased with task demand for the primary outcome, reported limitation in walking one-half mile. For example, the odds ratios for prevalent report of walking limitation, versus no limitation, for 10% lower performance walking, dressing, repeating chair stands, and climbing, respectively, were 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.17), 1.08 (1.00-1.16), 1.15 (1.06-1.25), and 1.22 (1.12-1.33). Conclusions. This study partially supports the hypothesis that mobility performance tends to follow a hierarchical pattern. For studying mild mobility disability, walking speed may not be as useful as more demanding tests. Identifying declines in performance through more demanding tests such as climbing should improve the ability to target preventive interventions to individuals at risk of mild mobility decline within a high-functioning population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Volume62
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Walking
Mobility Limitation
Women's Health
Bandages
Lower Extremity
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

@article{183b972fd8784025955cf334b6c5cd13,
title = "Exploring the hierarchy of mobility performance in high-functioning older women",
abstract = "Background. Preventing mobility disability depends on matching interventions to individual needs. The purpose of this study is to improve targeting by determining whether mobility performance is associated with, and predicts, mobility disability hierarchically. The hypothesis is that poorer performance tested by more demanding tasks is more strongly associated with current and future mobility {"}limitation{"} (self-reported task modification or difficulty) than is that tested by less demanding tasks, in a graded manner. Methods. Data come from the Women's Health and Aging Study II (n = 436) at baseline and at 36-month follow-up. Logistic and multinomial regression models examined associations between performance on mobility tests and reported limitation in walking one-half mile, adjusting for risk factors for disability. Results. We found that 76.6{\%} of prevalent and 88.4{\%} of new-onset self-reported limitation fit within the hypothesized hierarchical pattern. The estimated strength of association between a decrement in lower extremity performance and reported limitation increased with task demand for the primary outcome, reported limitation in walking one-half mile. For example, the odds ratios for prevalent report of walking limitation, versus no limitation, for 10{\%} lower performance walking, dressing, repeating chair stands, and climbing, respectively, were 1.05 (95{\%} confidence interval, 0.97-1.17), 1.08 (1.00-1.16), 1.15 (1.06-1.25), and 1.22 (1.12-1.33). Conclusions. This study partially supports the hypothesis that mobility performance tends to follow a hierarchical pattern. For studying mild mobility disability, walking speed may not be as useful as more demanding tests. Identifying declines in performance through more demanding tests such as climbing should improve the ability to target preventive interventions to individuals at risk of mild mobility decline within a high-functioning population.",
author = "Weiss, {Carlos Orval} and Fried, {Linda P} and {Bandeen Roche}, {Karen J}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "167--173",
journal = "Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences",
issn = "1079-5006",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the hierarchy of mobility performance in high-functioning older women

AU - Weiss, Carlos Orval

AU - Fried, Linda P

AU - Bandeen Roche, Karen J

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Background. Preventing mobility disability depends on matching interventions to individual needs. The purpose of this study is to improve targeting by determining whether mobility performance is associated with, and predicts, mobility disability hierarchically. The hypothesis is that poorer performance tested by more demanding tasks is more strongly associated with current and future mobility "limitation" (self-reported task modification or difficulty) than is that tested by less demanding tasks, in a graded manner. Methods. Data come from the Women's Health and Aging Study II (n = 436) at baseline and at 36-month follow-up. Logistic and multinomial regression models examined associations between performance on mobility tests and reported limitation in walking one-half mile, adjusting for risk factors for disability. Results. We found that 76.6% of prevalent and 88.4% of new-onset self-reported limitation fit within the hypothesized hierarchical pattern. The estimated strength of association between a decrement in lower extremity performance and reported limitation increased with task demand for the primary outcome, reported limitation in walking one-half mile. For example, the odds ratios for prevalent report of walking limitation, versus no limitation, for 10% lower performance walking, dressing, repeating chair stands, and climbing, respectively, were 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.17), 1.08 (1.00-1.16), 1.15 (1.06-1.25), and 1.22 (1.12-1.33). Conclusions. This study partially supports the hypothesis that mobility performance tends to follow a hierarchical pattern. For studying mild mobility disability, walking speed may not be as useful as more demanding tests. Identifying declines in performance through more demanding tests such as climbing should improve the ability to target preventive interventions to individuals at risk of mild mobility decline within a high-functioning population.

AB - Background. Preventing mobility disability depends on matching interventions to individual needs. The purpose of this study is to improve targeting by determining whether mobility performance is associated with, and predicts, mobility disability hierarchically. The hypothesis is that poorer performance tested by more demanding tasks is more strongly associated with current and future mobility "limitation" (self-reported task modification or difficulty) than is that tested by less demanding tasks, in a graded manner. Methods. Data come from the Women's Health and Aging Study II (n = 436) at baseline and at 36-month follow-up. Logistic and multinomial regression models examined associations between performance on mobility tests and reported limitation in walking one-half mile, adjusting for risk factors for disability. Results. We found that 76.6% of prevalent and 88.4% of new-onset self-reported limitation fit within the hypothesized hierarchical pattern. The estimated strength of association between a decrement in lower extremity performance and reported limitation increased with task demand for the primary outcome, reported limitation in walking one-half mile. For example, the odds ratios for prevalent report of walking limitation, versus no limitation, for 10% lower performance walking, dressing, repeating chair stands, and climbing, respectively, were 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.17), 1.08 (1.00-1.16), 1.15 (1.06-1.25), and 1.22 (1.12-1.33). Conclusions. This study partially supports the hypothesis that mobility performance tends to follow a hierarchical pattern. For studying mild mobility disability, walking speed may not be as useful as more demanding tests. Identifying declines in performance through more demanding tests such as climbing should improve the ability to target preventive interventions to individuals at risk of mild mobility decline within a high-functioning population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249690101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249690101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17339641

AN - SCOPUS:34249690101

VL - 62

SP - 167

EP - 173

JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

SN - 1079-5006

IS - 2

ER -